Democratic Party of Wisconsin - 5th Congressional District

The Key to Democracy is Putting People First
Home
About Us
Calendar
Contact Us
Site Map
Democratic Blog Links
Elections Archives
Support Democratic Candidates
Founding Documents
Constitutions
How Democrats Can Win with their Values
News
Newsletter
Platform and Resolutions
Democratic Presidential Candidates
Your Elected Officials - What Have They Done For You Lately?
5th CD Research Project
Educational Resource Links
Issues
On The Issues
Seniors topics of concern
Healthcare Assistance
Heating Energy Assistance
The FACTS
McCain: WRONG for America
McCain Archives 2008
Lead up to 2010 Elections
What Bush did TO us
RepubliCONNING America
Walker Watch
This is the Official Web Page of the
5th Congressional District -
Democratic Party of Wisconsin 
 
We launched this site to provide better access for the people of the 5th CD to their elected Democratic Party representatives. 
 
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=www.wisc5thcddems.com&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=tahoma&amp;colorscheme=dark&amp;height=35" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:35px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
 

 

Click on the links and the drop down menus to the left to go to other sections.

 

 

It was a DONKEY that carried Mary, the Mother of Jesus, to the Manger where she gave birth to him, (with no healthcare or insurance infrastructure to care for her then either, so there hasn’t been much advancement in the last 2,000 years).

 

It is STILL the DONKEY that carries the poor, and provides them with help to provide jobs, healthcare and social justice, while the ELEPHANT continues to expect to be carried BY them.

 

 

·        "There are seven sins in the world: Wealth without work, Pleasure without conscience, Knowledge without character, Commerce without morality, Science without humanity, Worship without sacrifice and Politics without principle."

·                 "First they laugh at you, then they ignore you, then they fight with you, then you win."                    

                      Mahatma Gandhi

 

 

      Pictures from Occupy Wall Street Protests Across The Country

      New York City Times Square

 

      

            

       Oakland, California

     

            

      

 

      

       Note the difference in the Police Response to UNARMED Occupy Wall Street Protestors versus what happened to ARMED Tea Party Rallys!  

     

        

 

      

       The crowds scattered as police fired tear gas on the protestors.  Several brave citizens ran to help an elderly woman stranded in her wheelchair, stuck in the tear gas clouds.

 

        

          

         A single unarmed U.S. Sailor stands with a Veterans Flag against barracaded police in full riot gear.

 

       

 

       USMC Sergeant Scott Olsen, originally from Wisconsin, survived two tours of duty in Iraq, only to be SHOT IN THE HEAD, with a rubber bullet from the Oakland Police.  He is in CRITICAL CONDITION, and may become the first fatality of the protests.

      

        

        Members of the Marines and Navy, are so incensed by this senseless act of violence by the Oakland Police that they have been volunteering to PROTECT THE PROTESTORS AGAINST THE OAKLAND POLICE.

      

         

       Oakland Police violence against UNARMED PEACEFUL PROTESTORS ISN'T ANYTHING NEW.  Look at this picture of an unarmed 14 year old girl who was beaten up by police back on 2003.

       

 

       

         

 

                  

        You may want to remember that it was Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, who were in the White House from 1980 to 1992, when these massive shifts went into high gear.

 

       

 

       

 

      

           

        "Guy Fawkes" from "V" for Vendetta.  It's not just for Halloween anymore.

 

                

      What's this guy smiling for?  He's about to be recalled, but he and his administration are EXEMPT from his own policy of PAY FREEZES for public employees.  THEY are getting RAISES!!!!!

 

          

 

        

 

       

            

         

       How do Republicans "justify" cutting the wages of teachers, who are responsible for giving YOUR CHILDREN the skills they will need to earn a living and have a future, by 20% from a $50,000 annual income, but refuse to allow a 3% increase in taxes on the super rich?  How do they slash billions from Medicare and Social Security benefits, while giving MORE than those cuts in TAX BENEFITS to Corporations and the super rich?  They haven't reduced the COST of operating government.  They only slash the FUNDING OF Government, so that the Rich and Corporations pay little to nothing, while YOU get LESS and PAY MORE FOR LESS, and the Rich and Corporations reap all the benefits!

 

         Think any of that is "over the top"?  Remember when REPUBLICANS CHEERED during the Republican Presidential Primary Debates, when Ron Paul was asked if he was okay with letting people DIE if they didn't have healthcare insurance, or the money to pay for treatment, and he said YES?!

      

      

       These are all DEMOCRATIC policies.  Republicans have historically been AGAINST all of them, (except when they claim to be for them, to get you to vote for them, and then GUT these programs).

       Republicans have been telling the biggest LIES about how cutting taxes for the wealthy would create jobs.  They've benefitted from over $2 TRILLION in tax cuts from the first 6-7 years they were in effect, IN ADDITION to the over $2 Trillion it cost taxpayers because it added to the DEFICIT.  The extension of the tax cuts for the wealthy added more than $1 Trillion MORE to the deficit.  But where are the JOBS which were promised these tax cuts would create?  THEY NEVER APPEARED.   It has been TEN YEARS since the first Trillion dollar tax cut under Bush and Republicans in Congress.

       Here's WHY THEY NEVER WILL.  When the RICH are given TRILLIONS in tax cuts for DOING NOTHING - THAT is exactly what they do - NOTHING!  That is why they don't create more jobs!  And because there are FEWER jobs, there are FEWER taxpayers remaining to pay for needed infrastructure expenses which are necessary to keep this country running, and the BURDEN on the MIDDLE CLASS gets even BIGGER.

       On the other hand, RAISING TAXES ON THE RICH, like CLINTON DID, CREATED 23 MILLION JOBS in eight years, in comparison to George W. Bush's paltry 3 million jobs (the worst job creation record of any President since WWII).  WHY?  Because, when you raise taxes on the Rich, THEY HAVE TO SPEND MONEY TO CREATE JOBS, AND EMPLOY MORE PEOPLE, IN ORDER TO KEEP THEIR INCOME HIGH.  While the costs to them are MINISCULE in comparision to the rates ACTUALLY PAID by the poor and middle class (because the tax code has so many loopholes to allow the super rich and corporations to pay little to NOTHING, even though their published RATES are shown to be higher).   And because more people are EMPLOYED, MORE goods and services are purchased, and a higher standard of living is had by all.  Even the Richest got RICHER under these circumstances, because they had more people MAKING MORE MONEY FOR THEM.  But, that would mean that they would actually have to WORK, and INVEST their money, and even take RISKS.  And THAT is what the rich REFUSE TO DO.

      Republicans attacked Governor Doyle and Democrats in the State Legislature for "raising taxes" (but they never said upon whom or how much was involved).  Democrats raised taxes on corporations from 5% of the total state revenues to 7% (Republicans had previously cut them from almost 12% to 5% under Tommy Thompson and Scott McCallum and a Republican Legislature. That created an OVER $3.5 Billion Wisconsin State Deficit, which Governor Doyle and Democrats INHERITED from Republicans. That's also why YOUR PROPERTY TAXES are so high.  YOU PAID for the taxes that THEY DIDN'T PAY.)  And, Republicans attacked Democrats for "raising state income taxes" ON THE RICH.  Democrats only raised them by 1% for people earning MORE THAN $300,000 or more annually!  That only amounts to $3,000 per year.

      In comparison, Republicans promoting flat tax ideas, like Herman Cain's (who only last year stated that those same ideas were GIMMICKS and wouldn't work), would DOUBLE sales taxes which would hurt the lowest income wage earners the most, forcing them to pay a HIGHER percentage of their income in taxes.  The average middle income family would end up paying an estimated $5,500 MORE in taxes on FAR LESS income.  At the same time, they want to drop the top tax rate from 35% to 9%.  By the time they got through manipulating the tax loopholes, the Rich would end up paying NOTHING.  The more that happens, the more average wage earners end up having to pay for what the RICH AREN'T PAYING!

      Ever wonder why Republicans are always talking about "making sure that government doesn't limit YOUR ability to earn money" so THEY can "earn" whatever they want, but they always end up putting limits on how much YOU CAN EARN?  It's simple.  The less YOU get to take home, the MORE THEY get to take home, at least short term.  Eventually, their business crashes and burns, because there isn't anyone left to run the business, or who cares enough to give the customer the best service possible, because the employees are only concerned about getting out of the job they hate, as fast as possible.

     An acquaintance of mine told me about how he took over his family's business which was failing because of expenses which he couldn't continue.  He said that he had a talk with his employees and explained to them that his business was in jeopardy of closing if he couldn't keep costs down.  Now if he would have stopped there, it probably wouldn't have made any difference to his workers.  At that time, they could have easily just gone out to get another job (at least back then they were available).  But then he took it a step further and offered them all of them an ownership stake in the business based on how long they had been their and on merit.  If his business was able to cut costs and increase profits, his employees would all share in it.  If his company failed, then everyone would lose their ownership stake in the business.

     He was surprised with how quickly the business turned around.

     Everyone pitched in.  The morale got better almost immediately.  And expenses dropped quickly.  Things that the employees didn't care about before, like turning out the lights, or making sure that they didn't leave expensive tools behind on the job site stopped, because the workers realized that any of those expenses would affect THEM, rather than just their employer.  Their pay, after all, had been FIXED before.  Nothing they did, would have affected how much they earned per hour before.  Now, it made the difference between getting a profit based bonus at the end of the year, or getting nothing.  Now it mattered.  And, not only did individual employees change their own behaviour to cut down the expenses they were each responsible for, but they became much more responsible in making sure that younger or newer employees became quickly trained in everything they needed to know to cut any expenses anywhere they could. 

     At the end of the year, not only had the company reduced their expenses drastically below what they would have normally seen, but the business became very profitable and remained so for years after.

     It wasn't just the family that started the company that benefitted, but everyone in the company.  Compare that to the Republican Party and corporate executives approach of slash and burn, gutting entire companies and eliminating thousands of jobs to make a quick buck, with no consideration to the long term consequences.

     It reminds me of a story that Lee Iacoca told about his experience working as a top executive for Ford Motor Company, when the accountants (he referred to them as the "bean counters"), came into high level meetings with top executives recommending that several manufacturing plants be shut down across the country, because they weren't at 50% profitability.  There were too many expenses, they argued, to keep the business profitable.   "Why don't we just shut down the entire company?  Then we won't have any expenses."

     Of course, he was being flippant.  But he got the point across to the rest of the management, that you don't just close up shop, just because parts of the business aren't operating at the top profitability rates all the time.  You do what you can to make improvements in efficiencies, to get rid of the clutter and the waste FIRST.

     We're in the EXACT SAME POSITION with our GOVERNMENT as Ford Motor Company was in THEN.  You don't just shut everything down immediately, like Republicans have been doing.  That is the WORST thing you could do.  You FIRST improve efficiencies and eliminate WASTE.  You keep everyone working as much as possible, or you will end up gutting the country.  But Republicans don't care about that, because THEY were the ones who were busy spending the country's wealth, shoveling it as fast as they could to give Billions to corporations who were generous donors to the Republican Party, without providing ANY accounting for where the MONEY WENT, didn't care about the fact that they put us over $11 TRILLION in the HOLE during the Bush Administration, and causing another $18 Trillion worth of losses when the Stock Market crashed at the end of 2008.

     But they don't want you to remember THAT, now do they?

       

"All that harms labor is treason to America. One line can be drawn between these two. If any man tells you he loves America, yet he hates labor he is a liar. If any man tells you He trusts America yet hates labor he is a fool".

 ...Abraham Lincoln

      

     My, how far the Republican Party has strayed from its roots.  It is nothing but an empty shell of what it used to represent.         

    

     This is a poll started by Republicans and businessmen, sent only to other Republicans and cronies to "show" that most people in Wisconsin support Walker.  It'll be released to the public in a few days.  Your vote matters!!!  Make sure that they don't get a skewed, fraudulent, pro-Walker result. 

 

                 

     Html : POLL: Do you approve of the job Gov. Walker is doing?

    

        People have asked for information on where to find buttons, bumper stickers and signs etc... calling for Gv. Walker's recall.  Here are a few sites where these articles are available:

    http://www.cafepress.com/LeftTease/7748384   http://www.zazzle.com/recall_walker_bumper_sticker-128151305443287198  

    There are also some "Recall Walker" bumper stickers with the "Sign Display Local 820" logo on them, but I don't have the contact information for them.

     David Prosser: The Partisans' Partisan in Six Acts

         

        http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/blog/2011/03/david-prosser-the-partisans-partisan-in-six-acts.html

         Consider these six items:

David Prosser was a Republican Assembly representative for 18 years, including serving as the Republican leader and speaker. As the Greater Wisconsin Committee showed at www.ProsserEqualsWalker.com, "As a legislator, Prosser voted to restrict the collective  bargaining rights of teachers. As a judge, Prosser sided against collective bargaining rights and against workers who were being deprived of their retirement benefits. Recently, Prosser told a Republican group that there was a "100 percent" chance that Walker's collective bargaining legislation would come before the court. Prosser said to the Republicans that he could not signal his likely position, but criticized his opponent for being supported by unions."

David Prosser served as a mentor for young Republican Representative Scott Walker and shepherded Walker into an unbending Republican partisan - and Walker and Prosser voted together 95 percent of the time when Walker served under Prosser's leadership in the disastrous 1995-96 legislative session. Prosser's campaign manager infamously also said he Prosser would serve as a "complement" to the Walker administration and its unprecedented attacks on workers' rights, education, health care, seniors' access to prescription drugs, recycling and support for local communities.

David Prosser has served the agenda of the Republican money machine at Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce including adopting their rule to allow justices to rule on cases in which they've spent money - such as the $5 million they spent to help Annette Ziegler and Mike Gableman get elected - and now WMC has put up ads to support Prosser in his current race.

David Prosser was a failed Republican candidate for U.S. Congress running in 1996 for the seat vacated by retiring fellow Republican Toby Roth. Prosser was a loyal Republican soldier ready to serve the agenda of Newt Gingrich and the attacks on the middle class.

David Prosser has been a featured guest of the Tea Party and his much-publicized appearance at the Koch brothers-financed Americans for Prosperity "Defending the Dream" summit in 2010 in which Republicans assembled to attack in public investment, access to affordable health care and strategize in advance of the 2010 Republican take-over of the Wisconsin state legislature and the election of Walker as governor.

David Prosser touts the endorsements of 69 Republican legislators who voted for the Republican assault on working families and who will help Walker pass his budget which includes the largest cuts to public education in Wisconsin's history -- $834 million in cuts to K-12 education alone; decimates technical colleges, privatizes the UW; includes $84 million in tax giveaways for big business and the wealthy, while at the same time raising taxes by $51 million on the poorest Wisconsinites. Walker's budget will raise SeniorCare prescription drug costs to pay off $1.3 million in donations to Walker and the Republican Governors Association; and even allow health care plans suddenly drop their coverage for contraception.

Quite a list.

But maybe I'm just being a "total bitch" with this analysis. I can only hope Prosser doesn't try and "destroy" me, too, by pointing out the obvious - he is the most unrelenting partisan who has ever been on Wisconsin's Supreme Court.

One Wisconsin Now has a long record of analysis and research on judicial ethics and integrity, including exposing Mike Gableman's pay-to-play contributions which helped get him his judicial appointment and Annette Ziegler's unprecedented scandal and conflicts of interest.

 

 

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/03/24/959689/-UPDATE-LAM-RESIGNS-IN-Dep-Prosecutor-Suggested-Gov-Walker-fake-an-attack-on-himself

 

 

Thu Mar 24, 2011 at 02:12 PM EDT

UPDATE-LAM RESIGNS. IN Dep. Prosecutor Suggested Gov. Walker fake an attack on himself?

by Rock Strongo

Share373  59

I have to put the question mark in the title because the deputy prosecutor suggested that his email account was hacked. But all the indications are that a deputy prosecutor in Indiana allegedly sent an email to Wisconsin governor Scott Walker suggesting that Walker fake a physical attack on himself and possibly use a firearm.

The back story of this is that recently through a freedom of information act request, thousand of emails to the WI governor were released. Now news organizations are beginning to go through them.

WisconsinWatch.org picks up the story from there:

Indiana prosecutor denies encouraging Wisconsin violence
By Kate Golden
Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

The email came to Gov. Scott Walker from the personal account of a deputy prosecutor and Republican activist in Indiana.

After praise for Walker, the email — sent Feb. 19, during union demonstrations against Walker’s budget repair bill — then took a darker turn. It suggested that the situation in Wisconsin presented “a good opportunity for what’s called a ‘false flag’ operation.”

“If you could employ an associate who pretends to be sympathetic to the unions’ cause to physically attack you (or even use a firearm against you), you could discredit the unions,” the email said.

“Currently, the media is painting the union protest as a democratic uprising and failing to mention the role of the DNC and umbrella union organizations in the protest. Employing a false flag operation would assist in undercutting any support that the media may be creating in favor of the unions. God bless, Carlos F. Lam.”


http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/...

Lam denies that he wrote the email and claims that his account was hacked. Though as the story points out the IP address was from Indianapolis, where Lam lives, and the writing matches that that Lam has left on message boards.

Will anything come of a state prosecutor (allegedly) suggesting a governor fake violence to discredit opponents? Apparently not. Lam's republican boss says in the article that he has no plans to investigate.

UPDATE-WisconsinWatch.org has updated their story saying that Lam has admitted writing the email and has now resigned. Here is a statement from the Johnson County Prosecutor, who as I noted in the original story, said he would not investigate the claim. http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/...   

 http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Message-From-The-Prosecutor.pdf

 

Originally posted to Rock Strongo on Thu Mar 24, 2011 at 02:12 PM EDT.

 

 

     State Supreme Court Justice David Prosser, is the Conservative Justice, along with Ziegler and Gableman, all supported by WMC, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, and FUNDED by the Koch Brothers, giving Governor Scott Walker, the majority on the Wisconsin State Supreme Court. 

   Is this really the kind of behavior we expect of a Supreme Court Justice?  Isn't he just showing that he is a shill for the Koch Brothers and their extremist agenda?

 

    I saw the shocking newspaper story this morning and I’m sending this ASAP because I know you’d want to know.

     Read about the stunning incident in today’s Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: “Justice David Prosser exploded at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson behind closed doors, calling her a ‘bitch’ and threatening to ‘destroy’ her.”

     Are you outraged? I am. But at One Wisconsin Now we’ve researched his record thoroughly and we’ve seen this total lack of respect for people before. Over and over, Prosser’s put his own narrow interests and support for big business ahead of the needs of Wisconsinites. Sounds like the same complaints we all have about Gov. Scott Walker.

   We need to get the word out. Can you help us by making a one-time contribution to our Judicial Ethics and Integrity effort to ensure people know the facts?
http://onewisconsinnow.pnstate.org/site/Donation2?df_id=1464&1464.donation=form1

    Here’s just a couple things we’ve seen:

     Prosser actually accused rape victims of lying to more easily access abortion services. He said, “People lie and lie ... We can't allow someone who writes a few words on a piece of paper to skirt the law.” (UPI, 1/30/90)

     He helped fellow right-wing Justice Mike Gableman avoid responsibility for running a false and racist ad against Louis Butler. (MJS, 7/1/10)

    Prosser let Gov. Scott Walker’s bosses at Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce rewrite the rules so no matter how much big business  spends to elect them, justices don’t have to recuse themselves from cases involving big business. (State Bar, 1/22/10)

     It’s chilling conduct. Chilling.

     Can you help us by making a one-time contribution to our Judicial Ethics and Integrity issues effort to ensure people know the facts? A contribution today will make all the difference.
http://onewisconsinnow.pnstate.org/site/Donation2?df_id=1464&1464.donation=form1

     Thanks for all you do
 scot
 One Wisconsin Now

      PS: The issues of judicial integrity and ethics are vital. When David Prosser said he wants to be a “complement” to Gov. Walker, what did he mean by that?   Please support our efforts and we’ll fight to get an answer to that question.

 

 

   TAKE AWAY WALKER'S RUBBER STAMP ON THE STATE SUPREME COURT on APRIL 5, 2011. 

   VOTE for JoAnne Kloppenburg for State Supreme Court Justice!

Check out  the new ad on Prosser, http://www.prosserequalswalker.com/video_rubber_stamp.htm

Then sign the petition to demand Justice Prosser recuse himself from cases involving Governor Scott Walker.  http://www.prosserequalswalker.com/petition.htm

And VOTE on April 5th 2011, for JoAnne Kloppenburg for State Supreme Court Justice!

 

VOLUNTEER: Help recall Wisconsin Republicans

Join the recall efforts in three ways!

1. Join a canvass event near you

2. Collect signatures on your own

Can't make an event? Click here to download a recall form and collect signatures on your own.

3. Donate to the recall efforts

Click here to chip in and donate to the PCCC's recall efforts.

Only Wisconsin residents represented by this Senator can sign this recall petition, but any Wisconsin eligible voter or out of state person can volunteer to collect signatures!

NOTE: Wisconsin law says elected officials must be in office a year before they are recalled. The entire state assembly, Gov. Walker, and the rest of the Republicans in the state senate not listed above were all last elected in 2010 and sworn in January, 2011, so none of them can be recalled until January 2012. (Not entirely accurate - Jim Ott out of Mequon was elected a couple of years ago - 2008, so he can be recalled NOW! And his margin of victory in 2008 was only a couple of percentage points.)

 

 

From: Tracey Sperko

 

Cuts to WI Veteran Programs - Some of US Will Die in the Streets Because of This

 

This quote is from the Capital Times and was taken from the Department of Veterans Affairs of WI from Spencer Black:

 

"What the budget could mean for the grandfathers, fathers, sisters and neighbors of Wisconsin taxpayers who served in the Armed Services, from what Black says, is reduced access to burial benefits, nursing homes, and assistance programs that provide job training, education, counseling and substance abuse treatment to veterans at risk of finding themselves homeless and those who already have."

 

I am angry over these cuts because myself (sic) and many veterans in WI worked with Governor Doyle to bring the WI veteran benefits to some of the top in the United States. Doyle had an understanding and commitment to veterans that was communicated by his actions to meet the need of our returning veterans and those that were here already. I was proud of our state and felt we were moving in the right direction to meet the needs OF OUR war veterans we have now.

 

Walker on the other hand, who NEVER SERVED A DAY IN HIS LIFE, walks in the Milwaukee Veterans Day parade that my Veterans for Peace Post IS DENIED FROM walking in as we are deemed too political. Walker has a Veterans Day at the Mke Public Zoo that is one of the biggest days each for the zoo and they plan for it all year, but it has always been a publicity stunt for him. Honorable veterans that I know, like a Marine and a Mke Cty Supervisor who worked with Walker was ignored time and time again. People on my FB have been asked to leave the zoo on this day. This day leaves thousands of veterans and their families feeling warm and fuzzy because Scotty cares (BS).

 

Well veterans of the VFW and American Legion, good job, you elected a right wing conservative nut job who just cut a great deal of the benefits to the veterans of WI. We Veterans have failed our brothers and sisters. We veterans have failed the citizens of our state by NOT upholding the Constitution of the United States.

 

Right this wrong and come out into the streets. Help us to RECALL the people who would do this. Some of those cuts mean some of us will die. Some of us will die in the streets. This doesn't have to be. We can change this. Rise up and fight this. Our bothers and sisters need us. WI needs us to fight. We are not REPUBLICANS and DEMOCRATS- WE ARE VETERANS!!!

 

        

 

 

     

 

 

     Massive Earthquake and Tsunami hits Japan (8.9 on Richter Scale)

Fifth largest earthquake in recorded history since 1900 hits Japan at 2:46 in the afternoon, measuring at least 8.9 on the Richter Scale lasting for about 7 minutes, with a resulting 30 ft Tsunami leveling the entire city of Sendai.  More than 4 million people are without power.   This earthquake is estimated to be more than 8,000 times larger than the one that hit New Zealand.

 

At least 100 aftershocks with a magnitude of 5.0 or greater have occurred since the main earthquake.(over300 aftershocks reported)

 

A huge oil refinery fire in Tokyo.  At least 80 fires burning.

 

A Nuclear Reactor cooling system failed in Fukushima.  1000 times the normal radioactive level was measured currently, and it will get worse, because the radioactive vapors are going to be released in order to try to cool down the reactor so it doesn’t completely melt down.

 

3 Nuclear Reactors are in trouble.

 

No nuclear regulations are in place, anywhere in the world, to build the plants to the level that they can withstand an earthquake anywhere near this level of intensity.

 

 

 

    

    

    

   Two different power plant locations, with 3 and 2 reactors affected, respectively are dealing with overheating issues, because of lack of power and therefore lack of circulating water for coolant of those reactors.  They are now dealing with pressure twice what the reactors were designed for.  Radioactive steam has had to be released into the atmosphere, and people within a 6 mile radius were told to evacuate.

   Japan has the toughest earthquake and tsunami preparedness and building codes in the world.  4 million are without power.  Where do you think we would be, if it hit California or the East coast of the United States?  We aren't anywhere NEAR as prepared as they are.

   But Republicans in Congress want to slash funding for NOAA, the U.S. National Weather Service, and build new nuclear power plants, instead of investing in SAFE, RENEWABLE energy like solar and wind turbines.

     Remember how Senator John McCain told everyone that the "U.S. economy was strong" in the morning, before the stock market crashed, and he revised that to "The U.S. is in an economic crisis" in the afternoon?  Remember how Bush told us for years that the U.S. economy was strong, even when they were privately "working on a financial solution to the crisis" for months BEFORE September 17, 2008?

     Ya think this just might be another one of those times, when Republicans are lying to us again just to advance their political agenda?

     http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/11/tsunami-relief-gop-budget-cuts_n_834479.html

Wendell Phillips: "The labor movement means just this: It is the last noble protest of the American people against the power of incorporated wealth."
 

Dwight D. Eisenhower:

      "Only a fool would try to deprive working men and working women of their right to join the union of their choice."

     Does ANYONE OUT THERE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE INTEGRITY or can be TRUSTED after the THREE ILLEGAL VOTES THEY SLAMMED THROUGH THE ASSEMBLY and STATE SENATE?  By the way, the reason Republicans HAD TO PASS, these bills right AWAY, RATHER THAN SUSPENDING DEBATE AND reconvening LATER was because (in the case of the Assembly), they just HAD to get this passed before the Ronald Reagan Dinner that evening; and for the Republican State Senators, they just HAD to have a WIN in their pockets before going to Washington, D.C. for a big $1,000 a plate fundraiser.  So, even if the bill is ruled to have been passed illegally, they can STILL raise buckets of money from their donors before they realize that the bill shouldn't stand.  

     After voting to eliminate collective bargaining and giving the Governor the right to dissolve local governments and elected officials whenever he chooses to do so, can you REALLY believe that what they are doing is reflective of a representative government?

     If you've been paying attention, I'd think you would say NO to that last question.  So, if you don't want Walker to have a rubber stamp to do whatever he wants, I certainly hope that you will take action and join in our efforts to recall Republican State Senators who support Walker, (and Walker as soon as his one year is up), as well as Republican Assembly Representatives who support Walker, and even those who don't support Walker, so that Democrats have the opportunity to gain enough votes to override Walker's vetoes.

     You can also join in the boycotting of any and all companies that support Walker, and any other Republicans.  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Scott-Walker-Contributors/101624709918554?sk=info

And, most importantly, you need to show up to VOTE to prevent pro-billionaire rubber stamps from being elected or re-elected.      

     On April 5th , 2011 you will have the chance to choose between Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice Prosser, who is supported by the same unions that supported Scott Walker in 2010, and has his TV commercials paid for by Wisconsin's Club For Growth (a front group for the Koch Brothers, who are the puppet masters behind Scott Walker), or Joanne Kloppenburg.   

     A vote for Kloppenburg is a vote AGAINST Walker and his rubber stamp.  http://www.kloppenburgforjustice.com/index.html

     You also have a choice between Chris Abele and Republican Jeff Stone, Walker Clone for Milwaukee County Exec.  You should know already what a mess that Walker left behind in Milwaukee County, and what he is doing to the state of Wisconsin so this should be a no-brainer. 

     Chris Abele has been endorsed by City of Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett (D).  http://www.chrisabele.com/ 

     By the way, in case anyone is truly interested, you can look at the budget numbers, from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, dated March 9, 2011, based on numbers originally reported on January 31, 2011, proving that there WAS NEVER A FISCAL CRISIS as REPUBLICONS had fraudulently claimed!!! 

     http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb/2011-13%20Budget/2011_03_09%20Modification%20to%20SS%20SB%2011_AB%2011.pdf

     And, if anyone wants to claim that there is a greater surplus after the Republican poilcies are implemented (by about $40 million), well DUUHHH!!!  They are cutting $1.5 BILLION in spending to do that!

     But by doing that, the result is that they lose Federal funds to help pay for many necessary programs which many citizens depend on for SURVIVAL.  And most of the jobs that the programs fund, and the public employees that work for a living, pay a good chunk of that money BACK to the State and Federal Government in the form of income taxes.  And the money they spend, supports hundreds of thousands of other jobs, which also pay taxes.  You eliminate those jobs, and you create a domino effect, that creates an even larger revenue shortfall, and an even bigger debt which you can't pay off, because of the lack of cash flow.  And that hurts companies which depend on them for their discretionary spending.  Have you forgotten what we just went through with automobilew manufacturers who couldn't sell their vehicles? 

     Any idiot can cut spending by slashing programs, but it takes considerable thought and effort to cut costs while IMPROVING services that benefit us all, and making services more efficient and cost-effective.

     The fact is that too many wealthy individuals and corporations are paying far less than their fair share of income taxes, or in many cases NONE AT ALL.  Eliminating the loop holes that allow them to evade taxes would not only balance the budgets of states and the Federal Government, but it would ELIMINATE the DEBTS ENTIRELY! 

     But Republicans have always refused to even consider raising taxes on individuals and corporations who/which aren't currently paying their fair share, but who benefit at YOUR EXPENSE.

     Haven't you had enough yet?

 

     From: torrey@wi.rr.com
To: torrey@moderntravel.net
Subject: We need YOU to Recall Grothman and Darling
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:21:38 -0600


Hi Everyone,
 
As many of you have already heard, various Wisconsinites have filed papers to recall certain members of the state legislature.  We have 60 days to collect enough signatures to force a special election.  THIS CAN BE DONE!  But, we need YOUR help and we need your help more than once in order to be successful in this recall!  The recall lays entirely within how many signatures you can get in the next 58 days left. 
 
Of interest for Washington County are the recall of State Senator Alberta Darling and State Representative Grothman.  You are free to pick which of these you want to concentrate your efforts on, but my personal opinion is that we need to concentrate in West Bend to recall Grothman.  That isn’t to say that we won’t need volunteers knocking on doors in Darling’s district which includes  Germantown, Menomonee Falls, parts of the North Shore and Milwaukee. 
 
Please sign up for canvasses that are happening THIS WEEKEND by going to www.recalltherepublican8.com for information on all the canvasses this weekend.
 
Also, check out www.recalltherepublican8.com for information on canvasses this weekend.
  
I want to stress that we will ONLY succeed in the recall if everyone gets involved and knocks on doors.  The time to make a difference is now. 
 
The number of signatures that we need are approximately 450 per day!
 
If you have any questions, please let me know. 
 
Lastly, please forward to everyone you know so we can get the maximum number of doors knocked and complete the recall well before the 60 days ends!
 
In solidarity,
Torrey Lauer, Chair
Washington County Democratic Party
www.washingtoncountywisdems.org

 

Here is a message from Lee Gierke regarding a Saturday rally.  Contact him for any questions:  gierke48@sbcglobal.net . 

  

Lee Gierke

 

Also, for those of you who are represented in the legislature by Alberta Darling, here is information on the recall effort:

 

From: Kristopher Rowe < recalldarling@me.com  >

 

Date: March 2, 2011 4:26:56 PM CST

 

To: recalldarling@me.com

 

Subject: We Are Live

 

It is with pleasure I can formally announce the campaign begins.  The papers have been filed and our clock is ticking.  (You only have 60 days from the date of filing to collect the required number of signatures.)

 

I want to clear the air right away before this goes into full swing. 

 

We have been working with the Democratic Party as well as some non-profit organizations to coordinate this huge undertaking.  Having said that--this is till our movement.  They are working with us.  They stand beside us--not in front of us.

 

Also--if you have experience canvassing and would like to lead one of the groups let me know that in the email.

 

To those of you who are unsure--you don't have to be a District 8 resident to help collect signatures--you only have to be eligible to vote in the United States.

 

So--come one--come all. 

 

This is our time.  This is it.  Together we will succeed.

 

 

In solidarity,

 

 

Kristopher M. Rowe

Darling Recall Campaign Organizer

recalldarling@me.com

 

      From Perry Duman:
 All politics is local. 
 So let's make sure the Democrat who lives and works in the 60th Assembly district gets on the ballot. 
 I know many of you are feeling compelled to go to Madison again this weekend and many want to get involved with the recall efforts. 
 But first things first.  We have only four days left to collect nomination signatures for the special election for the 60th Assembly district (versus 60 days to circulate recall petitions). 
 We need you right here, right now.  Please help put Perry Duman on the ballot. 
 We will be meeting on Saturday (3/5) and Sunday (3/6) at 9 am at Alterra Coffee in Grafton (1211 Washington at 12th Ave).  From there, we'll fan out in teams to high traffic areas throughout the district.  Please let us know if you can participate, so we can have enough clip boards and papers available.  (If you can't make it right at 9 am, please come anyway.  Someone will be posted at Alterra throughout the day.) 
Your help is truly appreciated!   
Perry Duman
Duman for Assembly
www.dumanforassembly.org
info@dumanforassembly.org
262.268.6642
And regarding a recall:
The recall effort for Sen. Grothman has begun as well.  See:  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Recall-Glenn-Grothman/192474544106428.  

     More information on Perry Duman's campaign can be found here: http://dougiecyanide.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/perry-duman-the-right-choice-for-the-60th-assembly-district/

 

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Could Scott Walker's virtual blackmailing of the citizens of Wisconsin end up costing Badger State taxpayers millions of dollars?

Quite likely.

As BuzzFlash pointed out in an earlier column, "Walker Whacks Wisconsin Taxpayers With Bill for Wackenhut After Illegally Asserting Powers", Walker used the time-pressed coercion technique to fire union security guards at the Milwaukee County Court House and two other buildings. As executive director of the county, he bypassed the board to crush the union, claiming a fiscal emergency.

Sound familiar? Well, as we noted (hat tip to Rachel Maddow), an arbitrator has subsequently ruled against Walker. As a result, the taxpayers of Milwaukee will have to pay half a million dollars in back wages to the union security guards, who were ordered reinstated. That's on top of the money wasted on the union-busting Wackenhut firm, whose Milwaukee supervisor was allegedly a convicted criminal.

Fast forward to 2011 and we have another potential situation of claiming an emergency, taking precipitous ideological action, and the state taxpayers potentially ending up paying the bill as they are doing in Milwaukee County.

Already, at least one Wisconsin labor union has filed a formal complaint against Walker, charging him with refusing to bargain with them, in violation of current law.

Meanwhile, as Ruth Cuniff reports in The Progressive, fear of Walker's thuggish efforts to enrich wealthy backers at the expense of public workers is driving state employees to retire early at a record pace, causing confusion and disruption in state services.

Walker leaves a trail of bills and chaos in his wake. Unfortunately, the taxpayers will likely have to pay the debt down the road for his high-handed, high-pressure tactics.

 

 

The Institute for Wisconsin's Future at WisconsinsFuture.org has a number of different publications about how we can balance the budget and eliminate our state debts.  One of their publications addresses this $1.3 Billion shortfall of taxes THAT ARE KNOWN TO BE OWED, by companies that just don't pay them. 

 

What this doesn't touch on however, is the fact that tax loopholes created by Republicans while in office, over a decade earlier, make it legal for huge Multi national, Multi billion corporations to not pay any State Corporate Income Taxes on BILLIONS of dollars worth of income from EACH COMPANY.  2/3rds of Corporations operating in Wisconsin (and in the Nation for that matter), don't pay ANYTHING in Corporate Income Taxes. 

 

Taking that into account brings the state shortfall closer to $6 Billion annually. That is almost twice what the total state DEBT is projected over the next TWO years.

 

The Koch Brothers own Koch Industries which earns $100 Billion annually, federal and state tax FREE.   They also own Georgia Pacific which funneled $11 Billion in profits out of the state of Wisconsin, and paid no taxes. That's $35 Billion in Federal Corporate Income Taxes they AREN'T PAYING, and $6 BILLION in STATE Corporate Income Taxes they AREN'T PAYING, ANNUALLY!

 

Corporations have been blaming the workers for over a hundred years, while corporations rack in the profits and take all the money for themselves and give the crumbs to the workers to battle over.

 

The current labor battle shouldn't just be a union collective bargaining issue.  It needs to be a Corporations MUST Pay Their Fair Share of Taxes  issue as well.

 

Look at these numbers.  DO THE MATH.  And then tell me that it is the workers' fault that we are in this recession and we need to slash their benefits to balance the State and Federal deficits and eliminate the debts.  This data documents the fact that it is the multi-billion dollar corporations that don't pay their fair share of taxes that are sucking this country dry.  NOT THE WORKERS!

 

And it is the CORPORATIONS who are outsourcing industries and jobs so that 50% of all consumer spending is now purchasing products made overseas, which does NOTHING for our economy and jobs here at home.

 

Corporations are KNOWN to be siphoning off $100 Billion a year to funnel into OFFSHORE TAX HAVENS.

 

Republicans ADMITTED on the FLOOR OF CONGRESS in 2009, and Mike Huckabee ADMITTED DURING THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES in 2008, that tax cheats had hidden $12 to $20 TRILLION in secret, illegal bank accounts to EVADE U.S. Taxes.  That is 1 to 1.66 TIMES the entire GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE U.S. for a YEAR.

 

Don't you think that there would be more business, more employment and more security if we had that money HERE WORKING IN OUR COMMUNITIES?  Don't you think that we could have eliminated our entire Federal DEBT if we would have that money here, and the taxes PAID FOR?

 

Top tax bracket, 35% rate.  $12 Trillion = $4.2 TRILLION in FEDERAL TAXES FOR ONE YEAR.  That is one third of the total debt.

 

State tax, 6% rate.  $12 Trillion = $720 BILLION in STATE TAXES for ONE YEAR.  That is 4.114 TIMES THE TOTAL STATE DEBTS IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

 

Top tax bracket, 35% rate.  $20 Trillion = $7 TRILLION in FEDERAL TAXES FOR ONE YEAR.  That is TWO THIRDS of the total debt.

 

State tax, 6% rate. $20 Trillion = $1.2 TRILLION for ONE YEAR.That is 6.85 TIMES the total STATE DEBTS in the Entire Country.

 

According to a study commissioned by the Department of Energy and published by the Center for Transportation Analysis in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 2005, the United States has lost up to $8 trillion dollars of wealth in the 30-years from 1970 to 2004 solely due to oil imports.5 This represents a massive transfer of wealth to oil producing countries. And, keep in mind these numbers do not include the huge energy shock we experienced in 2007 and 2008.

 

In 2006, Warren Buffett was quoted on the problem of the U.S. Trade Deficit. At the time, he stated "Right now, the rest of the world owns $3 TRILLION more of us that we do of them."

 

The Trade Deficit we have with China has increased by $226.9 Billion to $273 Billion for every year since then.

 

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html  

 

2007 $258.5 Billion Trade Deficit

2008 $268 Billion Trade Deficit

2009 $226.9 Billion Trade Deficit

2010 $273 Billion Trade Deficit

 

That is an ADDITIONAL $1.0264 TRILLION in Trade Deficit added to the $3 Trillion that was there in 2006, for $4.0264 Trillion in Trade Deficits.

 

50% of all of the money going to corporations in this country goes to corporations which pay NO TAXES.  And that is primarily from huge multinational corporations with Millions and Billions of dollars in transactions every year.

 

That includes ExxonMobil, the number 1 corporation in the world, with reported profits in the Billions every quarter since Bush took office.

 

Do a Google search on “ExxonMobil Quarterly Profits”

 

October 2002 quarterly profit report $2.64 Billion

October 30, 2003 quarterly profit report $3.65 Billion

April 30, 2004 quarterly profit report $5.44 Billion

October, 2004 3rd quarterly profit report $5.68 Billion

Feb 1, 2005 quarterly profit report 6.5 Billion Euros=$10.47 Billion

October 27, 2005 3rd quarterly profit report $9.92 Billion

July 30, 2006 2nd quarterly profit report $10.36 Billion

October 26, 2006 3rd quarterly profit report $10.5 Billion

 

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill urged U.S. oil companies to invest in new refineries – no new refineries were built.  No new refineries have been built in 30 years.  But refining capacity has increased by 10% in the last decade, equivalent to 7-8 new refineries. 

 

Price Gouging after Katrina

 

Some lawmakers have even demanded reimbursement for consumers. Last fall, Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., proposed a temporary windfall tax on big oil companies -- a 50 percent excise tax on oil company profits when the price of domestic oil is above $40 per barrel. The annual revenues collected from the tax would be returned to individual taxpayers as rebates.

 

ExxonMobil Profits:

 

April 29, 2007 quarterly profit report $9.28 Billion

July 2007 2nd quarterly profit report $10.26 Billion on $98.4 Billion in Revenues

(at this point, Exxon has had quarterly profits of $10 Billion for five of the last seven quarters)

Feb 1, 2008 4th quarterly profit report $11.7 Billion  ExxonMobil’s profits for the year averaged $4.6 million an hour!  Bush asks OPEC to boost oil production and they respond by calling in a reduction in oil production.

(profits of the five biggest international oil companies have TRIPLED since 2002)

May 1, 2008 quarterly profit report $11 Billion

July 31, 2008 2nd quarterly profit report $11.68 Billion on $138.1 Billion in Revenues

October 31, 2008 3rd quarterly profit report $14.83 Billion

July 30, 2009 2nd quarterly profit report $3.95 Billion on $74.5 Billion in Revenues

October 29, 2009 3rd quarterly profit report $4.73 Billion

April 29, 2010 1st quarterly profit report $6.4 Billion

July 30, 2010 2nd quarterly profit report 7.6 Billion

January 2011 4th quarterly profit report $9.25 Billion

 

In the past decade, the big five oil companies BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil and Shell made a total of about $1 Trillion in PROFITS.  Yet, tax loopholes are GIVING away at least $4 Billion a year, and that is for the oil companies that are PAYING taxes.  ExxonMobil the number 1 largest, most profitable company on the planet, DOESN’T PAY ANY U.S. CORPORATE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES. 

 

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/01/oil_lust.html

 

 

The current labor battle shouldn't just be a union collective bargaining issue.  It needs to be a "Corporations have to be Fiscally Responsible and Pay Their Fair Share of Taxes" issue as well.

       

The Milwaukee TV Station TMJ4 and their Radio Station WTMJ4, have always had a strongly conservative position, and very rarely provided accurate information when it came to reporting on Liberals and Progressives.  (Their talking Radio Heads Mark Belling, Charlie Sykes and Jeff Wagner, are clearly extremist right wingers.)  John Jagler veteran radio voice of WTMJ Radio AM620, formerly of TMJ Morning News announced his retirement from WTMJ after 15 years on Nov. 22, 2010, and is now the Communications Director for Republican Assembly Majority Leader Jeff Fitzgerald.

 

1.                             Standup 4 Wisconsin | GOP says it has the votes to pass budget bill

Feb 16, 2011 ... In the Assembly, John Jagler, spokesman for Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald (R- Horicon), also said the bill will pass. ...
www.standup4wis.org/?p=1061 - Cached

2.                             Capitol Report: Former Assembly Dems balk at GOP leader's request ...

Jan 11, 2011 ... John Jagler, a spokesman for Fitzgerald's office, says there is nothing ... "To just do a wholesale data dump to Jeff Fitzgerald and his ...
host.madison.com/.../article_f3ce2be2-1db7-11e0-9f66-001cc4c002e0.html - Cached

3.                             Wisconsin Republican Governor to eliminate union rights for public ...

10 posts - 4 authors - Last post: Feb 16

In the Assembly, John Jagler, spokesman for Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald (R- Horicon), also said the bill will pass. ...
catholicforum.fisheaters.com/index.php?topic=3436474.0 - Cached

Get more discussion results

 

http://politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2011/jan/14/jeff-fitzgerald/wisconsin-assembly-speaker-jeff-fitzgerald-says-ir/

 

Even the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Politico (edited by Walker’s old college buddy, Greg Borowski), is back pedaling and “sort of” calling things false when they really ARE.  EXCEPT, that you will notice that they like to call Republican claims to be “barely true”, while calling Democratic claims to be FALSE, for the most part.  If you are familiar with FRAMING you should be aware that “barely” is a term which is an intangible, complex concept which DOESN’T REGISTER in people who DON’T THINK and can’t REASON, so they don’t SEE the “barely” part and only see the TRUE part, once again, slyly SUPPORTING Republicans, even when they very, superficially APPEAR to be calling them on their lies.

 

But in the debate between Governor Walker and his Republican Legislative shills for the Koch Brothers and Corporations, have clearly shown their hands and demonstrated that they are clearly biased in their reporting, by failing to report the truth, or show the transcripts of the tape between Governor Walker and whom he thought to be David Koch, his multi-billionaire puppet master. 

 

TMJ4 Television reporters failed to report the part about how the Governor was CLEARLY not interested in negotiating or debating with the State Senate Democrats, but rather had planned to ambush them, by having a vote after they showed up, using the fact that they had showed up at the beginning of the day, so the State Senate would be considered as having a quorum, even if the State Senators were to leave the building before the vote took place.

 

They failed to report the part about how the fake David Koch had offered Walker a “good time in Cali” after this was all done.  That is clearly an offer of a BRIBE in exchange for SERVICES RENDERED BY THE GOVERNOR.  That is ILLEGAL, whether the bribe actually had money exchanged hands or not.  Remember Rod Blagojevich?

 

Instead, they repeatedly played Walker’s talking points to make it appear as if he was being reasonable, when the facts demonstrate that what he was doing was anything BUT reasonable.

 

TMJ4 and their sister Radio Station WTMJ4 should be boycotted and all of their commercial advertisers should be boycotted as well.

 

CNN, FOX News and MSNBC NEWS (the “News” part of the network, not the “Cable News” part that actually DID cover it with Rachel Maddow and the Ed Show, and Lawrence O’Donnell), IGNORED 100,000 protesters at the Capitol in Madison on Feb 26, 2011.  This was a concerted, coordinated MEDIA BLACKOUT.

 

http://www.politicususa.com/en/cnn-fox-msnbc-ignore-wi

Over 100,000 people in Madison, Wisconsin were joined by thousands of other Americans around the country in protest of Gov. Scott Walker’s attempt to strip collective bargaining rights from the state’s unionized workers, but you would not have known any of this if you watched cable news on Saturday as the coverage of the protests ranged from disappointing (MSNBC) to scant (CNN) to non-existent (Fox News).

By March 1, 2011, the Koch Brothers had spent $400,000 in pro-Walker and anti-Union commercials.

 

http://www.onewisconsinnow.org/blog/2010/09/koch-brothers-fill-up-walkers-campaign-tank.html

 

“The Koch Brothers Right Wing extremist Americans for Prosperity front group is there to break the Unions and funnel more money and power to the Koch Brothers, with the assistance of the gullible.  The Koch brothers company’s are among the nation’s worst polluters. They are so extreme they want to abolish Social Security, the minimum wage, Medicare, environmental legislation and virtually any other legislation that helps the nation’s working middle class. And today Walker will pursue this agenda by gutting education and local government funding by $1 billion.”   Larry Miller’s Blog

 

Reasons to protest TMJ4:
-The continual usage of “Capitol Chaos” as a headline for EVERYTHING (just look at the website, it’s ridiculous)
-Using right wing conservatives to do reporting
-lack of investigation i.e. when reporting on the Koch brothers

Here’s what one comment reads on the FB event page:
“Charlie Sykes on WTMJ represents the worst of all possible journalistic pretenders. With total disregard for the truth, he used his place of positional power to distort the facts, mislead the voters, and gloat because his friends won.”

Any assistance in compiling a list of their commercial advertisers would be appreciated.  Please send the list of advertisers and DOCUMENTATION to Chair5thCDDPW@gmail.com

 

 

     Republicans love to point out that President John F. Kennedy reduced individual Federal tax rates when he was in office, (the misrepresentation is pushed by the Koch Brother’s financed Heritage Foundation, but they don’t bother to explain WHY.   (They also forget that the corporate tax rate during his time in office was 52% versus the current 35%).

 

      They ignore the fact that the President BEFORE HIM, President Dwight D. Eisenhower ( Republican ) had kept taxes on the rich at 91% of earnings!  Wow! A Republican President who actually UNDERSTOOD ECONOMICS? 

 

      Here’s what they ALSO aren’t telling you.  Immediately after World War II, which basically emptied the America’s bank account to pay for the ships, planes, tanks, trucks, weapons, ammunition, oil, rubber, training, feeding and supplying the troops, EVERYONE WAS BROKE, INCLUDING THE BANKS.  In fact, they were BROKE BEFORE THE WAR, REMEMBER?  We had just come out of the Great Depression, which had lasted for ten years.

 

      The U.S. Government couldn’t tax the poor or the middle class, because THEY DIDN’T HAVE ANY MONEY.  The ONLY people with money were those who had been born into it, and weathered through the Great Depression and the war, or the war profiteers, who made BILLIONS by supplying all of those materials for the war.  Materials which the U.S. TAXPAYERS had paid for. 

     

      So, instead of keeping average working people POOR, and the war profiteers RICH, very high taxes were levied against the people who had profited the most FROM the war, so that money could be REDISTRIBUTED back to the working people, who made it possible for us to win the war in the first place, those who PAID for the war in the first place.  You know - the troops who fought the war, and the people who worked in the manufacturing plants who MADE everything needed to win the war.

 

      That redistribution CREATED the middle class, because they were the people who made the products that people around the world needed.  Why?  Because most industrial capacity had been completely destroyed in most of the countries involved in the war, and we were the only country unscathed enough to still be able to produce those products FOR THEM.

  

      Once the middle class got back on their feet, and were ABLE to pay their share of taxes, A DEMOCRAT, JFK, reduced the taxes on the RICH, TWICE, bringing that top rate down to about 77%, and then again to about 71% (which was enacted after his assassination), and re-distributed it FAIRLY so that the middle class, who were now in a position to pay their fair share, could also pay their taxes.

 

      Ronald Reagan dropped the top marginal tax rate from 70% to 28% and we had several recessions under his administration as a result, job losses and lack of job creation followed, and got so bad that when George H.W. Bush (remember “read my lips, no new taxes”? ), was President he was forced to raise taxes to keep the economy from crashing.  He had terrible job creation rates, averaging about 645,000 jobs per year in office.  George W. Bush cut taxes TWICE, with the largest tax cuts in the HISTORY of the U.S. and only averaged 350,000 jobs created per year in office.  (You need to create at least 150,000 jobs per MONTH to keep up with just the population increase to keep the employment percentage RATES EVEN.  By that metric, he lost 11.4 MILLION jobs during his administration.)

   

      Bill Clinton raised taxes and he had the largest job creation rate in the HISTORY of the United States, of 2.9 MILLION per year, or 23.2 MILLION jobs over the course of his eight years in office.

 

      But Republicans didn’t like that, because IT WASN’T ENOUGH FOR THEM.

 

      In the years since, the top tax rate has been dropped to 35% both for corporations and the rich, but if you’ve been paying attention, you should be aware already that 2/3rds of the corporations in the U.S. DON’T PAY ANY FEDERAL OR STATE INCOME TAXES, and many of those who do, have been using accounting tricks to fraudulently reduce their taxes so they don’t pay their fair share either.

 

      The rich also don’t pay their fair share.  Even though the very rich have seen their income increase by 4500%, while the working class and middle class have seen NO REAL INCREASE over that same period of time, the Rich have seen their taxes reduced, while taxes on the working class and the middle class have increased in proportion to what the rich are NOT paying.  The rich only pay what they CLAIM to have earned, because there are no tracking procedures in place to accurately identify what they actually EARN, unlike what they do with wage or salary earners, who are taxed on every dime they earn.  And even on the income that they are KNOWN to have earned, their REAL rate of taxation is not the 35% they complain about, but rather around 6% to 16%.  But they want to con you into believing that because SOME individuals actually pay those high rates, that ALL of them do.  It is so difficult for the IRS to track the income of the rich, and particularly the super rich, because it is so complicated, that the IRS had to buy a super computer to audit Bill Gates’ income taxes!!!

 

      When George W. Bush was president, he gutted the IRS’s investigative auditors who were directed at studying the income tax returns of the very rich, and then directed that they instead go after THE MIDDLE CLASS.

 

      How many middle class income earners at about $50,000 annual income, would have to be audited in order to find enough taxes owed to make up for those taxes owed and not paid by ONE MULTI-BILLIONAIRE?  Let’s make a quick comparison.  At a 30% income tax rate, their federal income taxes would be $15,000.  So even if all of the middle income earners investigated didn’t pay ANY of their taxes at all, then how many of them would have to be caught to make up for the taxes not paid by just ONE multi-Billionaire?

 

      At a 35% income tax rate for the multi-billionaire, or their corporation, making $100 Billion annually, like the Koch Brothers, who DON’T PAY ANY CORPORATE FEDERAL OR STATE INCOME TAXES, that would make $35 Billion annually for Federal taxes and around $6 Billion for State Taxes or a total of around $41 Billion ANNUALLY.

 

      So, dividing that $41 BILLION owed by ONE multi-billion dollar corporation which funnels most of that income directly to the owners, executives and shareholders while it isn’t being audited or taxed, by $15,000 which each individual earning $50,000 would need to pay in Federal taxes ALONE, would be 2,733,333 taxpayers found to NOT BE PAYING THEIR Federal Taxes AT ALL.

      

      If you look at ONLY the $35 Billion in Federal taxes not paid by the Koch Corporation, you would still need to find 2,333,333 middle class taxpayers who didn’t pay their federal taxes AT ALL, to make up the revenue losses of ONE Billionaire’s corporate shell.

 

      And the Koch Brothers are the third richest people in the United States and 24th richest in the world.

 

      Exxon-Mobil is THE richest corporation in the world and doesn’t pay ANYTHING in Federal or State Income taxes to the U.S., as most of the oil companies doing business in this country or headquartered in the U.S. do not.  In the last decade, the top five oil companies have socked away $1 TRILLION in PROFITS, but for the most part, don’t pay ANYTHING in Federal or State income taxes!!!

 

( And before anyone complains that I’m comparing Billionaire corporate income to individual income taxes, let me remind you that multi-billionaires create layers upon layers of shell corporations to shield their income, so that investigators don’t find out how much they actually earn, and many of those are Subchapter S corporations which take corporate income and funnel it directly into the owner’s individual income, so they can avoid corporate income taxes all-together, just like newly elected Senator Ron Johnson has done with PACUR.  His corporation pays nothing in Federal or State income taxes.  The income was funneled directly to him, so that the over $9 million in earnings in the past few years, somehow miraculously only resulted in less than a 6% individual tax rate based on what he actually PAID.  No federal or state income taxes for the corporation, and only less than 6% tax rate paid as an individual.  And he’s complaining that his taxes are too high?)

 

      And how many taxpayers would have to be audited to find that many taxpayers not paying their Federal Taxes at all?

 

      Well there are only about 1.4 million audits performed IN TOTAL each year, only about 310,000 of those are field audits, the remaining are correspondence audits – letters trough the mail indicating that an error had been made on your return.  The vast majority of tax returns are honest returns, where the highest majority of tax cheats comes from the very, very rich.  The very people for whom George W. Bush took the tax auditors OFF of their cases.  Now you know why George W. Bush called the richest of the rich, his BASE.

 

      You would have to FIND TWICE as may middle class tax cheats as all the audits performed in one year, to make up for just ONE multi-billion dollar tax cheat!

 

      Only 1 - 1.5% of all taxpayers at all Federal Tax Brackets are ever audited in one year.  http://www.wwwebtax.com/audits/audit_avoiding.htm

 

IRS Audit Statistics

Income for Tax Returns

Tax Returns Filed

Tax Returns Examined

Percent Examined

Less Than $25,000

59,211,700

1,076,945

.81%

$25,000 to $50,000

27,263,000

259,794

.58%

$50,000 to $100,000

17,019,200

196,582

.62%

Greater Than 100,000

4,540,800

129,320

1.66%

 

 

 

 

 

     According to the IRS Oversight Board 2008 Taxpayer Attitude Survey, the response to their question “How much, if any, do you think is an acceptable amount to cheat on your income taxes?” was 89 percent saying “not at all”, with 6 percent responding “a little here and there”. Only 3 percent answered “as much as possible”.

 

     That response almost directly correlates with the VERY HIGHEST INCOME EARNERS NOT paying as much of their taxes as actually owed, while the vast majority of honest taxpayers, the lowest income earners are HONEST, and PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE.

             

     40% of all income earners in the United States pay no income taxes at all.  And the majority of the taxes OWED, is owed by the highest income earners.

   

     Your tax increases are not necessarily in actual “taxes” but in fees and charges for services that would have otherwise been paid for by your tax dollars.  You pay more for your driver’s licenses.  You pay more for filing forms with different federal agencies.  You pay more for LOCAL services, because there isn’t enough money coming back from the Federal Government to pay for those local services, and the local governments raise their taxes or charge you fees for the use of those services.  You pay more for fishing and hunting licenses, vehicle licenses and more.  And local fire departments are now resorting to charging fees to the people who need their services on a per incident basis. Charging the individuals (or their families) who were injured or killed or suffered damages, often through no fault of their own for services rendered.

 

     And the rich?  According to REPUBLICAN Politicians OWN ADMISSIONS, the RICH have been hiding their wealth illegally, overseas in tax haven bank accounts to evade paying taxes.  And the tax havens were created BY REPUBLICANS who WROTE the tax laws, and knew HOW to evade them.  UBS, run by co-director of the North America/U.S. Branch, former Senator Phil Gramm, had over 50,000 of these accounts in their one bank alone.  There are HUNDREDS of these banks set up in 70 countries in all continents except Antarctica.

 

And, by Republican politician’s own admissions, THEY KNOW HOW MUCH has been illegally hidden.  Between $12 TRILLION and $20 TRILLION.  Anywhere from an entire years worth of everything the U.S. produces in ONE YEAR, to that of 1 and 3/4s years.

 

At 35% of ONE YEAR’S Federal Income taxes on $12 Trillion socked away by rich scofflaws, amounts to $4.2 TRILLION dollars of taxes that aren’t being collected.  If you did the same for the $20 Trillion figure, you would be looking at $7.5 TRILLION, AND THAT IS ONLY FOR ONE YEAR!!!  And it isn’t even considering the state income taxes!  At 6%, and $12 Trillion, for one year, would be $720 BILLION, which is over 4 TIMES what the total states debts are for the entire country ($175 Billion).  And at 6% and $20 Trillion for ONE YEAR of state income taxes would be $1.2 TRILLION, or 11.4 TIMES the total states debts are for the entire country.

 

And you wonder WHY our country is BROKE?  What was that again about how it is the worker’s fault for the economy being bad?

 

So, now House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Republican), is trying to reduce taxes on money that corporations earn outside of this country (an estimated $1 Trillion), so that these corporations will “repatriate” that money to help our economy.  http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/4889062

 

Here’s the problem with that. 

 

First of all, he wants to drop the tax rate on those earnings down to about 5% from the current $35% rate.  But how can you tell the difference between actual EARNINGS from overseas business, versus, smuggling in money that has been held in secret, illegal tax accounts for decades?  But isn’t that the REASON he is doing this?  To make it possible for the rich tax scofflaws to bring back the money they hid for so long, and not have to pay any taxes on it, or penalties, AND bring it all back so they can take advantage of all the going out of business sales, so they can buy up businesses and assets in the country for pennies on the dollar??!!!

 

Here’s the other problem with that.

 

Once the super rich start bringing all that money back, without paying their fair share of taxes on it, they are going to flood the economy with CHEAP MONEY, and will cause INFLATION to go through the roof.  That means that those of you who earned your money LEGALLY, and PAID YOUR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES, are going to have to pay a LOT MORE for anything you want to buy, which means that once again, the value of YOUR SAVINGS and EARNINGS plummets.

 

Aren’t you tired enough of that roller coaster yet?

 

So, why do you keep voting Republicans in, who keep doing it to you!!!

 

     Asked If Bank of America Paying Nothing in Corporate Taxes Is Fair, Pawlenty Responds: Taxes Are "Too High"
Lee Fang, ThinkProgress: "Last weekend, Americans around the country organized 'Main Street Movement' protests to stand in solidarity with organized labor and demand that corporate interests pay their fair share. As ThinkProgress has reported, many of the nation's largest corporate interests pay literally nothing in corporate income taxes. ExxonMobil made nearly $20 billion in profits in 2009, but paid nothing in corporate income taxes. Other extremely profitable companies GE, CitiGroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Boeing similarly have had entire quarters or years without paying corporate income taxes."
Read the Article

     

The Koch Brothers, who own Koch Industries (coal, gas, oil pipelines and power plants), as well as Georgia Pacific (lumber and paper products), take in $100 BILLION in PROFITS every single year.  THEY PAY NOTHING IN CORPORATE FEDERAL OR STATE INCOME TAXES!!!

 

That amounts to $35 BILLION in Federal Taxes UNPAID, and $6 BILLION in State taxes UNPAID EACH YEAR.

 

Do you know how many middle class taxpayers would have to be found to make up those revenue losses?  DO THE MATH.

 

The HIGH Average Middle income worker, makes $50,000 average income, paying $15,000 in federal income taxes.  That means that it would require that the IRS find 2,333,333 of these workers NOT PAYING ANY OF THEIR TAXES to make up for just ONE corporation like Koch's not paying their income taxes, to make up for the lost revenues because that ONE corporation didn't pay their fair share of FEDERAL taxes ALONE.

 

The IRS only sends out 1.4 million audits A YEAR, 1 million of those are correspondence audits which only tell taxpayers that an error has been made on their returns. 310,000 of those are in person audits.  The total number of IRS audits every year is about HALF of what they would need to find high middle class income earners as NOT PAYING ANY TAXES AT ALL, for just ONE multi-billion dollar corporation!

 

But the largest amounts of taxes not paid doesn't come from the middle class or lower class earners.  In fact, they are honest, and PAY their taxes for the most part.  It is the RICH and the CORPORATIONS that evade their taxes and passes that burden onto the Middle class, because the poor don't have much money to begin with, and the Middle Class is the only group left to pay those taxes!!!

 

And there are literally Hundreds of THOUSANDS (actually more than 1.2 million in 2005), of foreign and U.S. corporations not paying their Federal or State Income Taxes.  A full 2/3rds of ALL corporations in the U.S., foreign and domestic, don't pay ANY CORPORATE INCOME TAXES BECAUSE OF TAX LOOP HOLES OR COVERUPS made possible by THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

 

More than 38,000 foreign corporations had no tax liability in 2005 and 1.2 million U.S. companies paid no income tax, the GAO said. Combined, the companies had $2.5 trillion in sales. About 25 percent of the U.S. corporations not paying corporate taxes were considered large corporations, meaning they had at least $250 million in assets or $50 million in receipts.

 

The GAO said it analyzed data from the Internal Revenue Service, examining samples of corporate returns for the years 1998 through 2005. For 2005, for example, it reviewed 110,003 tax returns from among more than 1.2 million corporations doing business in the U.S.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/12/representation-without-ta_n_118455.html

 

 

And given that it takes 2.3 MILLION High middle class income earners to be found not paying any taxes at all to make up for the loss of just ONE multi-billion dollar corporation, like Koch Industries, which rakes in $100 BILLION annually and pays NO corporate federal or state income taxes!  How many do you think it would take to make up for the hundreds of thousands of corporations and wealthy individuals who aren't paying their fair share?

 

The IRS only audits 1.4 million tax returns each year.  Only 310,000 of those are in person audits.  The rest are nothing more than letters informing taxpayers that their returns were incorrect.  In other words, in order to make up for JUST ONE CORPORATION (Koch Industries), NOT PAYING THEIR SHARE OF TAXES, you would need to INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE IRS, and INCREASE in-person audits by 7.4 TIMES what they are currently auditing (assuming that they are all making $50,000 or more and not paying a dime towards taxes), AND catch 100% of them for not paying any taxes AT ALL.  If they didn't catch 100% of the people they audited for not paying any taxes on $50,000 or more, they would need to expand the size of their audit pool.  But the facts are that most middle income workers PAY their taxes.  It is the RICH and the CORPORATIONS which have repeatedly shown that they are illegally evading taxes and dumping more of that responsibility onto those who DO pay their taxes. 

 

Under George W. Bush, IRS taxpayer compliance resources were re-directed away from auditing the super rich, and instead focused on more middle-class Americans and small businesses, and even going after the poor.  That guaranteed that more of the super-rich would get away with their tax evasion, and that more money would be spent by the agency in chasing smaller amounts of tax revenue from people who were even less likely to actually owe them.  And even if they did owe taxes, the amount collected as a result of spending the time, money and resources investigating and prosecuting them, would be far less than what they could have collected had they gone after someone who owed Billions of dollars rather than a few thousands of dollars.

 

AND THEY KNEW THAT THE RICH WERE MORE LIKELY TO CHEAT ON THEIR TAXES! 

 

http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/

http://money.msn.com/tax-tips/post.aspx?post=47e28bbf-7d9d-48a5-93f8-36503a046234

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/AvoidAnAudit/the-biggest-tax-cheats-rich-folks.aspx

 

And the Republican Party is responsible for creating tax havens for the wealthy.  They have publicly stated that between $12 Trillion and $20 Trillion has been hidden in secret, illegal bank accounts for tax evaders overseas.  That is 1 - 1.75 TIMES what the total value of ALL production of goods and services in the U.S. for ONE YEAR is worth!!

 

(The $12 Trillion and $20 Trillion figures came out during the Republican Primary Debates for their Presidential Candidates in 2008 by Governor Mike Huckabee, and by Republican Congressmen on the House floor when they were arguing against TARP in 2008-2009, claiming that allowing "repatriation" of these funds by eliminating taxes and penalties on the tax scofflaws, would allow a flood of money to come back into the United States.  There WAS a Tax Amnesty allowed by Obama and the Democrats in Congress, but what happened as a result was only a tiny number of people and money coming back into the country compared to what Republicans promised.  Why?  Because the wealthy argued that their accounts were so well hidden, that it would be impossible for authorities to FIND THEM!)

 

 

The maximum tax rate of 35% for corporations and the wealthy applied to $12 Trillion in funds hidden for tax evasion would be $4.2 TRILLION in ONE YEAR'S LOST Federal revenues alone.  Apply that to $20 Trillion, and you get $7 TRILLION in ONE YEAR's LOST Federal revenues.  That more than balances the budget and eliminates the entire Federal Debt and Deficit in only one to two years!

 

And what about State Income taxes that weren't paid?  At only 6% State Income Tax rates, $12 Trillion would yield $720 BILLION in unpaid State Income Taxes.  $20 Trillion would yield $1.2 TRILLION in unpaid State Income Taxes for ONE YEAR.

 

The total for all states debts currently stands at $175 BILLION.  That is a TINY FRACTION of what is owed by the Corporations and the Wealthy who DON'T PAY THEIR TAXES.

 

How would they know the total amounts if the accounts are secret?  Because they helped to set them up!

 

Remember former Senator Phil Gramm, co-Director for UBS America, who was the Chief Economic Advisor to Senator John McCain during his run for the Presidency in 2008?  His company was found GUILTY for soliciting wealthy Americans to hide their income in overseas accounts to evade taxes.  And that is just ONE bank out of hundreds that are set up in 70 countries to evade taxes!!!

 

And you wonder WHY YOUR taxes are so high?

    

     Confronting the Front Groups Backing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker
Lisa Graves, PRWatch: "A gaggle of secretly funded DC groups has launched an expensive PR blitz in Wisconsin in support of Scott Walker's controversial efforts to undermine union rights, part of a national assault on worker rights. A few employee unions have also begun running ads, but their sources (employee dues) are not kept hidden from public view. The total amount of anti-union spending in the works by groups funded by corporations or corporate CEOs or their foundations is unknown. What is known is that many such groups hide behind tax provisions that allow them to keep the identities of their major funders secret, insulating from public scrutiny the wealthy financial interests they are fronting and that are largely bankrolling their general operations."

     Read the Article

     In 2007, more than a full year before the stock market crash of September 17, 2008, (the day that Senator John McCain proclaimed that "the Nation's economy was strong" in the morning, and then revised that to "the nation is in economic crisis" in the afternoon), 56% of ALL "investment" trades were SHORTS - BETTING ON FAILURES, and companies LOSING value!

     So, if INVESTORS KNEW the crash was coming, why didn't the Bush Administration?  Well, actually they DID KNOW!  They just LIED TO THE PUBLIC about how well things were going so they could get you to buy JUNK at exorbitant prices, so the "investors" who were holding the JUNK, could DUMP it on the unsuspecting public, would have an "Authority" telling you that it was safe and a good investment.  A Bush Administration spokesperson at the time of the crash, spilled the beans, and told the press that they had a plan in place to deal with the economic crisis, and had been working on it for MONTHS, even though THEY NEVER INFORMED THE U.S. CONGRESS of their knowledge of the impending crash, nor gave them advance warning so they could create intelligent, well crafted legislation or strategies to deal with it, but rather forced them to do what Bush's U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson (former Goldman Saks CEO), wanted them to do, with few restrictions.  That bailed out the banks and insurance companies, but left small businesses needing credit, without access to it.

     http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4SNNT_enUS334US357&q=Hank+Paulson

     Now, in a recent public statements, Hank Paulson is sounding like the "socialist" whom Republicans so love to hate.  He's telling us what should be done to get out of this economic problem DUE TO LACK OF SUFFICIENT REGULATIONS, and petty bickering in the U.S. Congress, by Republicans, primarily to score political points; and Democrats who tried to make it appear as if they actually got something significant accomplished, when they had actually been blocked from getting much accomplished at all.  Yes, they did prevent the immediate economic crash at the time, but the problem is that the causes behind the crash are still in place, and Republicans in Congress are fighting to insure that they STAY IN PLACE.

     And in 2010, gullible American voters fell for Republican lies and voted them back into power, on the hollow promises that job creation was job one.  So, how well did they follow through on THAT promise?  They haven't created any jobs so far, and, in fact, most of their actions have served to SLASH JOBS across the country. 

     Too bad Paulson didn't DO the things he is telling us SHOULD BE DONE when he was in a position to do it.  Perhaps he is just trying to protect his actions from historical criticism by telling us the facts NOW, when he failed to actually DO what he needed to do THEN.  So, now that he is finally saying publicly, the things he SHOULD HAVE SAID AND DONE when he was Treasury Secretary under Bush, would he do the job if given another chance under OBAMA, or would he just use that position to screw us again?  

     http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/hank-paulson-ex-goldman-s_b_824573.html

     http://www.buffalobeast.com/?p=5045

     BUSTED!  SCOTT WALKER SPILLS THE BEANS WHEN HE GETS PUNKED AND THINKS HE IS SPEAKING TO DAVID KOCH, (his BILLIONAIRE benefactor, who along with his brother are both worth $21 BILLION each, and their businesses took in $100 BILLION last year – Georgia Pacific, Koch Pipeline Company LLC, as well as having massive holdings in coal and gas – they took in $11 BILLION from Wisconsin last year after laying off 25% of their workers), ON THE PHONE

 

     The full transcript can be found here: http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html

 

 

     BOYCOTT Georgia Pacific PRODUCTS:

 

     Dixie Cups

     Brawny Paper Towels

     Sparkle

     Quilted Northern Bathroom Tissue

     Angel Soft

Soft 'n Gentle toilet paper

     Mardi Gras

     Zee

     Vanity Fair

 

 

 

     Georgia Pacific Lumber

    

Thanks to ferallike for the great detailed list of GP building products:

Georgia Pacific Building products

Dense Armor Drywall and Decking
ToughArmor Gypsum board
Georgia pacific Plytanium Plywood
Flexrock
Densglass sheathing
G/P Industrial plasters (some products used by a lot of crafters)-
   Agricultural Plaster
   Arts & Crafts Plaster
   Dental Plaster
   General Purpose Plaster
   Glass-reinforced Gypsum (GRG)
   Industrial Tooling Plaster
   Investment Casting Plaster
   Medical Plaster
   Metal Casting Plaster
   Pottery Plaster

FibreStrong Rim board
G/P Lam board
Blue Ribbon OSB Rated Sheathing
Blue Ribbon Sub-floor
DryGuard Enhanced OSB
Nautilus Wall Sheathing
Thermostat OSB Radiant Barrier Sheathing
Broadspan Engineered Wood Products
XJ 85 I-Joists
FireDefender Banded Cores
FireDefender FS
FireDefender Mineral Core
Hardboard and Thin MDF including Auto Hardboard,
Perforated Hardboard and Thin MDF
Wood Fiberboard -
Commercial Roof Fiberboard
Hushboard Sound Deadening Board
Regular Fiberboard Sheathing
Structural Fiberboard Sheathing

     Georgia-Pacific paper products and envelopes

Thanks to enhydra lutris for the additional products/brands by INVISTA:

COMFOREL® fiberfill
COOLMAX® fabric
CORDURA® fabric
DACRON® fiber
POLYSHIELD® resin
SOLARMAX® fabric
SOMERELLE® bedding products
STAINMASTER® carpet
SUPPLEX® fabric
TACTEL® fiber
TACTESSE® carpet fiber
TERATE® polyols
TERATHANE® polyether glycol
THERMOLITE® fabric
PHENREZ® resin
POLARGUARD® fiber and
LYCRA® fiber

For anyone who is against boycotts because they don't want to lose the jobs, consider the following:

 

1) If you haven't been paying attention - you've been losing the jobs, benefits, pensions, healthcare etc... ANYHOW.  Stop feeding them your hard earned cash to use against you.

2) They don't pay any corporate Federal or State Income Taxes, so that increases YOUR TAX burden.  Shifting your purchases to companies who lawfully pay their taxes, REDUCES YOUR tax burdens.

3) They take BILLIONS of dollars of their profits OUT of WISCONSIN every year.  Spend your money with companies who KEEP THEIR MONEY HERE.  Those who, instead, re-invest in the State and our Communities.

4) If we BREAK Georgia Pacific and companies like it, they will be forced to SELL their operations, because they won't be profitable for their shareholders anymore.

5) When they are forced to SELL their operations, we have the opportunity to have a more socially responsible company buy them out, or perhaps even turn it into Employee Owned operations, so that the employees can work for themselves, and be paid fairly for their labors; rather than shipping all the profits onto the owners and shareholders who take all the profits for themselves. 

 

Scott Walker Contributors - The 10 Grand Club

This page lists people that made the maxiumum legal annual contribution, $10,000, to Scott Walker for Governor in 2009 or 2010, listed alphabetically by employer.

NOTE: I added John Mellowes (Charter Manufacturing), Ted Nickel (Church Mutual Insurance), Bladen Burns (Fiduciary Management), and Craig Leopold (Minnesota Wild) as "junior" members that didn't quite make it into the club, but can redeem themselves by fetching drinks and doing other errands for the full members.

Source: WisDC.org: Walker 2009-2010 Contributors | Back to Index

   amount   | year |             employer             |      contributor       |            city            |             interest             
------------+------+----------------------------------+------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------------
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | AMK Concepts & Services          | Katz, Arnold           | Bryn Mawr, PA 19010        | Insurance
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | AMK Concepts & Services          | Katz, Rosalind         | Bryn Mawr, PA 19010        | Insurance
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Atlantic DQ                      | Rezek, Garth M         | Woodbridge, VA 22192       | Business
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Baraboo Growth                   | Strong, Donna          | Brookfield, WI 53005       | Banking & Finance
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Brian Retzlaff Trucking          | Retzlaff, Brian        | Berlin, WI 54923           | Transportation
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Burke Properties                 | Burke, John J          | Fox Point, WI 53217        | Real Estate
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Carpenter                        | Kuester, Jonathan      | Watertown, WI 53098        | Construction
  $9,500.00 | 2010 | Charter Manufacturing            | Mellowes, John A       | Mequon, WI 53092           | Manufacturing & Distributing
  $9,755.00 | 2010 | Church Mutual Insurance          | Nickel, Ted            | Merrill, WI 54452          | Insurance
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Commonwealth Development Corp... | Lange, Louie           | Fond du Lac, WI 54937      | Real Estate
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | County Concrete                  | Sonnentag, Rebecca     | Marathon, WI 54448         | Construction
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Custom Pak Products              | Berg, James R          | Hartford, WI 53027         | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Fabco Equipment Inc              | Fabick, Jere C         | Oconomowoc, WI 53066       | Road Construction
  $9,500.00 | 2010 | Fiduciary Management             | Burns, Bladen J        | Wauwatosa, WI 53213        | Banking & Finance
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | First American Funding           | Eisenga, Mike          | Columbus, WI 53925         | Banking & Finance
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Hammes Co                        | Hammes, Jon D          | Mequon, WI 53092           | Real Estate
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Holton Brothers Construction     | Holton, Thomas N       | Grafton, WI 53024          | Construction
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Hy Cite Corp                     | Johnson, Erik          | Middleton, WI 53562        | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Hy Cite Corp                     | Johnson, Peter         | McFarland, WI 53558        | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Hy Cite Corp                     | Johnson, Peter O       | Madison, WI 53713          | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | I-Robot                          | Frink, Kevin           | Peterborough, NH 03458     | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Johnsonville Foods               | Stayer, Shelly A       | Fond du Lac, WI 54935      | Manufacturing & Distributing
  $9,100.00 | 2009 | Minnesota Wild                   | Leipold, Craig L       | Racine, WI 53403           | Tourism/Leisure/Entertainment
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Nova Surgical LLC                | Stevovich, Louis       | Downers Grove, IL 60516    | Health Services/Institutions
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | PACUR                            | Johnson, Ronald H      | Oshkosh, WI 54901          | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Panduit Corp                     | Caveney, Jack          | North Palm Beach, FL 33408 | Telecommunications & Computers
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Pinstripe Inc                    | Marks, Susan J         | New Berlin, WI 53146       | Business
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Retired                          | Healy, Elaine F        | Peterborough, NH 03458     | Retired/Homemakers/Non-income...
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Retired                          | Healy, Richard         | Peterborough, NH 03458     | Retired/Homemakers/Non-income...
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Retired                          | Kasten, Susan W        | River Hills, WI 53217      | Retired/Homemakers/Non-income...
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Retired                          | Lynch, Donald R        | Whitefish Bay, WI 53211    | Retired/Homemakers/Non-income...
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Rite Hite Corp                   | White, Michael & Cathy | River Hills, WI 53217      | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Rite Hite Corp                   | White, Michael H       | River Hills, WI 53217      | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Roehl Transport                  | Roehl, Dolores         | Marshfield, WI 54449       | Transportation
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | SC Johnson & Sons*               | Perez, William D*      | Chicago, IL 60610          | Manufacturing & Distributing
 $10,000.00 | 2009 | Standard Process Laboratories    | Dubois, Charles        | Oconomowoc, WI 53066       | Health Services/Institutions
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | St John Properties Inc           | St John, Edward        | Baltimore, MD 21244        | Real Estate
 $10,000.00 | 2010 | Wausau Homes                     | Schuette, Jay          | Sugar Grove, IL 60554      | Construction

*William Perez has not been at SC Johnson for years, and should not have been identified as an SC Johnson employee. SC Johnson is NOT on the official boycott list because of this. However, Craig Leipold's (Minnesota Wild) $10,000 donation is effectively SC Johnson, through marriage.

Sam Hokin, Facebook: Boycott Scott Walker Contributors

Last modified: Thu Mar 24 11:30:06 CDT 2011

 

 

 

Koch Whore

Posted by Murphy On February - 23 - 2011

 

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker answers his master’s call

“David Koch”: We’ll back you any way we can. What we were thinking about the crowd was, uh, was planting some troublemakers.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker: You know, well, the only problem with that—because we thought about that…

***

WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS IS REAL. NO NAMES HAVE BEEN CHANGED TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT. THERE ARE NO INNOCENT.
-MURPHY

***

“He’s just hard-lined—will not talk, will not communicate, will not return phone calls.”
-Wisconsin state Sen. Tim Carpenter (D) on Gov. Walker (
source)

Carpenter’s quote made me wonder: who could get through to Gov. Walker? Well, what do we know about Walker and his proposed union-busting, no-bid budget? The obvious candidate was David Koch.

I first called at 11:30 am CST, and eventually got through to a young, male receptionist who, upon hearing the magic name Koch, immediately transferred me to Executive Assistant Governor Dorothy Moore.

“We’ve met before, Dorothy,” I nudged. “I really need to talk to Scott—Governor Walker.” She said that, yes, she thought she had met Koch, and that the name was “familiar.” But she insisted that Walker was detained in a meeting and couldn’t get away. She asked about the nature of my call. I balked, “I just needed to speak with the Governor. He knows what this is about,” I said. She told me to call back at noon, and she’d have a better idea of when he would be free.

I called at noon and was quickly transferred to Moore, who then transferred me to Walker’s Chief of Staff Keith Gilkes. He was “expecting my call.”

“David!” he said with an audible smile.

I politely said hello, not knowing how friendly Gilkes and Koch may be. He was eager to help. “I was really hoping to talk directly to Scott,” I said. He said that could be arranged and that I should just leave my number. I explained to Gilkes, “My goddamn maid, Maria, put my phone in the washer. I’d have her deported, but she works for next to nothing.” Gilkes found this amusing. “I’m calling from the VOID—with the VOID, or whatever it’s called. You know, the Snype!”

“Gotcha,” Gilkes said. “Let me check the schedule here…OK, there’s an opening at 2 o’clock Central Standard Time. Just call this same number and we’ll put you through.”

Could it really be that easy? Yes. What follows is a rushed, abridged transcript of my—I mean, David Koch’s conversation with Gov. Walker. Listen to the whole call here:

http://www.buffalobeast.com/?p=5045   LISTEN TO BOTH OF THE TAPES COMPLETELY, you can't expect the media to report this with any honesty or give you ALL of the information.  THEY HAVEN'T.  They WON'T.  Sorry, I wasn't able to post the actual tapes, but you can get to them at the link provided.

Walker: Hi; this is Scott Walker.

Koch: Scott! David Koch. How are you?

Walker: Hey, David! I’m good. And yourself?

Koch: I’m very well. I’m a little disheartened by the situation there, but, uh, what’s the latest?

Walker: Well, we’re actually hanging pretty tough. I mean—you know, amazingly there’s a much smaller group of protesters—almost all of whom are in from other states today. The State Assembly is taking the bill up—getting it all the way to the last point it can be at where it’s unamendable. But they’re waiting to pass it until the Senate’s—the Senate Democrats, excuse me, the assembly Democrats have about a hundred amendments they’re going through. The state Senate still has the 14 members missing but what they’re doing today is bringing up all sorts of other non-fiscal items, many of which are things members in the Democratic side care about. And each day we’re going to ratchet it up a little bit…. The Senate majority leader had a great plan he told about this morning—he told the Senate Democrats about and he’s going to announce it later today, and that is: The Senate organization committee is going to meet and pass a rule that says if you don’t show up for two consecutive days on a session day—in the state Senate, the Senate chief clerk—it’s a little procedural thing here, but—can actually have your payroll stopped from being automatically deducted—

Koch: Beautiful.

Walker: —into your checking account and instead—you still get a check, but the check has to be personally picked up and he’s instructing them—which we just loved—to lock them in their desk on the floor of the state Senate.

Koch: Now you’re not talking to any of these Democrat bastards, are you?

Walker: Ah, I—there’s one guy that’s actually voted with me on a bunch of things I called on Saturday for about 45 minutes, mainly to tell him that while I appreciate his friendship and he’s worked with us on other things, to tell him I wasn’t going to budge.

Koch: Goddamn right!

Walker: …his name is Tim Cullen—

Koch: All right, I’ll have to give that man a call.

Walker: Well, actually, in his case I wouldn’t call him and I’ll tell you why: he’s pretty reasonable but he’s not one of us…

Koch: Now who can we get to budge on this collective bargaining?

Walker: …I think the paycheck will have an impact…secondly, one of the things we’re looking at next…we’re still waiting on an opinion to see if the unions have been paying to put these guys up out of state. We think there’s at minimum an ethics violation if not an outright felony.

Koch: Well, they’re probably putting hobos in suits.

Walker: Yeah.

Koch: That’s what we do. Sometimes.

Walker: I mean paying for the senators to be put up. I know they’re paying for these guy—I mean, people can pay for protesters to come in and that’s not an ethics code, but, I mean, literally if the unions are paying the 14 senators—their food, their lodging, anything like that…[*** Important regarding his later acceptance of a Koch offer to “show him a good time.” ***]

[I was stunned. I am stunned. In the interest of expediting the release of this story, here are the juiciest bits:]

Walker: …I’ve got layoff notices ready…

Koch: Beautiful; beautiful. Gotta crush that union.

Walker: [bragging about how he doesn't budge]…I would be willing to sit down and talk to him, the assembly Democrat leader, plus the other two Republican leaders—talk, not negotiate and listen to what they have to say if they will in turn—but I’ll only do it if all 14 of them will come back and sit down in the state assembly…legally, we believe, once they’ve gone into session, they don’t physically have to be there. If they’re actually in session for that day, and they take a recess, the 19 Senate Republicans could then go into action and they’d have quorum…so we’re double checking that. If you heard I was going to talk to them that’s the only reason why. We’d only do it if they came back to the capital with all 14 of them…

Koch: Bring a baseball bat. That’s what I’d do.

Walker: I have one in my office; you’d be happy with that. I have a slugger with my name on it.

Koch: Beautiful.

Walker: [union-bashing...]

Koch: Beautiful.

Walker: So this is ground zero, there’s no doubt about it. [Talks about a “great” NYT piece of “objective journalism.” Talks about how most private blue-collar workers have turned against public, unionized workers.]…So I went through and called a handful, a dozen or so lawmakers I worry about each day and said, “Everyone, we should get that story printed out and send it to anyone giving you grief.”

Koch: Goddamn right! We, uh, we sent, uh, Andrew Breitbart down there.

Walker:Yeah.

Koch: Yeah.

Walker: Good stuff.

Koch: He’s our man, you know.

Walker: [blah about his press conferences, attacking Obama, and all the great press he's getting.] Brian [Sadoval], the new Governor of Nevada, called me the last night he said—he was out in the Lincoln Day Circuit in the last two weekends and he was kidding me, he said, “Scott, don’t come to Nevada because I’d be afraid you beat me running for governor.” That’s all they want to talk about is what are you doing to help the governor of Wisconsin. I talk to Kasich every day—John’s gotta stand firm in Ohio. I think we could do the same thing with Vic Scott in Florida. I think, uh, Snyder—if he got a little more support—probably could do that in Michigan. You start going down the list there’s a lot of us new governors that got elected to do something big.

Koch: You’re the first domino.

Walker: Yep. This is our moment.

Koch: Now what else could we do for you down there?

Walker: Well the biggest thing would be—and your guy on the ground [Americans For Prosperity president Tim Phillips] is probably seeing this [stuff about all the people protesting, and some of them flip him off].

[Abrupt end of first recording, and start of second.]

Walker: [Bullshit about doing the right thing and getting flipped off by “union bulls,” and the decreasing number of protesters. Or some such.]

Koch: We’ll back you any way we can. What we were thinking about the crowd was, uh, was planting some troublemakers.

Walker: You know, well, the only problem with that —because we thought about that. The problem—the, my only gut reaction to that is right now the lawmakers I’ve talked to have just completely had it with them, the public is not really fond of this…[explains that planting troublemakers may not work.] My only fear would be if there’s a ruckus caused is that maybe the governor has to settle to solve all these problems…[something about '60s liberals.]…Let ‘em protest all they want…Sooner or later the media stops finding it interesting.

Koch: Well, not the liberal bastards on MSNBC.

Walker: Oh yeah, but who watches that? I went on “Morning Joe” this morning. I like it because I just like being combative with those guys, but, uh. You know they’re off the deep end.

Koch: Joe—Joe’s a good guy. He’s one of us.

Walker: Yeah, he’s all right. He was fair to me…[bashes NY Senator Chuck Schumer, who was also on the program.]

Koch: Beautiful; beautiful. You gotta love that Mika Brzezinski; she’s a real piece of ass.

Walker: Oh yeah. [story about when he hung out with human pig Jim Sensenbrenner at some D.C. function and he was sitting next to Brzezinski and her father, and their guest was David Axelrod. He introduced himself.]

Koch: That son of a bitch!

Walker: Yeah no kidding huh?…

Koch: Well, good; good. Good catching up with ya’.

Walker: This is an exciting time [blah, blah, blah, Super Bowl reference followed by an odd story of pulling out a picture of Ronald Reagan and explaining to his staff the plan to crush the union the same way Reagan fired the air traffic controllers]…that was the first crack in the Berlin Wall because the Communists then knew Reagan wasn’t a pushover. [Blah, blah, blah. He's exactly like Reagan. Won't shut up about how awesome he is.]

Koch: [Laughs] Well, I tell you what, Scott: once you crush these bastards I’ll fly you out to Cali and really show you a good time.

Walker: All right, that would be outstanding. [*** Ethical violation much? ***] Thanks for all the support…it’s all about getting our freedoms back…

Koch: Absolutely. And, you know, we have a little bit of a vested interest as well. [Laughs]

Walker: [Blah] Thanks a million!

Koch: Bye-bye!

Walker: Bye.

***

So there you have it, kids. Government isn’t for the people. It’s for the people with money. You want to be heard? Too fucking bad. You want to collectively bargain? You can’t afford a seat at the table. You may have built that table. But it’s not yours.  It belongs to the Kochs and the oligarch class. It’s guarded by Republicans like Walker, and his Democratic counterparts across that ever-narrowing aisle that is corporate rule, so that the ever-widening gap between the haves and the have-nots can swallow all the power in the world. These are known knowns, and now we just know them a little more.

But money isn’t always power. The protesters in Cairo and Madison have taught us this—reminded us of this. They can’t buy a muzzle big enough to silence us all. Share the news. Do not retreat; ReTweet.

The revolution keeps spinning. Try not to get too dizzy.

Scotty, hope you like your new cell mate, BUBBA.

     Scott Walker's Billionaire Benefactors who are running commercials attacking Union members for not paying their fair share of taxes using front groups(Wisconsins Club for Growth and Americans for Prosperity) AREN'T PAYING THEIR CORPORATE INCOME TAXES EVEN THOUGH THEY EARNED $100 BILLION LAST YEAR, and TOOK $11 BILLION OUT OF WISCONSIN LAST YEAR FROM GEORGIA PACIFIC'S OPERATIONS!

http://www.gp.com/greenbay/facts.html

 

Georgia Pacific's Green Bay fact sheet claims to employ approx. 2,400 workers.

 

Purchases about $440 million

Pays about $2.5 million in property taxes (it doesn't say anything about state income taxes - I wonder why)

Pays approximately $170 million in annual payroll, gross wages and taxes

 

(But they pulled $11 Billion out of the state in PROFITS for the Koch Brothers last year.)

 

Do the math.  For what this business does for the state and its employees, Georgia Pacific sucks this state DRY for ENORMOUS PROFITS.

 

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/koch-industries-lawyer-white-house-how-did-you-get-our-tax-information-1

 

In August, 2010 a senior Obama administration official told reporters in an on the record background briefing on corporate taxes

 

"So in this country we have partnerships, we have S corps, we have LLCs, we have a series of entities that do not pay corporate income tax.  Some of which are really giant firms, you know Koch Industries is a multibillion dollar business.  So that creates  narrower base because we've literally got something like 50% of the business income in the U.S. is going to businesses that don't pay any corporate income tax."

 

According to Koch Industries, they claim that administration officials "may" have crossed the line by revealing tax information about Koch Industries.

 

Except that tax information is readily available to researchers.  You can get it from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue or the IRS, and it gets published in articles like those from the Institute for Wisconsins' Future.  It is in the public domain, you just have to look for it.  Unless, of course, Koch Industries has hidden it so well, that they didn't expect anyone to be able to find it!

 

But that distracts from the real issue here. According to Koch officials, they claim that the Obama Administration revealed tax information about Koch Industries, which means that what he said WAS ACCURATE!  WHICH WOULD ALSO MEAN THAT KOCH INDUSTRIES DIDN'T PAY ANY CORPORATE INCOME TAXES, EVEN THOUGH THEY EARN OVER $100 BILLION A YEAR.

 

So, Walker's great billionaire benefactor is telling Walker to force the unions to "pay their fair share", and trying to break the unions, even though he, himself, through his own corporation ISN'T PAYING ANY CORPORATE INCOME TAXES ON $100 BILLION OF INCOME!!!!!

 

At the top 35% tax rate that would be $35 BILLION in Federal Taxes ALONE!  And what does that mean for STATE TAXES?   Even at a 6% rate, that would be $6 Billion, OR TWICE THE STATE DEBT!!!

 

So, tell me again Scotty, what is so fair about your proposal to "balance the budget" on the backs of working people, while breaking unions, and still not collecting taxes from multi-BILLIONAIRES???

   Fighting America's Overthrow by Fascist Koch Klones


The newly elected Governor of Wisconsin is a shill for billionaire Koch Brothers in their bid to destroy the Middle Class in America.  Their father created and funded the extreme right-wing John Birch Society, and his 2 racist Corporate Fascist sons believe their time has come to overthrow America.  Thru fake grassroots organizations with appealing sounding but false names like Americans for Prosperity, and with their closest Judicial Activist buddies sitting on the US Supreme Court - opening the door for endless Corporate funding of elections in America, - the Nov 2nd Elections saw massive gains for right-wing extremist Candidates when Koch millions suddenly swept America like wildfire, roasting a Democratic Party caught asleep at the wheel.


In North Carolina, both Houses of the Legislature fell under control of Rethuglicans for the first time in over a century with financial help from AfP.  The Majority Leader in the NC Senate is an unconvicted tea party Felon, as is his DA son.  Koch money was funneled into NC thru  Americans for Prosperity  to finance formation of several dozen astroturf Teabagger groups, who overwhelmed an incompetent State Democratic Party's inept leadership. 


Kochs and their subversive organizations had succeeded in 2009 NC Municipal Elections by taking control of the Capital City's Wake County School Board, as their first test case to accomplish their father's Birch Society dream of re-segregating America's Public Schools.  The Wake County Democratic Party - severely weakened by years of attacks from an external Progressive Corporation on the Left - totally failed to recognize the attack coming at them from Koch Corporate Fascists on the Far Right. 


More on NC & national Koch Klone corruption is found here: http://earthhome.us by scrolling down each of 10 pages accessed by Navigation Buttons across the top of every page, with additional documentation found under CorporateFascism & Sociopaths Buttons.

 
Make no mistake about it:  the 2nd American Revolution is underway.  And it wasn't just NC "leadership" that was incompetent, Democrats across the country were over-confident and caught flat-footed and totally unaware, in spite of the fact that they had been given repeated warnings that their efforts were ineffective during the campaigns.  You can't depend on the depend on the Democratic party to do this FOR you.  YOU HAVE TO RISE UP ON A GRASS ROOTS LEVEL TO DEFEND YOURSELVES!  IF YOU DON'T THEY WIN!


This time it's American Democracy vs Corporate Terrorists and their Teabagger toadies.
___________________________________________________


Video> Rachel Maddow Explains Rethuglican War on Government Workers & Unions
The GOP is dead.  The Party of Lincoln is now fully absorbed by a Party of TransNational Corporate Fascists which is being operated of, by and for the richest 1% who are sponging up trillions from American taxpayers.  Military funding escalates by creating more endless wars, because the War Department at the Pentagon has created a straight-line siphon from Middle Class pockets directly to Military-Industrial Contractors.  The accelerating Corporate Fascist Master Plan is to bankrupt America, both morally and financially. 

     A durable social safety net established 8 decades ago for us ordinary Americans is being ripped to shreds to pay for it.

     Tea partiers have become patsies for billionaires who feed their anger by financing their twisted fantasies.


WI Governor Scott Walker Runs on Koch Money
Lisa Graves, PR Watch: "A new investigation by the Center for Media and Democracy documents the big money funneled by one of the richest men in America and one of the richest corporations in the world to put controversial Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in office. Walker was elected just over three months ago on the heels of an exceptionally expensive gubernatorial race in the Badger State, fueled by groups funded by the Koch brothers, David and Charles. David Koch, the son of a radical founding member of the John Birch Society, which has long been obsessed with claims about socialism and advocated the repeal of civil rights laws, personally donated $1 million to the Republican Governors Association (RGA) in June of last year. The RGA in turn spent $5 million in the race, mostly on TV ads attacking Walker's political opponent, Democratic Mayor Tom Barrett."
Read the Article

     Remember how Republicans attacked Mayor Barrett and Governor Doyle for "raising taxes"?  They didn't SAY WHOSE taxes were being raised, because then they would have shown their real motivations.  The taxes were raised on big corporations by only a few percent, and most of those corporations 2/3rds of them in Wisconsin AND in the country, pay NO income taxes AT ALL.  And Doyle raised taxes on people making $300,000 or more, by only 1%.  THAT's what they were complaining about.  So much for their demands for "Shared Sacrifices".  Those tax increases on the rich protected average workers, but average workers were conned into voting for the very people who would reverse that and put even MORE pressure on average workers, while giving more HANDOUTS to rich Republicans!!!  

     

   Republicans want you to believe that "greedy" workers and Unions have caused this economic downturn and job losses "because they demand too much money and benefits".  REALLY?  Let's look at the FACTS.

Let's look at what the value of an average working man's annual wages in 1900 ($438) would be worth in 2009

 

This PROVES that Labor and Union demands aren't the cause of companies or countries having economic problems.  It shows that for more than 80% of all laborers in the United States have had STAGNANT wages not just for the last 30 years as the graphs show, but go way beyond that for 111 YEARS.

 

http://www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/  This link allows you to compute the value of pay based on the year it was earned.  If you input the average pay for a worker in 1900, 111 years ago, which was $438 per year and input that number and year, and the get a calculation on what it is worth based on 2009 dollars, for equivalent buying power for the type of labor, which that wage would have bought in 1900:

 

 

 

 

It will show that according to the unskilled wage computation, an unskilled worker would be paid $53,600.00 JUST TO STAY EVEN with the value of $438 of wages in 1900.

 

It also shows that that same $438 would be worth $83,600.00 using the Production Worker Compensation calculator.  So you would need to make that much just to stay EVEN with 1900 wages if you are a Production Worker.

 

And if you were a professional person, you would be making between $80,000.00 and $200,000.00 (this calculation was from a different source but is similar to what is calculated in this link when calculating the nominal GDP per Capita of $74,400.00 to $301,000.00 as a relative share of GDP.  So, why hasn't worker pay kept up to these basic calculations? 

 

But you aren’t staying even, YOU’RE ACTUALLY GOING BACKWARDS.

 

Because the RICH are taking YOUR SHARES OF ANY INCREASES, WHILE YOU GET NOTHING.

 

In 2010:

Average HOUSEHOLD INCOME (INCLUDING THE RICH) $49,777

Average PER CAPITA Income (including the rich) $33,070.30

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_gro_nat_inc_percap-gross-national-income-per-capita

 

How can that be?  The Average Per Capita Income and the Average Household Income INCLUDING the RICH are way BELOW what an UNSKILLED worker would be paid, JUST TO STAY EVEN with the buying power of the 1900's.  We all know that the filthy rich DRIVE UP the averages of ALL income, so if you were just staying EVEN, the average Per Capita income and the Average Household Income should be WAAAY more than shown, as much as seven TIMES as what it actually is.  But it isn't, which just demonstrates that LABOR pay has been kept artificially LOW for 111 years. 

 

But it also demonstrates that because this is only based on REPORTED INCOME, that the RICH have NOT been accurately REPORTING THEIR INCOME!

 

If they HAD, the average incomes would be much, much higher!  So, the $12-20 TRILLION dollars that REPUBLICANS HAVE ADMITTED have been illegally stashed in overseas accounts in hundreds of banks in 70 countries to evade taxes, which have not been included in those calculations, ALSO PROVES IT.

 

 

http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=1719043850682&set=p.1719043850682&theater

 

 

  And this chart only shows from 1979 to 2007!!!

 

This shows a graph on the difference between worker income "increases which don't increase at all” in comparison to the top 1% and top 20% of income. The top 1% zooms to the top, the top 20% goes up slightly, and the lower 80% are STAGNANT from 1979 to 2007.

 

80% of all the income increases in the last year 2010, went to the top 1% RICHEST PEOPLE in AMERICA.

 

So, tell me again, how it is the worker's fault for getting too much compensation for their labors, for driving business expenses, when they haven’t seen real increases in 111 years?

 

 

http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/his/e_prices1.htm

Facts & Figures:
Income and Prices 1900

 

1900

Occupation

Income

Average of all Industries

$ 438/year

State and Local Government Workers

$ 590/year

Public School Teacher

$ 328/year

Building Trades

37 ¢/hour
Working week: 48.3 h.

Medical/Health Services Worker

$ 256/year

 

Product

Price

Butter (Pound)

$ .26

Eggs (Dozen)

$ .23

Rice (Pound)

$ .07

Washing Machine (non-electrical)

$ 4,75

Bicycle

$ 16,75

 

If you look at the AVERAGE income for workers in all industries and only increased that every year with a cost of living increase of 3.5% or 4% each year (which means that you are only indexing for inflation and NOT actually giving any pay increases above that), and calculate that out to 2010 to see what that $438 average yearly income would be worth, you find that that average worker's annual income would only be worth $19,271.37 to $32,744.73.  Actual average per capita income is only $33,070.30.   The number makes it appear as if it is almost the exact same as if there was a 4% annual cost of living every year from 1900 to 2010.

 

If that were true, then there has been NO increase in wages for average workers in over 110 years!  But it is actually much worse, because that average includes not just workers, but also the richest in the country, so the income for average workers is actually much, much less.  Top CEOs have seen 4500% increases in compensation in just the last 30 years alone.  Banks and Oil Companies have seen record profits, but there has been no significant increase in hiring, even as corporate executives are seeing record increases in compensation, doubling and tripling their pay, even as they are laying off thousands of workers, and buying up and merging with other companies.

The top 5% richest in America have had their incomes jump at the same time as average workers have remained stagnant.  In 2010, 80% of all income increases went to the top 1% richest in America.  During the eight years of the Bush Administration, the top 200 RICHEST Americans increased their worth by $680 BILLION dollars.  How much of that went into job creation?  Well, in order to keep up with population growth, you have to see 150,000 jobs created every month.  That works out to 1.8 Million per year or 14.4 Million jobs over 8 years.  Bush's Administration reported only 3.5 million jobs created over eight years.  President Carter's Administration created 10.4 Million jobs in 4 years.  That job creation rate (2.6 million per year) was second only to President Clinton's job creation rate of 2.9 Million per year, or 23.2 Million over eight years.  And guess what?  HE RAISED TAXES ON THE RICH!

Right now the Wisconsin Club For Growth (which should be called the Wisconsin Club for Depression), is running ads attacking Public Workers who belong to Unions, claiming that because people in the private sector have taken pay and benefit cuts in order to keep their jobs (many who DON'T belong to Unions), that Union represented members should do so as well.   The message as that Union members should pay their fair share, but why is it that an organization supposedly trying to improve things is actually demanding that all workers take pay cuts?  That doesn't even make sense.  Shouldn't they be fighting for better wages for all workers?  And why is it that they are demanding that workers take paycuts when they don't ask the richest of the rich to do the same?  Why is it that they continue to demand more and more tax cuts for the richest Americans, many of whom have accumulated tens of TRILLIONS of dolllars in secret illegal bank accounts overseas to evade taxes.  And now Republicans are pushing for additional tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires to "repatriate" money held overseas so they only have to pay a 5.4% tax rate down from the maximum tax rate of 35%!!!  And THAT in spite of the fact that 2/3rds of All corporations in the U.S. pay NOTHING in income taxes at all, and most of them are the biggest, richest corporations IN THE WORLD.  Exxon Mobil paid NOTHING in income taxes to the U.S. for the previous tax season, but due to tax loopholes created by Republicans, they get $46 MILLION back from the U.S. Government for taxes paid to a foreign country!!!  Exxon Mobil IS the richest corporation in the world, by the way.  And they wonder why we're broke???

           

 

 

3.50%

4.00%

 

3.50%

4.00%

  1900

438

438

1900

590

590

1901

453.33

455.52

1901

610.65

613.6

1902

469.1966

473.7408

1902

632.0228

638.144

1903

485.6184

492.6904

1903

654.1435

663.6698

1904

502.6151

512.398

1904

677.0386

690.2166

1905

520.2066

532.894

1905

700.7349

717.8252

1906

538.4138

554.2097

1906

725.2606

746.5382

1907

557.2583

576.3781

1907

750.6448

776.3997

1908

576.7624

599.4332

1908

776.9173

807.4557

1909

596.949

623.4106

1909

804.1094

839.754

1910

617.8423

648.347

1910

832.2533

873.3441

1911

639.4667

674.2809

1911

861.3821

908.2779

1912

661.8481

701.2521

1912

891.5305

944.609

1913

685.0128

729.3022

1913

922.7341

982.3934

1914

708.9882

758.4743

1914

955.0298

1021.689

1915

733.8028

788.8133

1915

988.4558

1062.557

1916

759.4859

820.3658

1916

1023.052

1105.059

1917

786.0679

853.1804

1917

1058.859

1149.261

1918

813.5803

887.3076

1918

1095.919

1195.232

1919

842.0556

922.7999

1919

1134.276

1243.041

1920

871.5275

959.7119

1920

1173.975

1292.763

1921

902.031

998.1004

1921

1215.065

1344.473

1922

933.6021

1038.024

1922

1257.592

1398.252

1923

966.2781

1079.545

1923

1301.608

1454.182

1924

1000.098

1122.727

1924

1347.164

1512.349

1925

1035.101

1167.636

1925

1394.315

1572.843

1926

1071.33

1214.342

1926

1443.116

1635.757

1927

1108.826

1262.915

1927

1493.625

1701.187

1928

1147.635

1313.432

1928

1545.901

1769.235

1929

1187.803

1365.969

1929

1600.008

1840.004

1930

1229.376

1420.608

1930

1656.008

1913.605

1931

1272.404

1477.432

1931

1713.969

1990.149

1932

1316.938

1536.53

1932

1773.957

2069.755

1933

1363.031

1597.991

1933

1836.046

2152.545

1934

1410.737

1661.911

1934

1900.308

2238.647

1935

1460.113

1728.387

1935

1966.818

2328.193

1936

1511.217

1797.522

1936

2035.657

2421.32

1937

1564.109

1869.423

1937

2106.905

2518.173

1938

1618.853

1944.2

1938

2180.647

2618.9

1939

1675.513

2021.968

1939

2256.969

2723.656

1940

1734.156

2102.847

1940

2335.963

2832.602

1941

1794.851

2186.961

1941

2417.722

2945.906

1942

1857.671

2274.439

1942

2502.342

3063.743

1943

1922.689

2365.417

1943

2589.924

3186.292

1944

1989.984

2460.034

1944

2680.572

3313.744

1945

2059.633

2558.435

1945

2774.392

3446.294

1946

2131.72

2660.772

1946

2871.495

3584.145

1947

2206.33

2767.203

1947

2971.998

3727.511

1948

2283.552

2877.891

1948

3076.017

3876.612

1949

2363.476

2993.007

1949

3183.678

4031.676

1950

2446.198

3112.727

1950

3295.107

4192.943

1951

2531.815

3237.236

1951

3410.436

4360.661

1952

2620.428

3366.726

1952

3529.801

4535.087

1953

2712.143

3501.395

1953

3653.344

4716.491

1954

2807.068

3641.451

1954

3781.211

4905.15

1955

2905.316

3787.109

1955

3913.553

5101.356

1956

3007.002

3938.593

1956

4050.528

5305.411

1957

3112.247

4096.137

1957

4192.296

5517.627

1958

3221.176

4259.982

1958

4339.026

5738.332

1959

3333.917

4430.382

1959

4490.892

5967.866

1960

3450.604

4607.597

1960

4648.074

6206.58

1961

3571.375

4791.901

1961

4810.756

6454.843

1962

3696.373

4983.577

1962

4979.133

6713.037

1963

3825.746

5182.92

1963

5153.402

6981.559

1964

3959.647

5390.237

1964

5333.771

7260.821

1965

4098.235

5605.846

1965

5520.453

7551.254

1966

4241.673

5830.08

1966

5713.669

7853.304

1967

4390.132

6063.283

1967

5913.648

8167.436

1968

4543.786

6305.814

1968

6120.625

8494.134

1969

4702.819

6558.047

1969

6334.847

8833.899

1970

4867.417

6820.369

1970

6556.567

9187.255

1971

5037.777

7093.184

1971

6786.047

9554.745

1972

5214.099

7376.911

1972

7023.558

9936.935

1973

5396.593

7671.987

1973

7269.383

10334.41

1974

5585.473

7978.867

1974

7523.811

10747.79

1975

5780.965

8298.022

1975

7787.145

11177.7

1976

5983.299

8629.942

1976

8059.695

11624.81

1977

6192.714

8975.14

1977

8341.784

12089.8

1978

6409.459

9334.146

1978

8633.747

12573.39

1979

6633.79

9707.512

1979

8935.928

13076.33

1980

6865.973

10095.81

1980

9248.685

13599.38

1981

7106.282

10499.64

1981

9572.389

14143.36

1982

7355.002

10919.63

1982

9907.423

14709.09

1983

7612.427

11356.42

1983

10254.18

15297.45

1984

7878.862

11810.67

1984

10613.08

15909.35

1985

8154.622

12283.1

1985

10984.54

16545.73

1986

8440.034

12774.42

1986

11369

17207.56

1987

8735.435

13285.4

1987

11766.91

17895.86

1988

9041.175

13816.82

1988

12178.75

18611.69

1989

9357.616

14369.49

1989

12605.01

19356.16

1990

9685.133

14944.27

1990

13046.18

20130.41

1991

10024.11

15542.04

1991

13502.8

20935.62

1992

10374.96

16163.72

1992

13975.4

21773.05

1993

10738.08

16810.27

1993

14464.54

22643.97

1994

11113.91

17482.68

1994

14970.8

23549.73

1995

11502.9

18181.99

1995

15494.77

24491.72

1996

11905.5

18909.27

1996

16037.09

25471.39

1997

12322.19

19665.64

1997

16598.39

26490.24

1998

12753.47

20452.26

1998

17179.33

27549.85

1999

13199.84

21270.35

1999

17780.61

28651.85

2000

13661.84

22121.17

2000

18402.93

29797.92

2001

14140

23006.01

2001

19047.03

30989.84

2002

14634.9

23926.25

2002

19713.68

32229.43

2003

15147.12

24883.3

2003

20403.66

33518.61

2004

15677.27

25878.64

2004

21117.79

34859.35

2005

16225.98

26913.78

2005

21856.91

36253.73

2006

16793.89

27990.33

2006

22621.9

37703.87

2007

17381.67

29109.95

2007

23413.67

39212.03

2008

17990.03

30274.34

2008

24233.15

40780.51

2009

18619.68

31485.32

2009

25081.31

42411.73

2010

19271.37

32744.73

2010

25959.15

44108.2

     2010
Average HOUSEHOLD INCOME (INCLUDING THE RICH) $49,777

Average PER CAPITA Income (including the rich) $33,070.30

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_gro_nat_inc_percap-gross-national-income-per-capita

 

    Want to know how to recall Governor Walker and Republican State Senators and Assembly Reps who support Walker's Union Busting "Budget Balancing" Scam?

    The information is all here:

      http://elections.state.wi.us/docview.asp?docid=11827&locid=47

     Important points to consider. 

     You have to get the required number of signatures within 60 days of registering your recall petition, so ORGANIZE and sign up people who will sign the recall petition, BEFORE you register, so you know exactly who to go to to get the signatures. 

     You need to get 25% of the total number of votes cast for the Governor's race to meet the minimum requirement.  That is going to be a LOW number because there was LOW turnout for the election!

     You cannot recall anyone who has not yet served for at least one year, so we have to wait for almost a year to recall Walker...but...we can recall any Republican State Senators and State Assembly Reps who have voted for Walker's Bill and have served for more than one year!

     Start with those officials who are in districts with low turnout and as close to 50/50 voter party preference distribution as possible.  They are the most vulnerable, particularly if they are in stronger Union worker areas.

     Start organizing NOW, because we can't wait for the next election.  It will be too late then!

     Thanks Gwen!!

We can break the Republican majority in the legislature by recalling three of these people. At the very least we can put pressure on them!

Here are the Republican legislators eligible for recall. We need signatures from these districts:

District 2 - Robert Cowles (Green Bay) - needs 15,127 signatures
8 - Alberta Darling (River Hills) - needs 24,811 signatures   She won a VERY CLOSE race with Sheldon Wasserman during the last elections in 2010.
10 - Sheila Harsdorf (River Hills) - needs 24,595 signatures
14 - Luther Olsen (Ripon) - needs 13,535 signatures
18 - Randy Hopper (Fond du Lac) - needs 20,912 signatures
20 - Glenn Grothman (West Bend) - needs 21,764 signatures
28 - Mary Lazich (New Berlin) - needs 18,738 signatures
32 - Dan Kapanke (La Crosse) - needs 22,026 signatures
 
And we can start recall actions against Assembly Representatives who have been in office for more than one year as well!
 
Jim Ott is one! 

 

     Rev. Welton Gaddy on Gabby Giffords:

"Given what she has been through, if she can open her eyes, maybe we can, too."

    Let's not just pray for this folks.  It's time for us to walk the talk AND hold people accountable for fear-mongering and manipulating the public for their votes.

    Sunday January 9, 2011

      In the Wake of the Assassination Attempt of Congresswoman Gabriella Giffords ( D - AZ )

      In the wake of the tragedy in Tucson, Congress is asking itself whether or not (and how) they should improve security for members of Congress.  This, in spite of the fact that they don’t have the MONEY to provide the level of security to provide that level of security for all 535 members of Congress, and there isn’t a proper coordination between Congressional offices and local, state and federal law enforcement agencies to offer it in the first place.

 

      But the worst part about it is that they are ASKING THE WRONG QUESTION.  Rather than hiding behind even more layers of security to insulate themselves from the public and the real people on the street, whom they are supposed to be serving, they should be talking about IMPROVING the TONE of communication and changing the form of rhetoric that is being used by Politicians and the Media to inflame tempers and incite acts of violence while LYING to the public in order to get elected and directing unwarranted anger against other people for unjustified “reasons”.

 

      They should be upholding standards of civil discourse far more stringent than anyone else in our society, and modeling that behavior for others to emulate.  If they cannot or will not, then they should not be provided free access to our airwaves to perpetuate or incite hate or violence.  (There are requirements for members of Congress and our State Legislature regarding how they can address one another when debating issues, much like those in Roberts Rules of Parliamentary Procedure, on the floor of the House and Senate, although they have not always been followed in recent years.  Those requirements should extend to statements which elected officials make to their constituents in public or private venues as well.)

 

      In addition, the Fairness Doctrine, introduced in 1949 by the FCC, required that statements made by advertisers or politicians through the public airways or other media, inform people representing opposing views of such airings and provide them an opportunity to provide the public with alternate viewpoint.  It was a Doctrine adopted by the FCC, but not actually a law enacted by Congress.  As such, opponents of the Doctrine pressured the FCC to do away with it.  There was an attempt by Congress to pass a bill to make the policy law, but it was vetoed in 1987 by President Reagan. 

 

      Two other corollary rules, the political editorial rule and the personal attack rule, were added in 1967.  The policial editorial rule required that different political editorial comments which disfavored candidates be provided an opportunity to respond within 24 hours.  The personal attack rule requires that the person impugned be contacted within a week and be provided a reasonable opportunity to respond.  

 

     Congress' response to this shooting is that they are primarily thinking about protecting the members of their own club, rather than recognizing that the vitriol in the media and by politicians and their surrogates are causing acts of violence to erupt not only against members of Congress, but against average people in the public, on a DAILY BASIS.

 

      Remember that of the 20 people who were shot in Tucson, of those killed - one was a Federal Judge who was not scheduled to be there, but only stopped by to say hello; one was a Congressional staffer, and the other four were members of the audience, one a nine year old girl who was invited to meet the Congresswoman because she had just been elected to the Student Council.  In addition, of the 14 wounded, one was Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and 11 were members of the public (two others were members of her staff)..  Not only are members of Congress at risk because of the vitriol and spurious comments which incite violence against people who disagree with them, but people in the general public as well.  They pay a price with their lives and current and future health, and don’t get the attention or acknowledgement that the more famous or “newsworthy” are given.  They get lost in the shuffle, and are forgotten long before the tragedies cease to be of importance to those who manipulate them for their own purposes.

 

      The irresponsible use of our public airways by elected members of our Government, or by their surrogates, or paid media shills, who are paid to shift public opinion according to moneyed interests regardless of the effect on our culture and our economy, intended or not, needs to be very carefully scrutinized and regulated.  And those who abuse their public access should be held fully accountable for their actions and the actions which they incite.

 

      The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees free speech and freedom of the press without abridging free speech, or the press, by the government.  Hate speech is NOT a guaranteed freedom.  In 1993, the Supreme Court decision on Wisconsin v Mitchell  declared that state legislation permitting tougher sentencing for offense motivated by racial or religious hatred are constitutional.

 

      While many in Political positions and in the media are asking for prayers on behalf of the victims and their families, and I would also, if you are so inclined; we all need to be looking at and working toward creating an environment in our culture where FREEDOM is more than just a tag line or brand manipulated to make those who use the word appear to be more patriotic than anyone else.  Freedom requires that we all exercise tolerance for differing opinions and practices as long as they don’t harm others.  It ISN’T about allowing people to do whatever they want, hurting anyone they want, without any repercussions for those actions.

 

    WMC found themselves in a pickle when they supported Scott Walker, and Ron Johnson, even though they also quietly supported the High Speed Rail project.  They wanted and needed, not only the money, but recognized that High Speed Rail would improve their business environment (regardless of where it was located), and the economy in general, but they also wanted the elimination of Corporate Income Taxes which Walker and all of the incoming Republicans supported.  (Wisconsin's general revenues are currently made up of only about 7% from Corporate Income Taxes, and 2/3rds of all Corporations in the State ALREADY don't pay any income taxes.  Where do YOU think he's going to make up that difference?)  So, when Walker rejected the $810 million for the High Speed Rail, which he always wanted to SPEND, but only wanted to control WHERE the money would go (to his campaign donors), they lost a huge chunk of future income.  By eliminating this source of income in the STATE, ALL of their businesses will also suffer from lost revenues.

    Now WMC can get their elimination of Corporate Income Taxes, but they've eliminated a huge source of funding which would have improved the economic environment for everyone in Wisconsin.  And because the loss of Corporate Tax Revenues from the income side of the budget means a bigger State debt and deficit, the State will have less money available to help Counties and Municipalities, and they will also either have to slash public services (which have already been slashed to the bone), or have to raise taxes on the only other group still paying the majority of taxes in the state - the PROPERTY TAXPAYERS.  So, how well do you think businesses will fare if they can't keep employees in the State, because THEIR taxes keep going up, while their public services and education support are slashed to the bone?

    Walker has already demonstrated his failure to lead responsibly by failing to take a long term view and planning for the future.  His short term view and political idiology have handicapped not only himself, but the entire State.  And WMC's GREED will end up hurting their member organizations as well.   

     You can help  that along by BOYCOTTING WMC Board Members BUSINESSES!

     

WMC Board of Directors  Pro-Walker, Pro-Johnson, ANTI-LABOR

 

 

http://wmc.org/AboutWMC/catpage.cfm?category=8

 

WMC Current Directors | WMC Officers | Past Chairs | Service Corporation Board | WMC Foundation Board

Daniel T. Ariens, President & CEO
Ariens Company, Brillion

Sidney H. Bliss, President & CEO
Bliss Communications, Janesville

David H. Bretting, President & CEO
C. G. Bretting Manufacturing Co., Inc., Ashland

Leo P. Brideau, President & CEO
Columbia St. Mary’s Inc., Milwaukee

Mark D. Bugher, Director
University Research Park, Inc., Madison

Thomas A. Burke, President & CEO
Modine Manufacturing Company, Racine

William J. Butsic, Plant Manager
ConAgra Foods, Menomonie

John Casper, President & CEO
Oshkosh Chamber of Commerce, Oshkosh

Timothy L. Christen, Chairman & CEO
Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, Madison

James D. Friedman, Senior Partner
Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee

Mark F. Furlong, Chairman, President & CEO
Marshall & Ilsley Corporation, Milwaukee

Reed E. Hall, Executive Director (Retired)
Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield

James S. Haney, President & CEO
Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, Madison

Curtis L. Hoppestad, Global Director, Riding Lawn Equipment
John Deere Horicon Works, Horicon

Thomas J. Howatt, President & CEO
Wausau Paper Corp., Mosinee

Robert D. Kamphuis, Chairman of the Board, President & CEO
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc., Mayville

Michael Kogelis, Community Banking President
Wells Fargo Bank Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Laura E. Kohler, Sr. Vice President/HR
Kohler Company, Kohler

Tod B. Linstroth, Sr. Partner & Past Chair and Member of Management Committee
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Madison

Pete McPartland, President & COO
Sentry Insurance, Stevens Point

John A. Mellowes, Chairman & CEO
Charter Manufacturing Company, Inc., Mequon

J. R. Menard, Executive Vice President & Treasurer
Menard, Inc., Eau Claire

Van W. Nutt, Executive Director
Middleton Chamber of Commerce, Middleton

Paul Palmby, Executive Vice President & COO
Seneca Foods Corporation, Janesville

William C. Parsons, President
Palmer Johnson Enterprises, Inc., Sturgeon Bay

Nicholas T. Pinchuk, Chairman, President & CEO
Snap-on Incorporated, Kenosha

Diane S. Postler-Slattery, Ph.D., President & COO; SVP of Quality and Extended Services
Aspirus Wausau Hospital, Wausau

Joseph T. Pregont, President & CEO
Prent Corporation, Janesville

Joel Quadracci, Chairman, President & CEO
Quad/Graphics, Sussex

Larry Rambo, Senior Executive for Strategic Partnerships
Humana, Inc., Waukesha

Jerry G. Ryder, President
InSinkErator Division, Emerson Electric Co., Racine

Michael W. Salsieder, President & General Counsel
Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Company, Inc., Wausau

Edward H. Schaefer, CEO
Citizens Community Federal, Eau Claire

Karl A. Schmidt, President & CEO
Belmark Inc., DePere

Charles A. Schrock, Chairman, President & CEO
Integrys Energy Group, Green Bay

Rajan Sheth, Chairman, President & CEO
Mead & Hunt, Inc., Madison

Jay L. Smith, Chairman & CEO
Teel Plastics, Inc., Baraboo

Michael L. Swenson, President & CEO
Northern States Power Company - Wisconsin
An Xcel Energy Company
, Eau Claire

Glen E. Tellock, Chairman, President & CEO
The Manitowoc Company, Inc., Manitowoc

Todd J. Teske, Chairman, President & CEO
Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Wauwatosa

Jeff Thompson, M.D., CEO
Gundersen Lutheran Health System, La Crosse

John B. Torinus Jr., Chairman
Serigraph Inc., West Bend

Todd Wanek, President & CEO
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., Arcadia

Kelly L. Wolff, Vice President Manufacturing,
Green Bay Operations
Georgia-Pacific, Green Bay

David Yanda, President & CEO
Lakeside Foods, Inc., Manitowoc

 

     Earlier in August of this year (2010), the U.S. Navy postponed the announcement of contract awards for Littoral Combat Ships to Marinette Marine http://www.jsonline.com/business/101317559.html , a few days after the announcement was made that Marinette Marine had been awarded a contract for $73.6 Million through NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), http://www.jsonline.com/newswatch/91624234.html  announced by Congressman Steve Kagen (D) who recently was NOT re-elected by his constituents despite his efforts.  Congressman Bart Stupak (D) Michigan, and Congressman Kagen had announced a $1.09 Billion contract award in 2009 for two ships.

     Governor Doyle (D) announced on November 4, that the U.S. Navy awarded a 10 ship contract to Marinette Marine for 10 ships, and 2,000 jobs plus an additional 1,000 jobs.  (In other reports, the 10 ship contract was reported to be worth $300 million per ship, or roughly $3 Billion.)  Senator Carl Levin (D)- Michigan, is currently Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which has something to do with the state getting the contract.  (People up there should consider that before turning the Senate over to the Republican Party, given that they've already ousted Senator Feingold.)

    http://www.wisgov.state.wi.us/journal_media_detail.asp?locid=19&prid=5474

     Senator Kohl later announced that not only would the contract create 1,000 jobs, but as many as 5,000 direct and indirect jobs.  http://www.wfrv.com/news/local/Contract-could-creat-1000-new-jobs-106691338.html

     The next day, it was announced that the contract would be awarded pending Congressional approval.  http://www.wbay.com/Global/story.asp?S=13454516 , and that it was worth $5 Billion.

     Now, (November 6, 2010), Jeff Sessions ( R ) Senior member of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, says that the Navy "would like to" purchase 10 of the ships now worth $4.8 Billion and 6,500 direct and indirect jobs in Wisconsin and Michigan.  Maybe the cost of the ships have gone up from $3 billion to $5 billion just because Republicans took control of the House.  (So much for holding costs and spending down.)  One has to wonder why the number of jobs is being "boosted" because Republicans have now taken control of both Houses of the State Legislature, the majority of the seats for Congress, the Senate seat currently held by Russ Feingold and the Governor's office currently held by Governor Jim Doyle (D). 

     http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20101106/ADV01/11060472/Marinette-Marine-may-get-LCS-contract

     One also has to wonder if those jobs might be in jeopardy if Republicans would prefer to have that business go to a more prominant "Red State".  But you might want to remember who fought to bring those jobs to Wisconsin in the first place.

      Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce are once again behind attacks on Democratic incumbents, claiming that they've raised taxes on workers.  That, in spite of the fact that taxes in Wisconsin have gone down for each of the last 6 years under Democratic majorities in the State Legislature, and having a Democratic Governor. 

Latest Wisconsin Department of Revenue Reports Show Wisconsin State and Local Tax Rankings LOWEST since 1961-1962!  Dropping for Six Straight Years Under Democratic Control!

 

    Taxes are the lowest they've been in the last 50 years!  And that includes under majority Republican Legislatures and Republican Governors for MOST of that time.  So, why are they complaining?  Because Corporations which are currently only paying a little over 7% of the total tax revenues (with individuals paying almost 93% of the total tax revenues, with 2/3rds of all corporations in the state of Wisconsin paying NOTHING in State Corporate Income Taxes), used to pay only 5% of the total tax revenues under majority Republican rule!  That was because Republicans dropped corporate share of tax revenues from a little over 11% during Tommy Thompson and Scott McCallum's administrations down to 5%.  They cut Corporate tax shares to less than half of what they had previously been paying!  And where did they make up the difference?  They raised YOUR PROPERTY TAXES.  If they get back into the majority, whose taxes do you think they will be cutting? It won't be yours.  And whose taxes to you think they will be raising?  It won't be the corporations or the rich.

 

Reported by The Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, Milwaukee Magazine and The Department of Revenue independently finding the same story:

"Wisconsin’s rankings are their lowest in nearly 50 years and have improved for six consecutive years, unprecedented in state history….In addition, a recently released Ernst and Young study prepared for the Council on State Taxation shows Wisconsin’s business tax ranking now ranks 30th – well below the national average."

 

COST (Council on State Taxation) also reports that state and local business taxes across the country decreased by 3.5% from FY2008 to FY2009.  On average, state and local business taxes across the country only amount to about 9% of all state and local taxes on businesses, while Wisconsin's rate is below the average, and has been on the decline.  (Wisconsin's corporate income tax rates are less than 11 other states, AND 2/3rds of all Wisconsin corporations pay NOTHING in income tax - per Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue records.)

 

And, it should be remembered that because of decades of Wisconsin fiscal policy, which has favored corporations, and cut their taxes, to entice them to locate their businesses here, Property taxes have been the predominant source of Wisconsin's General Revenue.  For State and local Government revenues in Wisconsin, $42.3 per $1,000 personal property value is collected, while corporations pay only $4.6 per $1,000 income.

In other words, individuals pay 9.2 TIMES in personal property tax rates what corporations pay for their income tax rate.  Low tax rates for corporations (which is something that Republicans have always supported), result in HIGHER TAXES for property owners!  Any time corporations get a tax cut, somebody else has to pick up the slack. That means YOU.

 

 

NPR Just Broke An Investigation That they Have Been Working On For MONTHS

 

THE REAL REA$ON BEHIND PRI$ONOMIC$ - REPUBLICAN$ U$E RACI$M TO GET $UPPORT FOR A LAW WHICH WOULD MAKE THEM OB$CENELY RICH!

 

   http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130833741

 

October 28, 2010

Last year, two men showed up in Benson, Ariz., a small desert town 60 miles from the Mexico border, offering a deal.

Glenn Nichols, the Benson city manager, remembers the pitch.

"The gentleman that's the main thrust of this thing has a huge turquoise ring on his finger," Nichols said. "He's a great big huge guy and I equated him to a car salesman."

What he was selling was a prison for women and children who were illegal immigrants.

"They talk [about] how positive this was going to be for the community," Nichols said, "the amount of money that we would realize from each prisoner on a daily rate."

But Nichols wasn't buying. He asked them how would they possibly keep a prison full for years — decades even — with illegal immigrants?

"They talked like they didn't have any doubt they could fill it," Nichols said.

That's because prison companies like this one had a plan — a new business model to lock up illegal immigrants. And the plan became Arizona's immigration law.

Behind-The-Scenes Effort To Draft, Pass The Law

The law is being challenged in the courts. But if it's upheld, it requires police to lock up anyone they stop who cannot show proof they entered the country legally.

When it was passed in April, it ignited a fire storm. Protesters chanted about racial profiling. Businesses threatened to boycott the state.

Supporters were equally passionate, calling it a bold positive step to curb illegal immigration.

But while the debate raged, few people were aware of how the law came about.

NPR spent the past several months analyzing hundreds of pages of campaign finance reports, lobbying documents and corporate records. What they show is a quiet, behind-the-scenes effort to help draft and pass Arizona Senate Bill 1070 by an industry that stands to benefit from it: the private prison industry.

The law could send hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants to prison in a way never done before. And it could mean hundreds of millions of dollars in profits to private prison companies responsible for housing them.

Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce says the bill was his idea. He says it's not about prisons. It's about what's best for the country.

"Enough is enough," Pearce said in his office, sitting under a banner reading "Let Freedom Reign." "People need to focus on the cost of not enforcing our laws and securing our border. It is the Trojan horse destroying our country and a republic cannot survive as a lawless nation."

But instead of taking his idea to the Arizona statehouse floor, Pearce first took it to a hotel conference room.

It was last December at the Grand Hyatt in Washington, D.C. Inside, there was a meeting of a secretive group called the American Legislative Exchange Council. Insiders call it ALEC.

It's a membership organization of state legislators and powerful corporations and associations, such as the tobacco company Reynolds American Inc., ExxonMobil and the National Rifle Association. Another member is the billion-dollar Corrections Corporation of America — the largest private prison company in the country.   more...

 

Taxpayers in Arizona got SUCKERED into getting their TAXES RAISED SKY HIGH.  100,000 inmates at an estimated cost of $50,000.00 per inmate per year = $5,000,000,000.00 PER YEAR.  $5 BILLION PER YEAR.  That is twice Wisconsin's current State Deficit ($2.5 Billion) ALL OF WHICH GOVERNOR Doyle INHERITED from Republican Governors Thompson and McCallum and A Republican Legislature (a minimum of $3.2 Billion up to $5.2 Billion in State Deficits according to various estimates), which Republicans created after the strongest economic DECADE in American HISTORY, and 16 years of Republican control!  And Governor Doyle and a Democratic Legislature REDUCED that deficit by a MINIMUM of $700 Million up to $2.7 Billion, under the worst economic conditions since the Great Depression!  The lowest taxes in 50 years, and reduced every single year out of the last six years!  Better than any Republican Legislature or Republican Governor, over that same 50 years, and Republicans call that a "failed agenda"!?  Remember, Republicans said similar things about President Clinton's administration when he not only BALANCED the FEDERAL BUDGET, but CREATED a SURPLUS.  But they never complained about Bush and a Republican Congress, when they created an $11 TRILLION DEFICIT!  They not only EMBRACED those disastrous policies, they want to go back to them!

 

Think about this!  They want to do this ACROSS THE COUNTRY, and if they get into the majority, THEY WILL.  What does that mean for you?  There are an estimated 12 million undocumented workers in the United States.  12 million x $50,000.00 per year = $600,000,000,000.00  $600 BILLION IN INCREASED TAXES PER YEAR TO KEEP MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN PRISON!  Are they NUTS!? (Actually, they aren't - they're looking for another way to suck every last dime out of you.  They got used to the $10 to $12  BILLION A MONTH they were profiting from the War in Iraq).  They're losing that income stream, (which they also suckered U.S. Taxpayers into buying), and now they're trying to get you to buy ANOTHER PINK ELEPHANT!

 

The Question Is, "Are you foolish enough to fall for it?" Do you REALLY want to give immigrants free room and board and free health care?  Vote for Republicans, and that is EXACTLY what you would be getting, along with THE BILL to PAY FOR IT ALL!

 

 

 

   

    

    STOP THE FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF AMERICA, SIGN THE PETITION NOW!

   http://www.democrats.com/stop-the-foreign-takeover

In January 2010, five Republicans on the Supreme Court gave foreign corporations a Constitutional right to buy Congress and our next President.

If foreign corporations want to buy our elections publicly, they can simply create U.S. subsidiaries. If they want to buy our elections secretly, they can launder their money through the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which aggressively raises foreign money, or through Karl Rove's secretive American Crossroads GPS, both of which are spending millions in this year's elections.

That means foreign leaders like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, Hu Jintao of China, and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia can use their enormous wealth to steal millions of American jobs, keep us dependent on foreign oil and even make us fight their wars.

The Supreme Court put America's national security in danger. They were absolutely wrong and their ruling (Citizens United v. FEC) must be overturned.

Urge your Representatives to co-sponsor the DISCLOSE Act to require full disclosure of all corporate campaign spending and ban foreign corporate spending.

Urge your Representatives to co-sponsor the Shareholder Protection Act to require public shareholder approval of all corporate campaign spending.

And urge your Representatives to co-sponsor a Constitutional Amendment to keep all corporate money out of American politics.

 

Petition

Dear Representative,

In January 2010, five Republicans on the Supreme Court gave foreign corporations a Constitutional right to buy Congress and our next President.

If foreign corporations want to buy our elections publicly, they can simply create U.S. subsidiaries. If they want to buy our elections secretly, they can launder their money through the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which aggressively raises foreign money, or through Karl Rove's secretive American Crossroads GPS, both of which are spending millions in this year's elections.

That means foreign leaders like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, Hu Jintao of China, and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia can use their enormous wealth to steal millions of American jobs, keep us dependent on foreign oil, and even make us fight their wars.

The Supreme Court put America's national security in danger. They were absolutely wrong and their ruling (Citizens United v. FEC) must be overturned.

As my Representative, I urge you to co-sponsor the DISCLOSE Act to require full disclosure of all corporate campaign spending and ban foreign corporate spending.

I also urge you to co-sponsor the Shareholder Protection Act to require public shareholder approval of all corporate campaign spending.

And I urge you to co-sponsor a Constitutional Amendment to keep all corporate money out of American politics.

 

For the Supreme Court of the United States, to claim that foreign corporations have the right to buy air time and put out bogus commercials to manipulate people to vote AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY, and allow these foreign countries to have a DIRECT IMPACT ON OUR ELECTIONS IS BEYOND TREACHERY.  Don't they have any understanding of what a SOVEREIGN NATION IS?  (I know Bush didn't, he said so.  You remember how he answered whether or not he would abide by U.S. agreements with American Indian Tribes, and then was asked if he knew what Sovereign Rights meant.  You remember his incoherent rambling when he couldn't answer the question don't you?)  But to take away the rights of the PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES and GIVE IT AWAY to FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS in a PAY TO PLAY DEAL?  The SCOTUS Justices who supported this decision need to be impeached for high treason.

 

The Saudis already control more than 8% of our national economy, and under Bush, we ran a three-quarters of a TRILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL TRADE DEFICIT with Communist China.

 

They already own our economy, now they want to own US.  Won't You Do Something About It?

 

http://www.democrats.com/stop-the-foreign-takeover

 

   Want to take action?  Here are a few other things you can do.

     Boycott all Republican businesses.  Don't do business with them.  Don't do business with businesses that advertise on right wing programs or on FOX, News Corp. or Clear Channel, or the Sinclair Brothers (Channels 18 and 24 in Milwaukee).  Take your business elsewhere so that they can't use YOUR money AGAINST you.  Some of the biggest Republican supporting businesses are Walmart/Sam's Club, HomeDepot, Target, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Exxon/Moble, BP, (The oil and gas industry has given most of its money to Republicans.  Out of the top 10 Senators receiving money from the oil and gas industries, ONLY ONE was a Democrat - Blanche Lincoln Ark. - no surprise there.  Out of the top ten Congressmen receiving money from the oil and gas industries, three were Democrats, from Oklahoma, Texas and Arkansas), GE (which owns NBC, gave 59% of their donations to Republicans), Disney, AT&T, Glaxo Smith Klein, Amway, to name a few.   The Federal Election Commission keeps track on who is giving to which candidates FEC.gov .  The list of all time biggest donors for both parties from 1989 to 2010 can be found here  http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?order=Afrom .

     While the National Cable MSNBC has more liberal news hosts Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and Ed Schultz (they fired Keith Olbermann because he was one of the most popular liberal hosts and took on the right wing elite and became increasingly under attack by right wingers who wanted him off the air), than most other channels, our local TMJ4 NBC affiliate has been very supportive of right wing policies and heavily promotes their Framed Messages, while downplaying opposing views, and its sister Radio Station WTMJ 620 AM has a hard right selection of radio hosts:  Mark Belling, Charlie Sykes and Jeff Wagner.

     CNN has a long line up of Republican promoting attack dogs in their line up, including Don Lemon and Brooke  Baldwin (who repeatedly badgered and attacked the DPW Communications Director and Wisconsin Democratic State Senators on the Union Busting bill that Governor Walker was  pushing for his billionaire benefactors the Koch Brothers), while repeatedly pushing the lies that Walker was using to promote it.  They along with Candy Crowley in her show following theirs, repeatedly talked about how they "fled the state" or were "hiding out in other states" or "were AWOL" or "refusing to do their job", and how "the voters elected Walker and you lost", completely neglecting the fact that a Legislature is a separate body of elected officials, whose job it is to represent the people who elected them and write legislation, add amendments and debate the issues and merits, rather than just rubber stamping what the Governor demands.  Candy Crowley has consistently misrepresented Democrats during campaigns and gullible viewers have followed here lead. Wolf Blitzer has consistently been a rubber stamp of Republican policies while attacking or putting down Democrats .

     Sign up with petition groups to send messages to your legislators about issues you care about, like Democrats.com , and Progressive Secretary.

   When you consider that Lobbyists make their living off of paying members of Congress to support positions or legislation on their employers' behalf, and that that information is readily available in the public record, you may want to also consider the law and why it is being allowed to be sidestepped and even completely ignored when public policy is being formed by members of Congress.  Then, ask yourselves why?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00000201----000-.html

 

U.S. Code from LII Legal Information Institute from Cornell University Law School search

 

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 11 > § 201

Prev | Next

§ 201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses

How Current is This?

(a) For the purpose of this section—

(1) the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;

(2) the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and

(3) the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.

(b) Whoever—

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

(A) to influence any official act; or

(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;

(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;

(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;

(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom;

shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(c) Whoever—

(1) otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—

(A) directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or

(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

(2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

(d) Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.

(e) The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.

 

   Republicans complain about "high taxes" when they are the ones who CREATE them for the Middle Class, saving the REAL tax cuts for the Corporations and the Super Wealthy

   Consider the words of Warren Buffett, the world's third richest man in 2007, and who is also widely regarded as the world's most successful investor

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/tax/article1996735.ece

   Warren Buffett, the third-richest man in the world, has criticised the US tax system for allowing him to pay a lower rate than his secretary and his cleaner.

Speaking at a $4,600-a-seat fundraiser in New York for Senator Hillary Clinton, Mr Buffett, who is worth an estimated $52 billion (£26 billion), said: “The 400 of us [here] pay a lower part of our income in taxes than our receptionists do, or our cleaning ladies, for that matter. If you’re in the luckiest 1 per cent of humanity, you owe it to the rest of humanity to think about the other 99 per cent.”

 

Mr Buffett said that he was taxed at 17.7 per cent on the $46 million he made last year, without trying to avoid paying higher taxes, while his secretary, who earned $60,000, was taxed at 30 per cent. Mr Buffett told his audience, which included John Mack, the chairman of Morgan Stanley, and Alan Patricof, the founder of the US branch of Apax Partners, that US government policy had accentuated a disparity of wealth that hurt the economy by stifling opportunity and motivation.

 

Mr Buffett, who runs the investment group Berkshire Hathaway and is widely regarded as the world’s most successful investor, said that he was a Democrat because Republicans are more likely to think: “I’m making $80 million a year – God must have intended me to have a lower tax rate.”

 

Mr Buffett said that a Republican proposal to eliminate elements of inheritance tax, which raises about $30 billion a year from the assets of about 12,000 rich families, would broaden the disparity between rich and poor. He added that the Republicans would seek to recover lost revenue by increasing taxes for the less prosperous.

 

He said: “You could take that $30 billion and give $1,000 to 30 million poor families. Or should you favour the 12,000 estates and make 30 million families pay an extra $1,000?” (That is a $2,000 DIFFERENCE for each family by the way, because you go DOWN from $1,000 to zero by losing that $1,000, and go down an ADDITIONAL $1,000 by PAYING the extra $1,000 in taxes! - $1,000     $0      +$1,000  ) 

 

While Warren Buffet didn't come from limited means (his father Howard was a Stock Broker and a U.S. Representative), he started working at his father's firm when he was 11.  And he learned how to invest for the long term.  At the age of 14 he spent $1,200, which he had earned from working two paper routes, and bought 40 acres of land, which he then rented out to tenant farmers.

 

Buffet's approach to investment has been to invest in high-quality businesses with competitive advantages, as opposed to businesses that sell commodities and have many more competitors as a result.

 

He described such advantages as a "moat" that kept rivals at a safe distance, as opposed to commodity businesses, which sell undifferentiated products and face direct competition. A classic example of a wide-moat company is Coca-Cola, because consumers are willing to pay more for a Coke than for a generic beverage with a similar taste. On the other hand, salt is considered a commodity product because consumers generally have no preferences for one brand of salt over another.

Investment in wide-moat businesses has become a hallmark of Berkshire Hathaway, particularly when buying whole companies rather than public stocks. As a result, it now owns a large number of businesses which are dominant players in their respective industries, specialize in various niche markets, or possess other unique characteristics to separate them from their competitors. 
  

   This is why his company consistently out performs his competitors.  He invests in QUALITY, rather than competing with everybody else in a RACE TO THE BOTTOM.

   His approach, the most successful and PROFITABLE investment model IN THE WORLD, is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Republican POLICIES are.

   So, would you rather emulate Warren Buffett's HUGELY SUCCESSFUL DEMOCRATIC policies, or would you prefer to go back to Republican policies which created this mess we're in, in the first place? 

    http://ht.ly/2LmgO

Senate Dems Try To Punish Firms That Export Jobs  (Republicans defeated the bill)

September 28, 2010

UPDATE: 11:52am

by Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tax legislation that would have punished U.S. firms that export jobs has failed in the Senate.

 

The bill failed to reach the 60 votes required to advance in the 100-member chamber. Democrats held the vote Tuesday nonetheless to display their commitment to economic recovery just five weeks before the Nov. 2 elections. Republicans called the vote a political ploy.

 

The bill would have levied tax increases on U.S. companies that close domestic plants and open new ones overseas.

 

The legislation would have also given companies that import jobs to the U.S. new tax breaks.

 

All 435 House seats, 37 in the Senate and the Democratic majority in both houses are on the line Nov. 2.


by Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. companies that close domestic plants and open new ones overseas would see their taxes increase under a bill Democrats are bringing before the Senate Tuesday for one of the last votes before lawmakers head home for the November election.

 

Companies that import jobs to the U.S. would get new tax breaks.

 

Republicans and possibly a few Democrats are expected to block the bill on a procedural vote Tuesday. They say the tax increases would make U.S. companies less competitive.

 

Democrats orchestrated the vote to show sympathy with voters who believe American jobs are being lost because U.S. companies are outsourcing them overseas. With the economy still sluggish and unemployment hovering near 10 percent, Democrats hope to use the issue to score points with voters as they fight to maintain majorities in both the House and Senate.

 

"We're going to take away the incentives corporations have to send our jobs overseas, and give them powerful new incentives to keep American jobs in America," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "Right now our tax code actually rewards corporations for offshoring jobs. It helps them pay the costs of closing their plants and offers them tax breaks if they move production to other countries."

 

The bill would exempt companies that import jobs from paying the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax for new U.S. employees who replace overseas workers who had been doing similar work.

 

The two-year exemption would be available for workers hired over the next three years. The tax cut — estimated to cost about $1 billion — would be partially offset by tax increases on companies that move jobs overseas.

 

The bill would prohibit firms from taking deductions for business expenses associated with expanding operations in other countries. It would increase taxes on U.S. companies that close domestic operations and expand foreign ones to import products to the U.S.

 

"We're just a few weeks away from an election," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. "I wish this election would be a simple referendum on the debate we're having on the floor of the Senate right now."

 

Republicans argue the tax cuts would be difficult to administer and the tax increases would hurt international corporations that employ U.S. workers.

 

"Let's have votes on real job creation incentives and let's get out of this gamesmanship," said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee.

 

The tax increases total $369 million over the next decade, according to a preliminary estimate by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. Combined with the tax cut, the bill would add an estimated $721 million to the budget deficit over the next decade.


 

     Senator Chuck Grassley you may recall, was praised by President Obama for his willingness to work across the aisle in crafting the Healthcare Reform Bill, and had asked for and received a delay on the vote until after the Senate break.  After the break, and the use by Republicans and FOX to incite the Tea Partiers with false information to create hysteria and opposition to the bill among the uninformed, Senator Grassley BRAGGED about how he had conned President Obama into agreeing to the delay which allowed them time to manipulate public opinion.  Gamesmanship, Senator Grassley?  You've taken "Gamesmanship" to a whole new level.  Your version is called FRAUD.    

     Remember how he referred to a provision in the Healthcare Reform Bill, which would provide coverage for "end of life medical consultation", as a plot to "kill Grandma" or "throw Grandma off the train" while speaking to Tea Partiers?  That provision would have provided family members with coverage so that they can get medical consultation to help them make decisions regarding what medical options they have for love ones near the end of their lives.  It was a provision which was included as an amendment from a Republican Representative.  So why were Republicans against it?  Because it was a provision which was most likely TO BE USED BY EVERYONE, and thereby would cost more than other provisions which may only be use by a few out of tens of thousands.  THEY DIDN'T WANT TO SPEND THE MONEY, or rather THE INSURANCE COMPANIES DIDN'T WANT TO SPEND THE MONEY, so they attacked it with fraudulent depictions of what it was.  In the end, it was removed, even though it would have been one of the fairest provisions, since it would have been available to and used by almost everyone; because members of Congress didn't want to deal with anger from constituents who didn't really understand what was going on, but who could still vote them out of office if they supported it!  

"The U.S. Supreme Court soon will hear arguments regarding the alleged vagueness and unnecessary scope of what is known in federal law as ‘honest services fraud.' The FBI and federal prosecutors need the letter and spirit of this violation left intact. Honest services is described in federal law in three lines, contrasted with state ethics laws which are lengthy and essentially of no use in fighting public corruption. More people are sent to prison each year for honest services fraud than ethical violations, bribery, and extortion combined. The reason is that honest services fraud speaks in common sense terms with the clarity of an ethical admonishment from one's grandparents: citizens have a right to have fair and honest representation by the public servants they elect.

 

This core value marks the wrongness - certainly the illegality – of bribes, self-dealing, cronyism, nepotism, patronage, Hobbs Act, and violations of all other state and federal anti-corruption statutes. Mere compliance with ‘ethical' financial disclosure/conflict of interest laws accomplishes little. Citizens demand a higher, different sort of ethics from their public servants, and this sense of ethics in public service is captured by the honest services law now before the Supreme Court."

 

"Public servants, by definition and by their oath, take on new obligations, and they should not accept their respective positions if they do not want to live up to the higher standard paved with new obligations. The moral concepts framed by honest services law hold public servants more accountable for their actions because they see more, know more, have more power, receive pay from the citizens, and must make ethical decisions for the sake of the people they serve. The oath or affirmation public servants render upon taking their office – from "I do solemnly swear (or affirm)…" to "…I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter…" – contains a golden thread of practical but profound commitment to the higher ethical standard presupposed in honest services law, especially useful when public servants face conflicts of interest and the temptations and vagaries that position and power afford. If the (Supreme) court retreats from the moral position honest services law affords, the arsenal to fight public corruption will be greatly depleted."

  

   

  

 

 

    GOP Pledge architect admits the big hole in the GOP Pledge

Fri Sep 24, 2010 at 01:30:04 PM PDT

The most criticized element of the GOP Pledge is how little there is actually there. Specifically, what Republicans would actually cut in spending in order to bring the deficit under control and deliver promised tax cuts. Krugman:

The document repeatedly condemns federal debt — 16 times, by my count. But the main substantive policy proposal is to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, which independent estimates say would add about $3.7 trillion to the debt over the next decade — about $700 billion more than the Obama administration’s tax proposals.

True, the document talks about the need to cut spending. But as far as I can see, there’s only one specific cut proposed — canceling the rest of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which Republicans claim (implausibly) would save $16 billion. That’s less than half of 1 percent of the budget cost of those tax cuts. As for the rest, everything must be cut, in ways not specified — "except for common-sense exceptions for seniors, veterans, and our troops." In other words, Social Security, Medicare and the defense budget are off-limits.

With that in mind, this morning MSNBC's Savannah Guthrie and Chuck Todd grilled Rep. Kevin McCarthy, one of the leadership team behind the pledge, for how he would cut the federal budget. He couldn't name a single program he'd cut.

ThinkProgress caught it:

GUTHRIE: Everybody likes to cut spending, but the issue is where, how? What specifically are you going to cut? [...]

MCCARTHY: What are you going to cut? Discretionary spending. Anything that’s not security...

TODD: Well, hang on. What is discretionary? Give us two or three items that are discretionary.

MCCARTHY: You could go through every different program within government, outside of entitlements, outside of national defense, that is discretionary spending that Congress has control of. That has gone over 88 percent in the last two years.

GUTHRIE; So what comes to mind for that, if you could wave a magic wand and do it unilaterally, what would you cut?

TODD: If you had the line item.

MCCARTHY: The line item would be across-the-board.

Eventually they wore him down into saying that he would cut administrative spending in Congress, which could "save $100 million. So in a $3 trillion federal budget, with a $1.3 trillion deficit, McCarthy identified $100 million in savings, reducing the deficit by less than 0.01 percent. And those savings won’t even come out of a federal program."

One more time, the Republicans come up empty.

  • Permalink ::
  • Discuss  

     

      

      

    In spite of Republicans' claims that they are attempting to get hold of "out of control spending" and reduce the deficits, they refuse to own up to the fact that it was under a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS, and a REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT, Dubya, that our Federal deficit ballooned to over $11 TRILLION; BEFORE OBAMA ever took office; because of Tax Cuts, primarily for the richest 1% in the country ($4 Trillion unpaid for); two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ($1 Trillion of which was approved by Congress, and which is estimated to hit $3 Trillion by the time we pay for replacing all of the equipment and the medical bills for the troops injured during the conflicts ALSO UNPAID FOR);  "No Child Left Behind" (a Republican unfunded mandate that has buried schools in red tape - not paid for); Sensenbrenner's "Real ID" bill, (another Republican unfunded mandate - not paid for, which even Republican Governors consider unworkable, and have refused to impliment); the $700 Billion Medicare  boondoggle - direct giveaway to pharmaceutical companies, which was supposed to "trickle down" to patients; the $700 Billion TARP bailout started under Bush and Hank Paulson, and tens of trillions of dollars which Republicans allowed to just leave the country to hide in secret overseas bank accounts to avoid paying taxes (Remember former Republican Senator Phil Gramm, McCain's chief Presidential Advisor, who was co-Director of UBS in America, which specifically courted clients to hide their assets in illegal offshore accounts?)  Republican Presidential candidate, Governor Mike Huckabee, claimed during a Republican Primary debate that there was over $12 Trillion hidden in these accounts.  Republicans in the House argued to give Billionaires amnesty and waive all fees, penalties and jail time in order to "repatriate" anywhere from $12 to $20 Trillion hidden in secret illegal offshore accounts to avoid paying for TARP  (it didn't work by the way, it only brought in a few billion dollars - a tiny fraction of what is known to be offshore); to name a few.

     

    Question.  How could they know how much was hidden in these "secret, illegal, offshore accounts"?  The only way they could know even the estimates of what the totals are, are if they were involved in the coverup, and the scams to ship the money out of the country and have kept track of who hid how much money, in what secret accounts!  How much you wanna bet they were collecting payments to keep those secrets and allow the tax evasion to continue?

     

    But now Republicans are demanding a permanent extention to the Bush Tax Cuts which will add another $4 TRILLION to the deficit just out to 2018 ALONE.  That tax cut for billionaires, if allowed to become permanent would dwarf ALL of the stimulus programs under the Obama Administration which Republicans are claiming are "hurting" our economy, (even though all economic reports show that it has turned around what would have been a complete Global financial collapse.)

     

    That isn't even taking into account the hundreds of billions of dollars which corporations aren't required to pay in income taxes because Republicans have allowed two-thirds of all corporations to not pay ANY INCOME TAXES AT ALL, and have shifted the burden of those taxes onto property taxes for individuals and small business owners! 

     

    They keep demanding lower taxes (for the rich). 

     

    They just haven't let you in on the secret, that YOU have to pay for the taxes that THEY DON'T PAY.

     

    Oh, by the way, the unemployment checks which the State of Wisconsin has written over the last year, totals MORE THAN the State Deficit!

     

    So, if you or anyone you know is on unemployment, what do you think the Republicans will do to get rid of the deficit?

     

    They aren’t going to raise taxes on the wealthy or on corporations!  Say good bye to unemployment checks!

     

    Wake up people!  This scam has been going on for DECADES, and it makes Bernie Madoff look like a piker!  (And he got away with it, because for thirteen years, no one in the SEC was smart enough to even attempt to match what was in his reports and compare it with the documentation of ACTUAL TRADES.)  This isn't brain surgery.  It isn't rocket science.  All you have to do is OPEN YOUR EYES.

     

    Republicans managed to con people in California into believing that Governor Grey Davis (D) was responsible for the exorbitant fees that they were paying for energy rates that were being jacked up without limitation, by ENRON, which was fraudulently raising rates because REGULATION of the energy industry was ELIMINATED by the PREVIOUS Governor, Pete Wilson ( R ).  But instead of holding Pete Wilson responsible for HIS actions, the voters in California booted Grey Davis out of office in a special election, and voted Arnold Schwarzenegger ( R ) into office in a special election.  And who was Arnold's top campaign advisor?  Why, it was former Governor Pete Wilson ( R ) who created the mess in the first place!  (You'd think that voters might have seen the red flag and not fallen for the con, but no, they didn't.  They fell for it, hook, line and sinker).

     

    So, the voters fell for the con, voted to get rid of the guy who inherited the mess that was left behind by his predecessor, and then voted in the guy who was being advised by the guy who created the mess in the first place.  And then they voted him in for ANOTHER TERM.  Who says you can’t fool some people all of the time?

     

    And where is California now?  They still have forest fires that rage out of control.  And depending on what report you choose to believe, California is still running a deficit of anywhere from $19 to $26.3 Billion (it used to be over $40 Billion), but after slashing jobs and paying state employees with IOUs, they are still in a deep hole.  Ask yourselves if you want to end up in the same mess that they are in.  Arnold Schwarznegger bought the Governor's office with his celebrity and his bank account by blaming California's problems on Grey Davis, even though they were caused by Pete Wilson.  He hasn't followed up on his campaign promises.  The economy is in the tank and worse off than before.  They still have annual out of control forest fires.  As of October 22, 2010 Governor Schwarznegger's favorable ratings are at 23%, and he already has a new movie out.  Tell me, how did he have the time to do a movie when he has a full time job as Governor?  I guess if you aren't doing your job in the first place, there's plenty of time to fit it in.  Californian taxpayers should be demanding their money back.  They thought a billionaire superstar would turn their state around.  Instead they're being "Terminated". 

     

    Wisconsin, on the other hand, is doing better than most of the rest of the country.  The overall unemployment rate is actually better than the national average.  And in spite of the fact that Republicans are complaining about the state deficit of $2.5 Billion (over Two Years), in the worst economy since the Great Depression, it is still better than what it was when Republicans Tommy Thompson and Scott McCallum turned over the $3.2 Billion deficit to Democrats after 16 years of Republican Control, and the best economy this country had ever seen.  That is $700 MILLION better than what Republicans turned over to us, when they SHOULD HAVE been running a huge surplus.  Oh, yeah, they DID have a $500 million surplus (rainy day fund) but, Tommy Thompson gave it away in a tax rebate designed to buy votes.  Now, during an economic downturn when we NEED the surplus, there isn’t one to turn to.  (And that $3.2 Billion dollar figure is the most conservative estimate available.  Others go as high as $5.2 Billion, and those numbers are for ONE year, not over two years as is the case with the current state deficit.  Democrats did a better job with the budget, under the worst economic conditions, than Republicans did under the BEST economic conditions.)

     

    And if you look at the amount of money that Wisconsin taxpayers pay into the Federal Government through income taxes and what Wisconsin received BACK to pay for infrastructure or other expenses, you will find that over the last thirty years Wisconsin has only received about 81 cents for each dollar paid in Federal taxes.  That is because our Republican legislators in Congress have not fought for funding to pay for our expenses, WHICH WE ARE ENTITLED TO.  They claim that by not spending the money, they are keeping our taxes low, but in fact, YOU HAVE ALREADY PAID YOUR FEDERAL TAXES.  WE JUST AREN’T GETTING IT BACK.

     

    Instead, it is going to OTHER STATES, MOST OF WHICH ARE RED – or REPUBLICAN – STATES.  Coincidence?  I don’t think so.

     

    Democrats like Dave Obey, fought to get funding for his district by returning those Federal Tax dollars to his community.  That is why he was able to get re-elected so often.

     

    For the last almost four decades, Sensenbrenner has only brought back about 75 to 76 cents on the dollar.  HE HAS ALLOWED ALMOST 25% OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS TO GO TO OTHER STATES, OVER FOUR DECADES.  And because your local and state expenses STILL EXIST and we aren’t getting that funding back from the Federal Government, WE STILL HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WAYS TO PAY FOR THOSE EXPENSES.  That means that your state and local governments have to figure out a way TO RAISE YOUR TAXES to make up for the short fall that YOUR LEGISLATOR HASN’T BROUGHT BACK TO THE STATE.   Republicans don’t want to raise taxes on the rich or on corporations, so they instead raise your PROPERTY TAXES.

     

    Sensenbrenner has one of the WORST RECORDS for bringing YOUR TAX DOLLARS BACK TO OUR COMMUNITY, in the COUNTRY, as compared to other congressional districts.

     

    Yet, independent reports prove, that taxes have actually GONE DOWN for each of the last SIX YEARS under Democratic control, and is the LOWEST it has been in the last 50 years!  Better than any time that it was under Republican control!

     

    But what do facts matter?  As long as Republicans continue to tell lies, there are still those who will believe them.  Even AFTER Rush Limbaugh admitted that he had LIED to his listeners about the candidates and the issues running up to the 2008 election, people continue to listen to and believe a guy who is an admitted liar, a drug addict who illegally acquired drugs to feed his habit.  He never graduated from college, but turned his talent for insulting humor into a financial windfall because special interests want him to continue to spread his lies for their own benefit, to manipulate people to act against their own best interests and against the best interests of the country.

     

    You have a choice.  You can look at the facts and learn how to THINK for yourselves, or you can fall for the propaganda. 

 

    

WHERE ARE THE JOBS?  WHY GIVING THE MONEY TO BANKS AND BUSINESSES ISN'T TRICKLING DOWN.

 

CEOs of the 50 U.S. firms that cut the most jobs during the recession earned 42% more than the average S&P 500 firm CEO, according to a study released by a liberal think tank in Washington.

 

The study also found that 36 of the 50 layoff leaders announced their layoffs at a time of positive earnings reports, suggesting a trend of squeezing workers to boost profits and to maintain high CEO pay. When CEOs cut jobs they are often very richly rewarded.

 

No Wall Street banks were included in this list, but three banks (Bank Of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan) were on the list of the 50 firms that laid off the most employees.

 

Overall, the study shows that executive pay remains astronomically high compared to previous years. After adjusting for inflation, CEO pay in 2009 more than doubled the CEO pay average for the previous decade, more than quadrupled the CEO pay average for the 1980s, and ran approximately eight times the CEO average for all the decades of the mid-20th century. The study claims that CEOs of major U.S. companies make 263 times the average compensation of American workers.

 

Rank Company                  CEO                PAID       LAID OFF

1 Schering-Plough        Fred Hassan            $49.7M        16,000

2 Johnson & Johnson   William Weldon       $25.6M          8,900

3 Hewlett Packard       Mark Hurd              $24.2M          6,400

4 Walt Disney              Robert Iger              $21.5M          3,400

5 IBM                         Samuel Palmisano    $21.1M          7,800

6 AT                           Randall Stephenson  $20.2M        12,300

7 Walmart                   Michael Duke           $19.2M       13,350

8 Ford                        Alan Mullally             $17.9M         4,700

9 United Technologies Louis Chenevert        $17.9M       13,290

10 Verizon                  Ivan Seidenberg        $17.5M       21,308

 

 

Read more: http://www.facebook.com/l/ba5eaKdtNseQBwz7keeUGce2jZg;www.resumark.com/blog/sergey/the-10-highest-paid-ceos-who-laid-off-the-most-employees/#ixzz0z3nGsP6x

 

Want to do something about it?  DON'T DO BUSINESS WITH THESE COMPANIES!  BOYCOTT THEM PERMANENTLY!  DO BUSINESS WITH THEIR COMPETITORS WHO PROVIDE FAIR WAGES AND BENEFITS TO THEIR EMPLOYEES!  FORCE THESE COMPANIES AND THEIR BOARDS OF DIRECTORS TO FIRE THEIR EXECUTIVES, AND HIRE NEW ONES WHO WILL TREAT AND PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES FAIRLY!

 

 

 

 

 

What is telling about Republicans over the last few years is that they always claim that they are “Optimists”.  That would imply that they had a “Yes, We Can” attitude, but in fact they are doing the exact opposite, by repeatedly yelling “Hell, No you can’t”  (as in Minority Leader Boehner’s infamous tirade against Healthcare Reform). 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxYg7rPp_-g&feature=related

 

Yet another example of how their fraudulent application of framing manages to get people to believe something which isn’t true.

 

Here is the Democratic response to Boehner’s screams of “Hell, No you can’t!”

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmlgwwCHof8&feature=related

 

 

In spite of Republicans' claims that they are attempting to get hold of "out of control spending" and reduce the deficits, they refuse to own up to the fact that it was under a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS, and a REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT, Dubya, that our Federal deficit ballooned to over $11 TRILLION; because of Tax Cuts for the richest 1% in the country ($4 Trillion unpaid for); two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ($1 Trillion of which was approved by Congress, and which is estimated to hit $3 Trillion by the time we pay for replacing all of the equipment and the medical bills for the troops injured during the conflicts);  "No Child Left Behind" (a Republican unfunded mandate that has buried schools in red tape); Sensenbrenner's "Real ID" bill, (another Republican unfunded mandate, which even Republican Governors consider unworkable, and have refused to impliment); the $700 Billion Medicare  boondoggle - direct giveaway to pharmaceutical companies, which was supposed to "trickle down" to patients; the $700 Billion TARP bailout started under Bush and Hank Paulson, just to name a few.

 

But now Republicans are demanding a permanent extention to the Bush Tax Cuts which will add another $4 TRILLION to the deficit just out to 2018 ALONE.  That tax cut for billionaires, if allowed to become permanent would dwarf ALL of the stimulus programs under the Obama Administration which Republicans are claiming are hurting our economy.

 

That isn't even taking into account the hundreds of billions of dollars which corporations aren't required to pay in income taxes because Republicans have allowed two-thirds of all corporations to not pay ANY INCOME TAXES AT ALL, and have shifted the burden of those taxes onto property taxes for individuals and small business owners! 

 

They keep demanding lower taxes (for the rich). 

 

They just haven't let you in on the secret, that YOU have to pay for the taxes that THEY DON'T PAY.

 

 

 

 

     Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) Goes BALLISTIC Over GOP Opposition To 9/11 Responders Health Care Bill  - THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WHEN YOU FIGHT FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN, RATHER THAN GIVING LIP-SERVICE OR EXCUSES FOR NOT DOING YOUR JOB!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4zwCMf8dsc
 
Posted on YouTube: July 30, 2010
By YouTube Member: NewYorkLiberal

Excerpt from HuffPo article regarding this video:

House Republicans late Thursday were able to corral enough votes to defeat a bill that would have provided up to $7.4 billion in aid to those sickened by toxins resulting from the 9/11 attacks.

In the process, they set off a host of fiery speeches and denunciations from their Democratic colleagues and produced a veritable YouTube moment from Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y), whose district includes many of the affected.

Rest of article at this link (under their video):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/29/anthony-weiner...

Once again, Republicans show what they are made of, by refusing to assist the REAL HEROES of 9/11, instead of providing HEALTHCARE for their service, because they won't spend the $7.4 Billion for it, EVEN WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO DEMAND TRILLION$ OF DOLLAR$ IN TAX CUT$ FOR THE RICHE$T AMERICAN$!

Their actions are sleazy, irresponsible, reprehensible and beyond reproach!   

Congressman Anthony Weiner, Democrat from New York, called them out for their refusal to support the heroes of 9/11, as Republicans attempted to interrupt him by shouting him down so that the C-Span cameras couldn't record him holding them accountable for their actions.  Congressman Weiner exposed them for their actions to make sure that America knows that Republicans refused to support the 9/11 heroes, by voting against, and defeating the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which would have provided $7.4 Billion in aid to those sickened by the toxins they were exposed to at Ground Zero.  (The same toxins which the Bush Administration TOLD the EPA to claim that they didn't exist, after the EPA found that they DID.)

     http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/29/anthony-weiner-911-bill-ballistic_n_664568.html

 

    Republicans constantly complain about high taxes, but rather than DOING something about it, they pull PR stunts to make it APPEAR as if they are doing something when they REALLY AREN'T.  Republicans passed the largest tax cuts in U.S. History in 2001 and 2003, HALF OF WHICH WENT TO THE RICHEST 1% in AMERICA, but the $2 Trillion in tax cuts weren't coming out of surpluses, but rather being ADDED to the DEFICIT, which means that ANOTHER $1.7 TRILLION IN INTEREST was added to the Federal Deficit on TOP of the $2 Trillion in tax cuts!

     Now, they want to make those same tax cuts PERMANENT, so that millionaires and billionaires get their taxes cut EVEN FURTHER, WHILE YOUR'S GO UP!  If they are successful in making those tax cuts permanent, it will ADD ANOTHER $3.5 -$4 TRILLION to our Federal Deficit, just out to 2018.  It will cost MUCH MORE beyond 2018, because we'll be paying INTEREST ON TOP OF THE INTEREST, NOT JUST ON THE PRINCIPAL.

     And while they COMPLAIN about the current Wisconsin State Deficit, the fact is that our taxes are LOWER NOW over the last 6 years, under Democratic Control of the Governor's Office, and only after the last elections, when Democrats won control of Wisconsin's State Legislature as well.     

     And while our current State Budget Deficit is AT LEAST $700 MILLION LESS ($2.5 BILLION - over the next two years during the worst economy since the Great Depression - caused by Republican and BUSH's failed economic policy), than what it was when REPUBLICAN Governor SCOTT MCCALLUM left office in 2003 ($3.2 BILLION after a decade of the strongest economy the U.S. had ever seen), they claim that these are "record" deficits under a Democratic Governor!

     These are PURE FABRICATIONS of reality, because REPUBLICANS CAN'T RUN ON THEIR ACTUAL RECORD!             

      And even worse, they continue to run away from the fact that they are responsible for the MASSIVE SPENDING for TWO WARS WHICH HAVE FAILED TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT THEY CLAIMED THEY WOULD.  The Bush Administration and Republicans in Congress who drove us to war ON LIES, and have created a MONEY PIT, WHICH THEY NEVER INCLUDED IN OUR FEDERAL DEFICIT, so the numbers they reported for our Federal Deficit were far lower than the actual figures.  And it was never paid for, money was just printed up, and taxpayers haven't yet been handed the bills!

     When we first reported on these fraudulent discrepancies four years ago, Wisconsin's share of those unreported War Debts was OVER $5.5 Billion, and the 5th CD's share was almost $1 Billion.  Since then, the totals have increased, and so has our share of the war.

     Taxpayers in Wisconsin will NOW pay $16.7 billion for total Iraq and Afghanistan war spending since 2001.  

    The 5th CD's share is now $2.7 BILLION.  And, that figure will TRIPLE even if we pull out of the wars NOW, because of the ongoing costs of replacing equipment and healthcare costs from wounded veterans. 

    For the same amount of money, ($2.7 Billion), the following could have been provided:

449,692 People Receiving Low-Income Healthcare for One Year OR

42,577 Police or Sheriff's Patrol Officers for One Year OR

60,576 Firefighters for One Year OR

330,856 Scholarships for University Students for One Year OR

495,390 Students receiving Pell Grants of $5550 OR

1,263,518 Children Receiving Low-Income Healthcare for One Year OR

394,142 Head Start Slots for Children for One Year OR

806,753 Households with Renewable Electricity - Solar Photovoltaic for One Year OR

43,955 Elementary School Teachers for One Year OR

2,151,342 Households with Renewable Electricity-Wind Power for One Year

 

   The 5th CD's share of the war debt IS MORE THAN THE CURRENT Wisconsin State Deficit.  Tell me, WHY Republicans aren't clamoring to stop THOSE continued costs which are BURYING US.

   Could it be that it is because THEY WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING THEM? 

   Republicans had complete control of Congress and the White House when they wiped out the surplus and balanced budget that was created under President Clinton.

   Then they created an $11 Trillion deficit including a combined

   $1 Trillion plus cost of the war,

   over $2 Trillion in tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires,

   another $1.7 Trillion in INTEREST payments on the tax cuts which put us further in debt, without paying down the principal.

   And with the repeated crashes in the stock market (the one in September 2008 wiped out about 40% of the entire value of the stock market - about $18 Trillion);

   crashes in the housing market (not because of "poor people who couldn't afford their mortgages weren't paying them", as Republicans fraudulently claim, but because millionaires and billionaires were DUMPING speculative investments and walking away from much more expensive projects which had a much more devastating effect on the economy);

   and banking and insurance industries because of lack of regulations, allowed unlimited betting on risky investments and ended up paying out 14 to 1 on credit default obligations in the range of several hundreds of Billions of dollars;

   the losses of those hundreds of billions and even trillions of dollars which were no longer being made available by the banks as loans to small and even larger businesses, and the increased costs of premiums and reduced benefits by insurance companies who had to make up their losses by increasing fees on their remaining customers, wiped out tens of millions of jobs - eliminating several Trillions of dollars in the income taxes needed to support our infrastructure. 

   And during all this time, Republicans had been giving tens of billions of dollars of tax cuts to companies which earn hundreds of billions of dollars in profits in this country, but don't pay any income taxes to the United States.  They gave $35 Billion in support to the oil industry, and over $500 Billion to the pharmaceutical industry.  They fought to give millionaires and billionaires the right to get reduced interest rate mortgages on second and third homes and vacation homes, but voted against any assistance to working Americans on their ONLY residence.

   Two thirds of all corporations in the United States pay NOTHING in income taxes, even though most of them earn more than $250 MILLION annually.

   Exxon Mobil earned over $42 Billion in profits in 2008, but because of their tax shelters in the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, paid a much lower rate of income tax in those tax shelter havens, but paid NOTHING in income taxes to the United States.  And, to add insult to injury, because of tax laws which give rebates to companies who pay taxes to OTHER COUNTRIES, the IRS PAID EXXON MOBIL $46 MILLION! 

   The massive deficit we are facing was primarily caused by a complete lack of regulations over the massive "to big to fail" corporations which we had to bail out, and repaid us by axing millions of jobs, and by the massive tax cuts which were and are still being given to individuals and corporations who don't need them, and by their selfish and destructive actions, often don't deserve them.

    These were Republican policies which caused all of these problems to occur in the first place.  And these are the same policies which Republicans continue to espouse, regardless of who is damaged by them; and which they will continue to advance, as long as an ignorant public allows them to stay in a position to do so.

   The proof is in their continued blaming of those who are actually DOING SOMETHING to clean up their mess, as they continue to pile on even more messes for us to clean up.   Because Democrats have worked to prevent a complete financial meltdown (which Republicans would have benefited from, because they could then step in and buy up everything for pennies on the dollar at all of the going out of business sales), so they couldn't take advantage of everyone and own everything everyone has worked for all of your lives.

    Republicans DIDN'T CARE ANYTHING about the deficit when they ran it up to $11 Trillion, and kept telling everyone that the economy was strong and the nation was healthy.

   But as soon as Democrats threw a healthcare lifeline to over 30 million Americans who wouldn't have otherwise had access to it; and eliminated pre-conditions and lifetime limits; by investing $800 to $900 Billion in the HEALTH of American CITIZENS; passed extensions of unemployment benefits; passed regulations on banks and insurance companies so they couldn't perform a repeat of the economic meltdown of 2008; and required banks and credit card companies to give customers fair and accurate loans and lines of credit, they scream "foul!"

    They've stood in the way of any legislation which gives average workers a break.  They voted against equal pay for women, and have stood in the way of providing proper and ongoing healthcare to returning vets.  And just recently, they voted down the legislation which would have provided $7.4 Billion in compensation and medical care to the heroes of 9/11, who worked in the toxic environment of Ground Zero, which doctors and environmental experts, and even the EPA agreed was a toxic atmosphere, until the Bush Administration forced the EPA to proclaim that the environment was clean of toxins.

   They claimed in a cowardly fashion, that "they couldn't support the legislation because it wasn't fashioned in quite the way that they could support it".  The fact was that, they attempted to insert amendments into the bill, which would not be something that Democrats would support, in order to get them to vote for them as part of the amended bill, and then tried to improperly manipulate procedures on the floor of the House to cover up what they had done.  

     So, Republicans want you to forget that they were responsible for the $11 Trillion deficit and the global economic meltdown, and refused to do anything to clean up their own mess, but then blamed Democrats for putting safety nets in place to protect the public from the damage that Republicans caused, "because it might add another $1 Trillion to the deficit".  At the same time, they are demanding that the Bush Tax Cuts for the millionaires and billionaires become permanent, which would create another $4 Trillion in deficits, just out to 2018 ALONE.  And they want you to believe that THEY are truly interested in deficit reduction?

   The facts speak for themselves, they are only interested in continued tax cuts for for the wealthy.  They want their continued tax benefits, even as they benefit far beyond what anyone could consider reasonable, as others starve, and lose everything they've worked for all of their lives.  Republicans have been in control of Congress and the White House over the majority of the last 30 years.

   Yet, they complain that they pay too much in taxes, even as they have "gamed the system", and increased their compensation by 4500% over the last 30 years while reducing their effective tax rate to be lower than middle income workers, and average workers have only barely made a cost of living increase while their income tax rates have gone up.

   At the same time, Corporations have reduced their share of General Tax Revenues to almost a third of what they paid 30 years ago.  In order for the government to continue to cover their expenses, (the huge portion which corporations are no longer paying for), they have had to raise income taxes and property taxes on small businesses and individuals.  And that policy will continue to be even more oppressive on small businesses and individuals, as long as Republicans are allowed to advance their tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.   

   What they also don't tell you, is that local, state and Federal government organizations make up 38% of the total U.S. economy.   When Banks and Insurance companies, and Mortgage firms, and major manufacturing industries continued to lay off workers, in spite of getting bailouts from the government, (i.e. YOU the taxpayers), there wasn't any entity large enough to have a positive effect on the economy to stimulate it, EXCEPT the government.

   The more people who are working, including government workers, the more they support other businesses and THEIR employees, so any dollars spent in stimulus efforts multiply in their effect to keep more people working and stimulate job creation.  And, as more people are working, more people pay taxes to repay the stimulus investment, and reinvest in our infrastructure.

   The difference between Republican spending and Democratic spending of your tax dollars, is that Republican love to buy bombs and military toys which take up the majority of our annual spending, and which don't give a return on investment, because they get blown up and destroyed, so that they have to be constantly replaced.  They are constantly increasing costs of overhead, and are consistently coming in  far over budget.  They claim they are fighting for their country.

   Our budget for military spending used to be greater than the next 20 countries combined.  Then it was greater than the next 30 countries combined.  Under Bush, it became greater than ALL of the countries of the world combined. 

   Democrats INVEST in infrastructure and PEOPLE HERE AT HOME.  If we don't, we won't have any country left to fight for.

   The solution to our economic problems is actually very simple.

   Everyone needs to pay their fair share in taxes.

   Those who earn more, and benefit more from government policy or infrastructure should pay more. 

   Corporations should not be allowed to eliminate their tax responsibilities because they outsource their labor, or offshore their headquarters.  And, if they do outsource or offshore their headquarters, then they should pay MORE in taxes, and at a higher rate, with no tax rebate advantages to prevent them from gaining an unfair advantage on their competition who keep their jobs and headquarters here at home. 

   And businesses which employ more employees here at home should be the ones getting tax advantages, because their employees will be paying taxes here, and buying things and supporting other businesses here at home, while businesses which outsource and offshore are sending that money and those jobs OUT OF THIS COUNTRY.

     

 

 

     SO, IF THE HIGHEST EARNING COMMUNITIES IN WISCONSIN HAVE REPUBLICANS REPRESENTING THEM, THEN WHY WERE WE GETTING SO LITTLE BACK TO THE STATE, UNDER THEIR "LEADERSHIP"?

     BECAUSE THE MONEY WAS BEING SHIFTED FROM "BLUE STATES" TO "RED STATES"!  Republicans have been taking YOUR MONEY, and shifting it to RED STATES, to give them more than their fair share, to BUY THEIR VOTES!  Compare the States which received the MOST back FROM the Feds, to the States which received the LEAST back FROM the Feds by clicking on the link below.

     http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/22685.html

     This is based on the most recent data available from Taxfoundation.org .  The data collected between 1981 to 2005 was compiled in 2007.

     You can also find the same conclusions in this study:     

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/196644-red-states-blue-states-and-the-distribution-of-federal-spending

 

     In 2008 Wisconsin ranked third from the bottom in receiving Federal Funds per capita out of all the states in the country.  http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/cffr-08.pdf

 

    

                     Blast From The Past

 

       http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/lnakamoto/2006/my-statement-and-questions-for-sensenbrenner-at-thiensville-village-hall-june-26-2006/

 

26
June
2006   

   My Statement and Questions for Sensenbrenner at Thiensville Village Hall June 26, 2006

 

     Sorry there weren’t more of you there.  There was a cameraperson/reporter for Spivak and Bice and a reporter from the San Francisco Chronicle covering why Senselessbrenner is so jacked up about immigration, given that he is in a district that is soooooooo far away from the Mexican border.  (Beeeeeee  Afwaaaaid, Vewy, Veeewy Afwaaaaaid!)  Picture Sensenbrenner dressed up as Elmer Fudd hunting those "wascally wabbits".

 

 “   I’d like to make a statement which you don’t need to comment on, and then I would like to ask some questions which I will ask you to answer.

      I’ve previously told other Town Hall audiences of the fact that many Skin Head and Ku Klux Klan groups around the country are rallying around your anti-immigrant legislation, and that there had been a marked increase in violent acts against immigrants, while hate crime legislation has not been invoked in prosecuting the perpetrators of these crimes.  (Republicans were still in control of Congress at the time, and Sensenbrenner was still Chair of the Judiciary Committee.)

 

      Your proposed legislation is stirring up a division in this country and increasing hate crimes across the country, yet you have refused to speak out against those actions and the groups and individuals who are committing those crimes.

 

      In your latest “newsletter” propaganda piece, you have in the questionnaire portion, a question asking “Would you support a law protecting grieving family members from anti-war protestors while attending the funeral of an American soldier?”

     

     You know that that question is a lie because the protestors are not anti-war at all.  They are far right lunatics led by the Rev. Fred W. Phelps Sr. and his Westboro Baptist Church out of Topeka, Kansas who are anti-gay and claim that God is striking down America and our soldiers because in his words “America tolerates Gays”.  That isn’t an anti-war message.  It is the message of right wing lunatics.   And you have falsely attributed those actions to anti-war protestors who want this war and the killing to stop.

 

     In an earlier Town Hall meeting I asked you why it was that the Medicare Prescription Part D Legislation did very little to help the senior citizens with their high costs of prescription drug care, and instead gave hundreds of billions of dollars to the Pharmaceutical Drug Companies.  Your response at that time was that “That’s the way it works.”  You claimed that by giving the drug companies the money, that that would somehow indirectly result in help to seniors and patients who need help with their medication costs.  Yet, in a Town Hall meeting in Glendale on April 29th, you stated that “The thing is that Medicare Part D gives at least four hundred billion dollars of help to senior citizens!”

        

     Now, YOU know that that is not true, and I know that that is not true, so I feel that you should either back up that statement with proof that that money is indeed going directly to senior citizens, and not to the drug companies, or you should publicly retract that statement.  You also did not recuse yourself from the votes on that legislation, even though the bulk of your stock holdings are in the Pharmaceutical Drug companies who benefited from the legislation which you voted for.

 

     You voted against aid for the Katrina victims, Americans, because you claimed that there weren’t enough accounting safeguards put in place to avoid misappropriations and outright theft. Yet you voted time and time again to fund the “rebuilding of Iraq” a quagmire which is now approaching half a trillion dollars, and has lasted longer than the U.S. involvement in World War II, without any accounting safeguards from contractors and a foreign government which barely has any infrastructure at all, with billions of dollars in no bid contracts going to Halliburton, which you hold stock in.

          

      I’ve also asked you on at least seven separate occasions to investigate the use of Depleted Uranium munitions on the part of the U.S. military, and get them to stop using it because of the overwhelming scientific evidence from experts around the world who have publicly testified to the toxic effects and the dangers to anyone exposed to it.  In initial discussions, you’ve either falsely claimed that

 

1) “the question is why Saddam Hussein had possession of Depleted Uranium munitions.”  Anyone who knows anything about DU weapons knows that they were developed by the United States and Britain and that Saddam Hussein didn’t have them.  (Sensenbrenner is using a classic "redirect/misdirect tactic" to send your attention somewhere else so you don't pay attention to the fact that he hasn't answered the question!  It is what magicians use so that you don't pay attention to what he is doing.) 

 

2) You claimed you didn’t know anything about it and would look into it, or hadn’t had enough time to get the information because you’d only had a couple of months to work on it (this was in late 2004 and early 2005 when I had first brought this to your attention.  But in fact, you already were aware of it by that time because Congressman Jim McDermott (D – Washington), had by that time already submitted two bills in the House starting in March of 2003, with HR 1483, which was delayed in committee, and then had to be resubmitted again in May of 2005 HR 2410, and he had contacted every member of Congress to let them know about this bill.  Yet you acted like you didn’t know anything about it.  It was again submitted as HR 5122, section 716, which finally passed on May 11th of this year. (2006)

 

3) You’ve also claimed on various occasions that DU was classified as a matter of National Security, yet there is plenty of documentation on it that has been released by various scientific and medical groups who have been studying DU for over 15 years now, and is freely available over the internet through groups like Physicians for Social Responsibility (Dr. Helen Caldicott’s group),  www.miltoxproj.org  http://traprockpeace.org/depleteduranium.html .  Leuren Moret, a geoscientist who worked at two U.S. Nuclear Weapons laboratories and turned whistleblower, and Dr. Doug Rokke, the Pentagon's top expert on Depleted Uranium munitions who had been interviewed and testified on numerous occasions as to the hazards of Depleted Uranium which has caused 250,000 soldiers from the first Gulf war to become completely and permanently disabled, 15,000 soldiers to die, and over 425,000 soldiers to become ill, out of the 697,000 who served for three weeks in Iraq and were exposed to anywhere from 350-800 Tons of DU. We now have over 1,000,000 soldiers and 24,000,000 Iraqi civilians who have been exposed to more than 2200 Tons of DU during this war.  And oursoldiers have served for as long as three tours of duty and some are entering their fourth tour.  Over a year on each tour, with no protection.

  

   You claimed that “the Department of Defense claimed that DU saves lives and is safe”, and that that was your “final word on the matter” so I ask the members of this audience to look at these pictures and tell you whether they believe that DU is safe and whether or not you and the Department of Defense are telling them the truth.  Genocide and Mass Murder of not only millions of Iraqis, but of our own military being put on the ground, and their spouses and children, are being affected by this, and yet you do nothing.  (At this point, I take out pictures that have been posted online by doctors who have been treating the victims of Depleted Uranium radiation poisoning.  I hold them up and show them to the audience and at Sensenbrenner and ask them if they believe that these children have not been affected by DU and ask them again if they really believe Sensenbrenner and the Department of Defense when they tell them that DU is safe.  Gasps from the crowd.  Sensenbrenner doesn’t say a word.)  I pass them to members of the audience and ask them to pass them along so everyone can see them.  You can see them at: http://www.barremore.net/depleted-uranium-kills.html )

 

      Jim Ott, the former weatherman who is running for Curt Gielow’s seat as a Republican, is sitting behind me.  I find out later, that Jim Ott, with the assistance of the other Republican plants in the audience, has gathered up the pictures, and placed them face down underneath his seat so that no one further away from me has an opportunity to view the pictures!!!  What does he hope to gain by covering up the fact that this (Republican majority controlled at the time), government is hiding the fact that DU is killing children, not just Iraqis, but U.S. Military children because of the damage to their DNA!!!???  Would a moral, God fearing Christian person who cares about children, intentionally hide evidence of a crime against them?  Ask him yourself, the next time you have a chance, why he hid the pictures from the view of the rest of the people in the audience.)

      I've been a constituent of yours for almost as long as you have been in politics.  Yet, I’ve never felt that you have ever spoken for me, stood up for me, nor did the right thing in my interests or in the interests of the majority of the people of your district. You’ve managed time and time again, with your political ties and your financial influence, to pull the wool over the majority of this District’s voters’ eyes to get them to vote for you and your policies, which hurt them economically and in the view of the majority of the world’s opinion of these United States.  Your tirades and outbursts in Congress are a continual source of embarrassment for many of us, and your continual support of this current administration’s policies while breaking over 750 laws, without so much as a question, let alone a Grand Jury Investigation which would put Bush, Cheney and the rest of his administration under oath.

      On previous occasions, I’ve asked a number of different questions about a number of different issues as I’ve outlined earlier, and while we may both disagree on the merits of the issues, as you’ve stated time and time again in support of your anti-immigrant legislation, “It is important to start the discussion.”  I would agree that that is the case, but I would submit to you and to this audience that it is important for all parties to be involved in all of the discussions, and not to just pick and choose depending on what is politically advantageous, and avoid what is politically embarrassing.

 

     Now I ask you.

      I’ve asked these questions before on several occasions and you have not answered them, so I would like for you to answer them now, instead of just blowing them off and avoiding them as usual.”

 

     Sensenbrenner moves on without missing a beat.  Ignoring what he chooses to.  Classic Senselessbrenner.

 

     Do you think he cares about our troops, or their spouses, or their children?

  

     Think about this every time you hear about one of them who dies young and mysteriously from some illness that goes unexplained.

 

    Think about this every time you hear about a child who is born with horrendous birth defects and at least one of their parents served in the military.

 

     Then ask yourself if Sensenbrenner is a Patriot.

 

    Ask yourself if any Republican who covers this up is a Patriot.

 

    Ask yourself if you are doing enough to get your friends, neighbors, relatives and representatives in any political office to give a damn about what is happening.

 

    Then ask yourself what would happen, and how you would feel, if it happened to you.

      New information has come out about Depleted Uranium SHOWING that the PENTAGON has KNOWN ABOUT the Dangers of (UN)Depleted Uranium since 1993.

 

      SO - DID THE PENTAGON LIE TO COVER IT UP, OR DID SENSENBRENNER?  (OR BOTH?)

      http://www.truth-out.org/document-reveals-military-was-concerned-about-gulf-war-vets-exposure-depleted-uranium61781

 

    Document Reveals Military Was Concerned About Gulf War Vets' Exposure to Depleted Uranium

      by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | Report

 

     For years, the government has denied that depleted uranium (DU), a radioactive toxic waste left over from nuclear fission and added to munitions used in the Persian Gulf and Iraq wars, poisoned Iraqi civilians and veterans.

 

But a little-known 1993 Defense Department document written by then-Brigadier Gen. Eric Shinseki, now the secretary for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), shows that the Pentagon was concerned about DU contamination and the agency had ordered medical testing on all personnel that were exposed to the toxic substance.

 Memorandum," makes some small revisions to the details of these three orders from the DoD:

1. Provide adequate training for personnel who may come in contact with DU contaminated equipment.

2. Complete medical testing of all personnel exposed to DU in the Persian Gulf War.

3. Develop a plan for DU contaminated equipment recovery during future operations.

 

    The VA, however, never conducted the medical tests, which may have deprived hundreds of thousands of veterans from receiving medical care to treat cancer and other diseases that result from exposure to DU.

 

     The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center recently reported that ten years of data confirm that service members tend to have higher rates of certain cancers compared to civilians, according to the Army Times. While researchers suspected that service members are diagnosed with cancer more often and at a younger age because they have guaranteed access to health care and mandatory exams, the data does not explain the disparities in diagnosis among branches of the military. For example, the rate of lung cancer among sailors is twice that of other branches, while Marines have much lower cancer rates across the board.

 

    On Tuesday, the VA's ongoing failure to treat and diagnose Gulf War related illnesses came up during a House Veterans Affairs subcommittee hearing where a veterans advocacy group urged Shinseki to undertake comprehensive research on the correlation between chronic illness and exposure to DU in munitions during the Gulf War.

  

     Armed with Shinseki's August 19, 1993 memo, Veterans for Common Sense (VCS), said the VA, and Shinseki in particular, have "a rare opportunity for a second chance."

 

     Shinseki's memo, under the subject line, "Review of Draft to Congress - Health and Environmental Consequences of Depleted Uranium in the U.S. Army -- Action

"   In military terms, VCS asks VA for a ceasefire," said Paul Sullivan, the executive director for VCS. "VCS urges VA leadership to stop and listen to our veterans before time runs out, as VA is killing veterans slowly with bureaucratic delays and mismanaged research that prevent us from receiving treatments or benefits in a timely manner."

 

     Sullivan, himself a Gulf War veteran, told the subcommittee that the VA has refused to listen to scientists and veterans who are concerned about DU, leaving thousands of veterans suffering from chronic illnesses related to the conflict unsure if they will ever receive a solid diagnosis to justify the benefits and treatment they need.

 

     Of the 697,000 men and woman who served in Gulf War operations Desert Storm and Desert Shield between 1990 and 1991, about 250,000 suffer from symptoms collectively known as "Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses." The symptoms include fatigue, weakness, gastrointestinal problems, cognitive dysfunction, sleep disturbances, persistent headaches, skin rashes, respiratory conditions and mood changes, according to the VA.

 

     The VCS also petitioned Shinseki to investigate the 2009 termination of a $75 million research project on Gulf War illnesses at the University of Texas medical center. Last year the VCS filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for records of the "internal sabotage" of Gulf War Veterans Illnesses research and the intentional delaying of research and treatment, according to Sullivan. The VA has yet to release any documents about the impeded research, and VCS filed a FOIA appeal on June 29.

 

     Sullivan said the VCS simply wants the government to support independent testing on veterans exposed to DU, but the Department of Defense prefers a "don't look, don't find policy."

 

     "As a Gulf War veteran, I have watched too many of my friends die without answers, without treatment, and without benefits," Sullivan said. "In a few cases, veterans completed suicide due to Gulf War illness and the frustration of dealing with VA."

 

     Sullivan testified as disturbing reports have emerged in recent months from Fallujah, Iraq, about the skyrocketing rates of birth defects and cancer,  which are being blamed on DU-laced bombs and munitions used by US and British forces during a brutal coalition assault on the city in 2004. Iraqi human rights officials are reportedly planning to file a lawsuit.

 

   Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.

 

     DU is a dense metal added to munitions and bombs to pierce tanks and armor, and the military seems to chose unrestricted use of the radioactive substance over its soldiers' safety. Sullivan told Truthout that original medical tests ordered in a 1993 memo, which also called for personnel to be trained in dealing with contaminated equipment, were canceled after a training video scared soldiers.

 

"   It was pulled after [the training video] was seen by some soldiers who became upset when they saw soldiers in moon suits holding Geiger counters, and the military realized that the training could present a problem in the battlefield where soldiers need to disregard exposure issues while trying to kill the enemy," Sullivan said.

 

      Sullivan said that the DU "follow-up" program the VA consistently references was inadequate as it consisted of sporadic studies on only a small fraction of estimated 400,000 veterans exposed to the radioactive heavy metal.

"   The VA does not listen to expert scientists. The VA does not even listen to Congress," Sullivan said in his testimony. "Two decades of inaction have already passed. Gulf War veterans urgently want to avoid the four decades of endless suffering endured by our Vietnam War veterans exposed to Agent Orange."

 

     Sullivan said it took 40 years and an act of Congress to fund and sanction independent studies that proved the VA was responsible for providing benefits to soldier suffering from Agent Orange-related diseases.

 

     The VA now recognizes that exposure to Agent Orange, an herbicide sprayed across Vietnam to kill foliage and expose guerrilla fighters, has plagued veterans with several deadly diseases and disorders.

   VCS also advocated for the research on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that became the foundation of new PTSD rules, making it easier for veterans to receive benefits.

 

     Last week, the VA announced $2.8 million worth of research on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses, a sum Sullivan called "paltry." A VA press release announcing the research does not mention DU. The release references a recent Institute of Medicine report that identified the quarter million veterans affected by various symptoms associated with Gulf War illness, which "cannot be ascribed to any psychiatric disorder and likely result from genetic and environmental factors, although the data are not strong enough to draw conclusions about specific causes." 

  

     Popular medical science holds that kidney damage is the primary health problem associated with exposure to high amounts of DU. The heavy metal is 60 percent as radioactive as natural uranium, and is also linked to lung cancer in some cases and leukemia in even fewer cases, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

 

     Some critics have claimed that the WHO and governments have suppressed links between DU and cancer.

 

     The debate over the use of DU in conventional warfare will rage on as the Fallujah fallout continues, but according to Sullivan, there is only one way for thousands of Gulf War veterans at home to know the truth and receive the relief they deserve.

 

     "After 20 years of waiting, we refuse to wait on more empty promises from VA. The first step is for Secretary Shinseki and Chief of Staff Gingrich to immediately clean house of VA bureaucrats who have so utterly and miserably failed our veterans for too long," said Sullivan, vowing to petition Congress if the VA refuses to respond.

  

    "Our waiting must end now."


This work by Truthout is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

 

 -    MORE ON DU    http://www.truth-out.org/search/node/Depleted+Uranium

 

Power Rankings for Members of Congress by Year

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1659179/posts

 

      In 2006, Sensenbrenner was ranked 5th most powerful member in Congress.

 

(    The information came from Congress.org  Knowlegis)

 

   http://ezpetition.com/congressorg/power_rankings/search_results.ttaction=lastsearch&last=Sensenbrenner&submit.x=8&submit.y=9

 

      In 2008, Sensenbrenner dropped down to 305th most powerful member in Congress.

 

Name

Score

Rank in House

Rep. Sensenbrenner (R-WI 5th)

11.88

305

 

“    Congressman Sensenbrenner, given that you’ve been in office for more than three decades, and that you were ranked by Congress.org Knowlegis, as the 5th most powerful member of Congress in 2006, but were ranked 305th most powerful member of Congress in 2008, dropping 300 positions to a position just above Freshmen Congressmen, just how can you explain to your constituents that you are in any position to help them, or be effective or influential IN ANY WAY?”

 

      On August 5, 2010 Wolf Blitzer complained about Obama saying that Bush’s policies were responsible for the economic situation that we are in now, claiming that sitting Presidents “don’t criticize policies of previous presidents” as a matter of protocol.  Funny, but he never said that when Bush repeatedly criticized Clinton’s policies, and blamed him for the Recession which he claimed started in March 2000, even though it actually started in March 2001, two months after Bush took office.  And that was even though all legitimate official economic records, even those which were kept DURING the Bush Administration showed that the Recession started in March 2001.  The mass media talking heads, which right-wingers criticize as being “liberals”, were actually providing cover for Bush and his policies, in support for extremist right wing policies, by not reporting on a fabrication being represented as fact, even though it was an OBVIOUS misrepresentation.  They aren’t liberals, a fact made particularly obvious when they cover for Bush’s and Republican Lies.

 

           

    

 

 

 

T This day, July 4th, celebrates the birth of our nation, by throwing off the yoke of a tyrant (King George III of England); who ruled by unquestioned authority and the largest military power in the world at the time, while ignoring the will of the people.

 

     The colonists declared their independence by adopting the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, our 3rd President, and the founder of the Democratic Party, on July 4th, 1776.

 

      It bears repeating our Declaration of Independence, because so many people don’t know what it says, and don’t comprehend the significance of the meanings behind the words.  And, most Republicans (who battle against any idea Democrats have), also demonstrate that they don’t support the principles which led to the creation of our nation.  It bears pointing out those principles, and demand that our elected officials today, follow the principles which were outlined in our founding documents, rather than making excuses for ignoring them.

     

      The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription


     

       IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

      The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

      When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

 

      He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither
, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

      In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

      Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.  

      We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


          

      It is very clear, when reading the Declaration of Independence, that there is a drastic disconnect between our Declaration of Independence and the public positions of the Republican Party, their supporters and their elected officials.

 

     Republicans opposed the creation of Social Security, Medicare and Health Care reform, and are actively working to eliminate them.

 

     Rather than supporting laws that protect the public good, they continually side with special interests and corporations which repeatedly ignore the rights of the public, even when those corporations aren’t even American corporations.  (BP is a good example of this.  BP is a British Corporation, which was granted waivers, from VP Cheney, for the installation of basic safety equipment, automatic shutoff valves and relief wells which might have prevented the current Gulf Oil Disaster.  Halliburton, the company that VP Cheney used to be the CEO of, and which provided Cheney with a $34 million “signing bonus” upon becoming the Vice President of the United States, is another example of this, having been provided contracts for the U.S. military on a no-bid basis, even though Halliburton off-shored their corporate headquarters to Dubai, United Arab Emerites, so that it wouldn’t have to pay U.S. taxes.)

 

     By his actions, former Vice President Cheney (Republican) allowed a foreign corporation, BP, to destroy the Gulf region with an oil spill of an estimated hundred million gallons or more of oil, which engulfed over 60,000 square miles several weeks ago, and which continues to expand every day.

 

     The Supreme Court of the United States, currently controlled by a majority of Justices who were appointed by Republican Presidents and Congresses have repeatedly obstructed justice and denied rights of the PEOPLE, in order to grant extraordinary powers to CORPORATIONS – EVEN FOREIGN CORPORATIONS, which effectively denies the citizens of the United States the right to sovereign rule, by their own choices, rather than by the choices of those FOREIGN CORPORATIONS.

     

     This usurpation of the rights of the PEOPLE has been most recently demonstrated in the Supreme Court Ruling of “Citizens United vs. The FEC”.  Citizens United is a Republican front organization claiming to be “grassroots”, but demanded that corporations have the same rights as people, so that they could “vote” by spending unlimited amounts of money to support or oppose candidates for elective office, even if those corporations are owned by foreign nations or individuals.  This is a clear violation of the Constitutional principle  We the People of the United States…”  and of the 9th and 10th Amendments (part of the Bill of Rights), which guarantee the rights of THE PEOPLE.  There is NO SUCH PROTECTION UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION FOR CORPORATIONS.

 

   Amendment IX

     The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


   Amendment X

     The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 

     And Republicans, rather than debating issues on their merits and the facts, have chosen instead, to spread rumors and absolute lies in order to gain support from people who are completely unaware of the truth, and disinterested in getting the facts.  This is, in fact, an attempt to excite “domestic insurrections” against our legally elected officials, and create anarchy and chaos.

     

    Taxes have been continually shifted from corporations to individuals, and to property taxes, under Republican Rule, over the past 30 years. 

 

     Currently 2/3rds of ALL Corporations in the United States pay NO income taxes.  2/3rds of ALL Corporations in the State of Wisconsin pay NO income taxes.  As a result, YOUR individual income taxes, and YOUR property taxes have gone UP to make up for the lost revenues which corporations USED TO PAY.

In Wisconsin, an estimated 12% of all tax revenues USED TO COME from income taxes from corporation.  Under Republican Governors and Legislatures, that dropped down to about 5% of all tax revenues.  When Republicans cut taxes for corporations, THEY RAISED THEM FOR PROPERTY OWNERS.  That is why property taxes are so high, and make up so much of our total tax revenues.

 

     Under Governor Doyle, that corporate tax revenue has risen slightly to the point that corporate income taxes now are up to about 7-8% of all the tax revenues collected in Wisconsin.  That KEEPS YOUR PROPERTY TAXES DOWN.  In fact, taxes in Wisconsin are at their lowest IN 50 YEARS, in the last six years under DEMOCRATS.

 

      Latest Wisconsin Department of Revenue Reports Show Wisconsin State and Local Tax Rankings LOWEST since 1961-1962!  Dropping for Six Straight Years Under Democratic Control!

 

(    Scott Walker says Governor Doyle has been a big spender, but the reality is that he's spent considerably less than Republican Governor Tommy Thompson, whose spending policies as a legislator, Walker VOTED FOR.  But what do facts matter, coming from Republicans?)

 

      Republicans are complaining about the fact that the State of Wisconsin has a current Budget Deficit of about $2.5 Billion this year, during the worst economic environment since the Great Depression.  Yet, they didn't have any complaints when Republican Governors Tommy Thompson and Scott McCallum left the state with a $3.2 Billion Budget Deficit, which Democratic Governor Doyle inherited in 2003, from Republicans, after nearly a decade of ECONOMIC PROSPERITY.  Can you say HYPOCRISY?

 

     We are still $700 MILLION better off than when Republicans left the state in a Financial MESS, when they spent money hand over fist, and threw away the state's "Rainy Day Fund", which had over $500 million in it for emergencies, giving it away to the richest taxpayers in Wisconsin TO BUY THEIR VOTES!  But, of course, all they have to tell you is that they are right and Democrats are wrong, and they expect you to just lap it up, because they don't think you have been paying attention.  HAVE YOU?   

 

     Governor Doyle has a better record than the previous Republican Governors, and they are spinning it to appear as if he's done a worse job. 

 

     Do Republicans have no shame?  Obviously not.

 

     Reported by The Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, Milwaukee Magazine and The Department of Revenue independently finding the same story:

"Wisconsin’s rankings are their lowest in nearly 50 years and have improved for six consecutive years, unprecedented in state history….In addition, a recently released Ernst and Young study prepared for the Council on State Taxation shows Wisconsin’s business tax ranking now ranks 30th – well below the national average."

     

      COST (Council on State Taxation) also reports that state and local business taxes across the country decreased by 3.5% from FY2008 to FY2009.  On average, state and local business taxes across the country only amount to about 9% of all state and local taxes on businesses, while Wisconsin's rate is below the average, and has been on the decline.  (Wisconsin's corporate income tax rates are less than 11 other states, AND 2/3rds of all Wisconsin corporations pay NOTHING in income tax - per Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue records.)

 

      And, it should be remembered that because of decades of Wisconsin fiscal policy, which has favored corporations, and cut their taxes, to entice them to locate their businesses here, Property taxes have been the predominant source of Wisconsin's General Revenue.  For State and local Government revenues in Wisconsin, $42.3 per $1,000 personal property value is collected, while corporations pay only $4.6 per $1,000 income.

      In other words, individuals pay 9.2 TIMES in personal property tax rates what corporations pay for their income tax rate.  Low tax rates for corporations (which is something that Republicans have always supported), result in HIGHER TAXES for property owners!  Any time corporations get a tax cut, somebody else has to pick up the slack. That means YOU.

 

     By the way, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities advises that:

 

     "Contrary to what some consider common wisdom, a tax increase can be good policy during a recession. Tax increases are a better option than deep spending cuts — better both for families already suffering due to the recession and for state economies. Tax increases can be designed in such a way that they impose relatively little or no costs on the most vulnerable families; this can be done, for example, by targeting the increase on households with the highest incomes or on profitable corporations. Moreover, as the economists Joseph Stiglitz and Peter Orszag (among others) have noted, tax increases take less money out of the economy than spending cuts, for reasons described more fully below.

 

      One major factor that is reducing, though not eliminating, the need for tax increases in this recession is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Enacted in February 2009, it provides substantial money for state governments that includes roughly $140 billion to help alleviate budget shortfalls through funding for education, health care, and other government services. New York, for instance, scaled back the size of a proposed tax increase package by about $1.3 billion after the ARRA funding was announced."

 

      Also:

     "The effective income tax rate for the 400 richest families dropped in two decades, to only about 16.6% in Federal Income Taxes, even though their income INCREASED by 5 times over the same period."  Middle class Americans pay almost DOUBLE the effective tax rate of the wealthiest Americans.  (I refer to the effective tax rate, because the top tax rates for the super wealthy are almost never paid by them.  The extremely wealthy invest in non-taxable bonds and securities, so that only 20% to 60% of their REPORTED income is ever taxed.  And, unlike Americans with JOBS, who pay taxes on every penny of income, which is all tracked, recorded and reported; the extremely wealthy can bury their investments and income in layers and layers of corporate "cover" so that it is never found, and if they don't voluntarily report it, it isn't taxed!)

 

     The Bush tax cuts gave these richest families $18 Billion in tax cuts per year.  The richest 200 individuals in America got richer by a combined $640 BILLION over the course of 8 years under Bush.

    

   For more on tax policies in Wisconsin and in the U.S. click here.

 

 

      While celebrating the anniversary of our Independence from a foreign tyrant, we may want to consider what the founding fathers really intended for us, and what positions our two majority political parties are taking in support or opposition to those principles.

 

 

      The Declaration Of Independence, Read Aloud, is also available from NPR.org  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128242656&sc=emaf

          ( I’d recommend that you download the file first before attempting to play it.)

      

      This message was included:

     

      Declaration of Independence

 

      *Listen/Watch on NPR.org*

       Many stories at NPR.org have audio or visual content. When you visit the link

       above, look for a "Listen" or "Watch" button.  

      For technical support, please visit NPR's Audio/Visual Help page: http://help.npr.org/npr/consumer/kbdetail.asp?kbid=152

 

    

"   The effective income tax rate for the 400 richest families dropped in two decades, to only about 16.6% in Federal Income Taxes, even though their income INCREASED by 5 times over the same period."  The Bush tax cuts gave them $18 Billion in tax cuts per year.

    

    For more on tax policies in Wisconsin and in the U.S. click here.

 

           

     Want to make sure that Corporations DON'T have the unlimited funding to support Right Wing Republican Extremists?  DON'T DO BUSINESS WITH THEM - EVER!

 

     If YOU don't give the money to them in the first place, by doing business with them, THEY won't have the money to give to THEIR candidates!  Stop doing business with the big banks and insurance companies who don't live up to their agreements with their customers.  Stop doing business with the international conglomerates who funnel money to them.  Stop doing business with international banks who won't give local businesses and individuals loans, and instead do business with local credit unions.  Stop doing business with the big box stores like Walmart, Target, Home Depot, Georgia Pacific, Koch Industries, and other businesses like Pennzoil, Amazon, Land's End (A Madison based company which had a progressive founder, but who sold out to Republicans who brought in Rudy Giuliani to speak to the company employees - the former owner took out a full page ad to protest against the current owners AND the Bush Administration), General Mills, Exxon, AT&T and Verizon who donate heavily to Republicans.  Go to BuyBlue.org to find businesses who support Progressives, and OpenSecrets.org to find out which companies give to which candidates and why!

 

 

     For that matter, stop doing business with local businesses who support Republicans locally.

   

     Don't think boycotts have an impact?  When local Channels 18 and 24, owned by the Sinclair Broadcast Group, was airing the sleazy anti-Kerry swiftboat ads, in 2004, customers boycotting companies who advertised on their stations cost Sinclair Broadcast Group, over a period of a few months, $100 MILLION in advertising revenues from businesses who pulled their advertising from those stations.  Sinclair Broadcast Group controls 22% of the broadcast market in the United States.

 

     Current Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen ( R ) has refused to get involved in consumer protection issues contrary to the efforts of his predecessor, Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager (D), who made it her policy to go after "Payday Loan" and furniture rental companies who charged exorbitant fees for their services, (which, prior to Republican control, had been considered USURY, but after Republicans got in power, excessive fees and rates became standard).

 

     Democratic Challenger Scott Hassett for the office of Attorney General, successfully prosecuted MENARDS for the largest pollution case in Wisconsin State History.  I guess that is why MENARDS is backing J.B. Van Hollen.

 

     Companies like GM who went bankrupt because of the economy, and incompetence on the part of their executives, are now 60% owned by the U.S. Taxpayers, and 10% owned by Canadian Taxpayers.

 

     Even the largest companies are at risk in this economy.  And even the smallest losses of revenues can put them out of business, because of their huge overheads.

 

     If you want to insure that they won't have unlimited funds available to donate to Republican - Don't do business with them in the first place.  Do business with companies which have the same values as you do. 

 

 

    Congressman F. James Sensenbrenner has his Town Hall meetings posted on his website.  Click HERE to get Town Hall Meeting information.  Show Up.  Audio and Video Tape the events.  Send us copies.  (email the digital files to chair5thcddpw@gmail.com )

 

  

 

 

     Let's Set The Record Straight on Healthcare Reform!
Click
here for the facts:

 

    http://wisc5thcddems.com/WebSitePageEditor/default.aspx?fileUrl=Issues.aspx&tabName=edit

 

       

      

      

 

     Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner hosts town hall meetings throughout the 5th CD. This is a big opportunity for Democrats to get answers that Sensenbrenner's constituents deserve to hear.  So, when they are announced, you may want to attend and be prepared to ask questions.  It helps if you have some background on issues so that you can debate him when he throws his propaganda at you to cloud the issues, and use it as an opportunity to get on his soapbox to shove his opinions down your throat, rather than listening to his constituents.

 

     You might want to ask him these questions:

   

     How do you expect tax credits to fix the skyrocketing costs of healthcare?

   

     Tax credits only give you an offset for a portion of the expenses that you have.  It doesn't pay for all of the healthcare, or even a major portion of it.  And it doesn't have any affect on Doctors or Hospitals raising the costs of healthcare to their clients, or healthcare insurance premiums skyrocketing faster than wages, and insurance policies forcing policy holders to pay higher and higher co-payments and out-of-pocket costs before health insurance even kicks in.

 

     Nationwide, the average health care costs for every man, woman and child run about $9,000.  In Wisconsin, that number is closer to $10,800.  The latest Wisconsin Health Insurance Cost Ranking report for 2010 was released on

     December 22, 2009, and is available on www.citizenactionwi.org

 

     The report shows that there is a 19% variation between the highest cost major metro area and the lowest cost metro area, which amounts to a $1,608 difference for a single policy each year.

 

     Wisconsin health insurance costs continued their rapid rise in 2009, rising 9% overall dispite a very slow rate of general inflation for other consumer products.  There is also a large gap in the rate of healthcare inflation in different areas of the state, with some rising by 11% and others rising by 3%.

           

     All Wisconsin regions and metro areas have suffered healthcare insurance inflation above the national average.

       

     While national employer-based single health insurance premiums have increased 120% this decade, they have increased 179% in Wisconsin.

   

     The report also finds that the national for-profit insurance companies offer the lowest quality health plans, as measured by performance measures and consumer satisfaction.  SE Wisconsin has among the highest health insurance costs, but the lowest quality health plans, because of the predominance of the national for-profit companies in the region.

 

     National for-profit health care plans can have 40% or 50% of their total income going toward actual healthcare, with 30% or 40% going towards overhead, and the remainder paying off shareholders.  The top six insurance companies had profit increases of 480% in the last few years.  American Chronicle reported on July 19, 2009 that the CEO of United Healthcare received $1.7 BILLION in executive pay TWO YEARS AGO.

 

     Medicare, which is a GOVERNMENT RUN PROGRAM, only has about 2% to 3% of the total expenses going towards overhead, while 97% to 98% goes towards actual patient healthcare.

 

     The proposed healthcare reform bills in Congress require that private insurance companies put 80% of their total revenues actually going towards patient healthcare.  That gives more healthcare to more people, while still allowing private companies money to pay for their overhead costs.  The difference is that private insurance companies are currently spending more money to pay people in their companies to DENY benefits to their policy holders, EVEN WHEN THOSE BENEFITS ARE COVERED.  You are paying for their salaries, when you send them a premium check.  And if you don't believe it, try getting your medical bills paid for by your insurance company, when you have a life-threatening, or chronic, expensive illness or disability that they would have to pay for, long-term.  You will run into delays of payments, denials of coverage, and countless excuses of why they shouldn't have to pay for it because of technicalities, which were INTENTIONALLY not detailed in your insurance policy.

 

     Insurance policies are written in legalese and double-talk, with vague explanations of what they cover and don't cover, and areas in one part of the policy that are completely refuted in other areas of the policy, if you read them carefully.  It is typical of legal documents that are written to allow them "weasel room" to wiggle out of a commitment, if they can make a case that they aren't responsible for paying the costs, or simply are able to delay payments until the policy holder simply gives up and refuses to fight them.

      

     $635 million has been spent by lobbyists on the healthcare issue, lobbying Congress over the last two years. 

 

    Is there no wonder why people are supporting and enrolling in Wisconsin's Badger Care Plus?  (A Medicaid program for the poor, which had to suspend enrollments because of the surge of people trying to get coverage under the program.) 

    

    Why is it that you have no problem in accepting a healthcare plan for yourself, provided to Federal employees, that give you 100% coverage of benefits, when you refuse to allow that same policy extended to the general public?

   

    When constituents ask you why you defend yourself in taking the benefits of this "socialist healthcare" for yourself, when you have healthcare coverage paid for by the U.S. Taxpayer, yet refuse to support healthcare reform that would provide the same quality healthcare to your constituents - you have argued that your healthcare coverage isn't as good as what teachers get.

   

    I suppose that means that the teachers' LABOR UNION does a BETTER JOB at providing healthcare benefits to their members, than the U.S. Congress has done to provide healthcare benefits to citizens of the United States, or even to members of Congress themselves?

 

    Congressman Sensenbrenner, you have proposed as the Republican alternatives to the Democrats healthcare reform plan: HSAs (Healthcare Savings Accounts), which the individual funds by themselves and are nothing more than savings accounts.  You also support Paul Ryan and Jim DeMint's Health Plan Proposals which were written by the Lewin Group, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Healthcare, the same insurance company which denied coverage to a healthy baby boy, because they claimed he was overweight.

 

    The Lewin Group is part of Ingenix, a UnitedHealth subsidiary that was accused by the New York attorney general and the American Medical Association, a physician's group, of helping insurers shift medical expenses to consumers by distributing skewed data…In January, UnitedHealth agreed to a $50 million settlement with the New York attorney general and a $350 million settlement with the AMA, covering conduct going back as far as 1994.” [Washington Post, 7/22/09]

 

    Congressman Sensenbrenner, how much do you receive in donations from insurance industry, pharmaceutical industry and lobbyists from the healthcare industry to vote against the interests of your constituents, and do nothing to control the out of control costs of healthcare?

 

    After witnessing corporations deliberately wasting funds on unnecessary bonuses and travel luxuries, do you continue to support restricting bank regulations?

 

    On more than one occasion, you have voted against bills that would protect members of the LGBT community from discriminatory, or even VIOLENT acts.  Could you explain your reasoning for this?

 

    Over five years ago, when you were the House Judiciary Chair, and the Republican Party was in control of Congress, a whistle-blower reported secret bank accounts held in The (Royal) LGT Bank of Liechtenstein, (a favorite vacation spot of yours), to hide money for millionaire/billionaire tax evaders, yet you and the Republican Congress never took any legal action, or even investigated the evidence, or took action to make these tax evaders pay their fair share of taxes.  The LGT Bank reportedly held an estimated $1.2 TRILLION in assets being hidden by tax evaders.  Yes, that is not a typo.  That's TRILLION.  (Remember when we were told by Republican politicians that when the billionaires were given huge tax cuts that they would invest it in businesses and create jobs so the money would "trickle-down"?  Now you know where it all "trickle-went!") 

 

     Only now, with a Democratic Congress, is it being investigated and publicly reported that over 70 countries (in every continent except Antarctica), have been involved in hiding money for tax evaders.  A Republican Congressman who opposed the bank and auto industry bailouts, suggested on the floor of Congress, that as much as $20 TRILLION in hidden funds would be "repatriated" into the U.S. economy, if Congress would waive the criminal penalties and fines! (Keep in mind, that not only did this Republican Congressman know that $20 Trillion was being kept in illegal bank accounts to evade taxes, but he knew this in spite of the fact that the major media has never reported it!  So Republicans knew about this when Bush was still in office, yet they never did anything to recover the funds to keep the U.S. Government from going bankrupt, or to keep the U.S. and global economy from collapsing! )

 

     Congress recently offered the tax scofflaws an opportunity to turn themselves in for leniency.  October 15, 5:00 p.m. was the deadline and only 7,500 people turned themselves in, even though there were over 57,000 tax evaders reported from ONE BANK ALONE.   NPR reported that most of these tax scofflaws aren't willing to turn themselves in because they figure that the U.S. Government won't take the time, or commit the resources to investigate and go after them, assuming that they won't be able to find them, or uncover all of their hidden funds and their sources. 

 

     Senator John McCain's Senior Presidential Campaign Advisor, Senator Phil Gramm, is Vice Chairman for UBS in America, which has been shown to have actively pursued and advised thousands of clients to create secret offshore bank accounts to evade U.S. taxes, contrary to U.S. law.  In February, UBS agreed to a $780 million settlement of criminal charges that it had sent bankers posing as tourists into the USA to help clients evade taxes.  In August, UBS agreed to settle an IRS civil lawsuit by providing data for nearly 4,500 U.S. clients whose accounts once held an estimated $18 BILLION.  12 Key Figures Prosecuted in UBS Tax Evasion Case. 

 

     According to the IRS, two-thirds of all corporations operating in the United States (U.S. and Foreign), don't pay anything in income taxes.  Yup, that's right - zip, zero, zilch.  According to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, two-thirds of all corporations operating in the State of Wisconsin don't pay anything in income taxes either.  And that is in spite of the fact that corporate taxes were at their lowest under Republican Governors, and have increased somewhat under Governor Doyle, to take some of the pressure off of individual property owners.  The Institute for Wisconsin's Future reported that the Corporate sector underpaid state and local taxes by $1 Billion in 2007 alone.  For more information on tax policy and actual documentation that disproves the Republican rants about "the need for tax cuts for the wealthy" click HERE.

   

     Representative Sensenbrenner: When are you going to go after the wealthy tax evaders and collect the taxes they legally owe so that your middle-class and small business owner constituents don't have to continue to pay more than their fair share of taxes, in order to pay the taxes that your wealthy buddies HAVEN'T BEEN PAYING? 

 

    

 

     If you like what you see, join us!

    

      Become a member!     

      Contribute: http://www.wisdems.org/contribute.asp

      

     Or if you prefer to donate directly to the Fifth Congressional District Democratic Party click HERE.

 

     Volunteer: http://www.democrats.org/modules/votercontact/login_signup.php

 

     Get eMail Updates!

 

 

     State Party News: http://www.wisdems.org/release.asp?id=0


Become a stakeholder in taking back America!

   

        Get Your Democracy Bonds Today!

     Check out our Newsletter for the latest information on what is going on in the 5th CD. 

 

 

     If you'd like to blog with other Democrats around the State, click here. (Links to the Wisconsin State WisDems.org blogsite.) 

 

 

    There have been a number of inquiries regarding Homeowner or Condominium Owner Associations prohibiting Resident Owners from displaying political signs during campaign season.  It is ILLEGAL for them to prohibit the display of campaign signs.  They may, however, determine the size and placement (within reason), of the signage.  I've provided the Wisconsin State Statutes which cover this issue below:

 

      Wisconsin State Statute prohibiting Homeowner or Condo Associations from prohibiting their owners from posting political signs.

 

 

    http://nxt.legis.state.wi.us/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=default.htm&d=stats&jd=ch.%20703

 

     

      703.105(1m)      
(1m) No bylaw or rule may be adopted or provision included in a declaration or deed that prohibits a unit owner from displaying in his or her condominium a sign that supports or opposes a candidate for public office or a referendum question.

      703.105(2)      
(2) Notwithstanding subs. (1) and (1m), bylaws or rules may be adopted that regulate the size and location of signs, flags and flagpoles.

 

 

 

     A man walks up to the White House gate and says he is there to see George Bush. The Marine guarding the gate informs the man "George Bush doesn't live here anymore".

 

     The man says "Thank you" and walks away.


 

     The next day the same man walks up to the same gate and says to the same Marine "I am here to see George Bush".

 

     The Marine says, I am sorry sir, but George Bush does not live here anymore."

 

     The man says "Thank you" and walks away.


 

     The next day the same man walks up to the same White House gate and says "I am here to see George Bush".

 

    The marine at the gate says to the man, "Sir, for three days now you have come to this gate asking to see George Bush and for three days I have told you that he does not live here anymore. Why do you keep coming back?"

 

    The man says, "I just like hearing you say it, that's all"

 

    The Marine then smiled, saluted and said " I'll see you tomorrow sir."

 

 

     For online access to information regarding where the money from The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is going, go to:  Recovery.gov

 

    Read the full bill, or download the PDF documents go here:   

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

     For information on the Repower America plan, to convert America to 100% clean electric power within ten years, by replacing coal and foreign oil while creating cheaper energy and more jobs, go to: RepowerAmerica.org

    

      American Workers Fare Better Under Democratic Presidents - Here's the Proof
    

      In viewing Appendix Table 2:

   

     7 out of 10 of the last recessions on record occurred under Republican Administrations, (8 of 11 if you count the one we are currently in.)

       

     

 
 

      1954 and 1958 under President Eisenhower (The 1961 Recession began shortly after Eisenhower left office);      

      1970 under President Nixon;

      1975 under President Ford (who took office after Nixon resigned);

      1982 under President Reagan;

      1991 under President George H.W. Bush;

       and 2001 under President George W. Bush.   Republicans controlled both Houses of Congress for six years prior to the 2001 recession.   (2008 - We are currently in another recession under Dubya, but we won’t know what the results will be until five years from now, so that obviously has been left off of the chart.  Republicans controlled both Houses of Congress for 12 of the previous 14 years prior to this last recession.  And while Democrats have a slight majority in both Houses of Congress now, they haven’t been able to pass any laws rescinding Bush’s and Republican policies because they don’t have enough votes – they need Republican votes in order for the bills to pass, and for Bush to sign them – not to mention the 2/3rds majority they need to override Bush’s vetoes.) 

 

      Going back further to the Great Depression, Calvin Coolidge (Republican) was President 1923-1929, prior to and during the Great Depression, with Herbert Hoover (Republican) 1929-1933 following him.  He didn't do a very good job at getting us out of the Depression, so he only served one term.   It should also be noted that Republicans controlled both houses of Congress for the eight years prior to and during the Great Depression, and for three years after the Depression hit, with heavy majorities.

 

      Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Democrat) 1933-1945, did such a good job cleaning up their mess, that he was elected to four terms in office.  Democrats in Congress also had much to do with the changes in policy that Roosevelt was able to get passed because they had been elected to replace the Republicans who had gotten them into the Depression in the first place.  They enjoyed dominance in both houses for the twelve years during Roosevelt’s presidency and the two years after.

   

      Note also the highest wage and salary average percentage shares / (recovery) (percentage of the total national income growth) for the five years after the recessions, occurred under Democrats Harry S. Truman  59.9% (1945-1953), John F. Kennedy (1961-1963) and LBJ (1963-1969) 49.8% and President Jimmy Carter 50.6% (1977-1981); the lowest wage and salary percentage shares coming from Republican Administrations – Nixon (1969-1974) 35.3%, Reagan (1981-1989) 37.0%, and Bush (2001-2009) 34%;

 

      while corporate profits increased the most under Republican President George W. Bush, a whopping 45.9% (2001-2009) followed by Bill Clinton 29.5% (1993-2001), John F. Kennedy (1961-1963) 22.9% and Lyndon Baines Johnson 22.9% (1963-1969), all Democrats.

 

      Bill Clinton’s recovery after George H.W. Bush’s recession, was only a little under average for wage and salary percentage shares 45.9% (Eisenhower and Reagan did a little better at 48.9%, 49.6% and 49.2% respectively), and second only to George W. Bush’s for corporations at 29.5%.

 

      Wages and Salaries recovery fared the worst under George W. Bush 34% - even worse than under Nixon 35.3% and Reagan 37% and 49.2%.  (Do you see a trend here?)

 

      McCain wants not only to continue Bush’s policies, but to reduce corporate taxes, while increasing taxes on the poor and middle income individuals as well as taxing Social Security and health benefits.

       

      It is clear that both wage and salary earners, and corporations do well under Democratic Presidents; but even taking into consideration that the latest numbers reflect excessive profit taking by the big Oil Companies, it is obvious that while wage earners don't do well, corporations are heavily favored under Republican Presidents. 

 

      When it comes to the economy, if you are looking for a recovery, which political party is in the White House matters.  And it matters a great deal.

  
     For more on taxes go here: http://wisc5thcddems.com/Taxes.aspx
 

 

 

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/12/representation-without-ta_n_118455.html

   Representation Without Taxation: Study Says Most Corporations Avoid US Income Tax

 

    JENNIFER C. KERR | August 12, 2008 06:31 AM EST |

 

    WASHINGTONTwo-thirds of U.S. corporations paid no federal income taxes between 1998 and 2005, according to a new report from Congress.

 

    The study by the Government Accountability Office, expected to be released Tuesday, said about 68 percent of foreign companies doing business in the U.S. avoided corporate taxes over the same period.

 

   

      For more on taxes go here: http://wisc5thcddems.com/Taxes.aspx

 
 

 

 

    Fair Use Notice:

     This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes

 
Welcome!

Welcome to all people of like persuasion, and for those who are interested in a different perspective than what you are likely to hear from the media talking heads.
 
This website is here to provide you with links to resources, blogs and other websites that can offer you in depth information about issues that concern you, but aren't being covered by most of mainstream media.
 
We are also here to provide you with contact information on who or where to go to with questions or concerns about issues that matter to you and which you would like to see action taken on.  
 
 
The Democratic Party is YOUR Party


This is YOUR Democratic Party.
 
What happens here is a result of actions taken by individuals who care enough to get involved.  We are not paid for our work.  We are all volunteers.  The only paid individuals in the DPW are the staff at our headquarters, and the Chair of the Democratic Party.  If you aren't involved, and wonder why there isn't more being done by the Democratic Party in YOUR area, look in the mirror and ask yourself that same question.
 
If you are interested in having a voice in what happens in politics and how it affects you, your health, your lifestyle and your freedoms, we welcome your involvement.
 
There are many volunteer opportunities for local, state and national projects which are currently being linked to this website.  The effectiveness of the Democratic Party is based on how involved the people are.  Don't expect a handful of individuals to do the work all by themselves.  We need YOUR help to make this work.
 
(Republicans need volunteers to do their work as well.  The thing is, that they have deep pockets and can pay a lot for the "work" that they do.  Back in 2004, local Republican "volunteers" were being paid $100 each, to attend and disrupt Democratic activities, for each event they disrupted.  They are heavily funded by special interests to keep their gravy train rolling.)
 
Imagine what could be accomplished if people of both parties would actually be interested in working together to solve problems, instead of working to create new ones. 
 
If you want to get involved, but just don't know for what or how to go about it, consider browsing through the different pages and links on this site, go to the blogs to see what people are talking about and weigh in on some of the issues yourself to get some ideas.
 
If you need to contact someone, send me an email
 
Educational links on issues of importance are in the process of being added so that you have resources at your fingertips.  Click on the "Educational Resource LInks" and "Issues" link at the bottom left.
 
This is your opportunity to offer your input on a local level, to have some impact on state and national politics.

Democratic Values

 

Democrats are the party of opportunity, dedicated to helping every American achieve the promise of freedom, success and financial security.

 

Throughout our history, Democrats have fought against the special interests and for the needs of America's working families

 

To help Americans work and retire in dignity, Democrats passed legislation creating Social Security and Medicare, affordable college loans, the G.I. Bill, the 40-hour work week, and family and medical leave.

 

Today, we are still fighting for those who are working and those who are looking for work, for parents, for the disabled, for senior citizens, and for our children.

 

We believe diversity is our country's greatest strength, and that we can work together to build a stronger, brighter future.

 

Our agenda is your agenda: national security, economic security, education, affordable healthcare, secure pensions and 401 (k) benefits, and a clean environment.

DPW - 5th Congressional District Officers